Atormac
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 2704  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  » Next article
  » Previous article 
  » Table of Contents
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (95 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Introduction
 »  Technique
 »  Precautions
 »  Discussion
 »  Conclusion
 »  Acknowledgements
 »  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7752    
    Printed209    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded290    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal

   
TECHNICAL ARTICLE
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 333-335

Intracranial pressure monitoring in a resource-constrained environment: A technical note


Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632004

Correspondence Address:
Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632 004
mjoseph@cmcvellore.ac.in

  »  Abstract

Most published literature supports the use of ICP monitoring as a standard of care, though the benefit has never been conclusively proved by a prospective, randomized trial. Unfortunately, ICP monitoring is routinely performed in very few centers in India on a systematic basis. This is probably due to the common perception that it requires very sophisticated facilities and is prohibitively expensive for most patients. The author’s institution was also faced with a comparable situation, and we have therefore developed a simple and economical system that is presented in practical detail. No custom-made equipment is necessary, and all disposables should be available in any hospital pharmacy. It is our hope that this will enable any center with an ICU for the management of neurosurgical patients to begin monitoring ICP. The system has been in consistent use for 3 years in our institution, and over 100 patients have been monitored successfully.

How to cite this article:
Joseph M. Intracranial pressure monitoring in a resource-constrained environment: A technical note. Neurol India 2003;51:333-5


How to cite this URL:
Joseph M. Intracranial pressure monitoring in a resource-constrained environment: A technical note. Neurol India [serial online] 2003 [cited 2019 Oct 15];51:333-5. Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2003/51/3/333/1162


   »   Introduction  Top


Though there is no Class I evidence that intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring improves outcome in head injury, the bulk of published data supports this view.[1],[2],[3],[4] Therefore ICP monitoring should form an integral part of the management of severe head injuries, as well as of other neurosurgical and neurological conditions where indicated. Unfortunately, although there are centers in India that monitor ICP, the practice is routinely performed in very few institutions. This is probably due to the assumption that ICP monitoring is technologically very demanding, and also because commercially available systems are extremely expensive in the Indian setting.
The ideal ICP monitoring device should be accurate, reliable, cost-effective and should cause minimal morbidity. There are several techniques available for monitoring ICP, with differing accuracy and reliability, and with substantial differences in costs. An economical, accurate and safe system that also offers the advantage of therapeutic CSF drainage is described for use in the Indian context, with the total cost of disposables being less than Rs 500.


Material required
All the equipment necessary for ICP monitoring by this technique should be readily available in any hospital with an ICU and monitors for the care of head injury patients. These include (a) a monitor capable of invasive pressure recording (such as arterial pressure) with ordinary transducer; (b) size 8 Fr infant feeding tube (preferably gas sterilized again for absolute sterility); (c) disposable plastic items (a pressure line extension, 3 three-way stopcocks, two IV sets, one glass bottle of 100 ml saline, arterial pressure dome and a sterile CSF collection bag or bottle; (d) a drill capable of making a 3mm craniostomy (we use a manual twist drill).

   »   Technique Top


Placement of ventricular catheter
With a slight modification of the conventional methods used for ventricular drainage, even the small ventricles of a trauma patient can be cannulated in over 90% of cases. The site of the craniostomy is on the medial canthal parasagittal line (usually on the right) immediately in front of the coronal suture. The ventricular cannula is angled perpendicularly on the sagittal plane and minimally medially in the coronal plane. This trajectory causes the catheter to follow the obliquity of the frontal horn and helps in ensuring that the hole-bearing segment is within the ventricle.[5] Changes may have to be made in case of midline shift - however, our experience has been that an attempt on the side to which the shift has taken place is invariably successful. Care must be taken to ensure that more than 7 cm of the catheter is not introduced into the skull. The catheter may be tunneled before entering the skull, and the entire site dressed appropriately.
The connections of the system are as shown in the schematic diagram [Figure - 1]. However, the sequence of connections is important in ensuring that accurate readings are obtained.
The ventricle is cannulated and the feeding tube stoppered. This may also be done after all the following connections are made. The pressure monitoring line, the three-ways stopcocks and the pressure dome are connected as in the figure. After thorough cleaning of the top of the saline bottle, IV set 1 is connected to the saline and three-way 1 and the entire system is filled with saline without bubbles. The bottle is drained, without the IV set being touched at any time by anyone except the operator. Care must be taken to ensure that the third stem of three-way 2 has no fluid in it. The saline bottle is then removed (keeping the top sterile) and the CSF collection device is connected to IV set 1. IV set 2 is connected to the third stem of three-way 2 and the other end to the empty bottle, making sure that the residual saline does not enter the IV set. The airway of the IV set is now opened and closed once to equate the pressure of the air in the bottle with the atmosphere. The end of the pressure line extension is now firmly connected to the ventricular catheter; this junction is dressed with antiseptic-soaked sterile gauze and reinforced with adhesive. The pressure dome is appropriately mounted on the transducer.

Measurement of ICP and CSF drainage
Once the system is set up it is utilized as follows:
Zeroing of the transducer is carried out by opening it to the air in the bottle, which is henceforth assumed to be equal to atmospheric pressure. This is done by turning three-way 2 to cut off the patient side of the circuit. It has been calculated that the pressure in the bottle varies by less than 1 mm Hg for every 10[0]C change in temperature. This closed system of zeroing is recommended as it prevents the system being periodically exposed to the exterior with the attendant risk of infection.
The waveform on the monitor must be pulsatile or it is not reliable. The response to raised ICP in the author's ICU is to check for technical error, zero the transducer, look for non-neurosurgical causes like restlessness, fighting ventilator, non-ideal head or neck position, etc., check adequacy of ventilation and only then assume that the cause is intracranial - in over 90% of raised ICP alarms the cause is systemic.
Once the systemic causes are ruled out CSF is drained under direct vision. This cannot be overemphasized because if the ventricle is allowed to collapse onto the catheter it will get blocked - the commonest reason for failure of the system. Drainage is carried out by turning three-way 1 to divert CSF into the collection device. The IV set should be held in one's hand to ensure continuous flow, and the three-way should be turned off the moment the flow stops. It is recommended that the drainage be carried out in aliquots of 1-2 ml.
If ICP is not controlled with drainage, other measures including mannitol, hyperventilation and repeat CT scan may be taken as preferred.


   »   Precautions Top


The site of craniostomy is much closer to the midline than usual - care must be taken to ensure that it does not slip onto the midline. When there is marked midline shift, care must be taken to ensure that the angle of the cannula does not lead to breach of the pia-arachnoid on the medial surface of the hemisphere. Any accidental breach of the system after set-up is an indication for the immediate removal of the entire system to avoid the risk of ventriculitis. If collection of CSF is essential, the procedure should be performed with at least glove and mask precautions.

   »   Discussion Top


There are several techniques available for monitoring, which have been ranked by the Brain Trauma Foundation based on their accuracy, stability and ability to drain CSF as follows:[6]
· Intraventricular devices - fluid-coupled catheter with an external strain gauge or catheter tip pressure transducer
· Parenchymal catheter tip pressure transducer devices
· Subdural devices - catheter tip pressure transducer or fluid-coupled catheter with an external strain gauge
· Subarachnoid fluid-coupled device with an external strain gauge
· Epidural devices
The reference standard for ICP monitoring is still the intraventricular device,[6] and it is necessary for all the other systems to be compared against it for accuracy. Of the few centers in India which routinely monitor ICP, the majority use subarachnoid bolts that are comparatively less accurate and do not offer the therapeutic option of CSF drainage. The ability to drain CSF is an important additional treatment alternative in the control of raised ICP that is available only with ventricular catheters. It permits direct lowering of ICP without the systemic effects of all the other measures such as sedation, osmotic agents, hyperventilation and chemical paralysis.

Selection of patients
Though there is a broad consensus on the indications for monitoring in head injury,[7],[8] there are no guidelines for ICP monitoring in non-trauma patients. The decision regarding these patients will depend on the experience of the institution and the estimation of risk versus benefit for a particular patient.

Costs
The Brain Trauma Foundation analysis of the costs of various systems of ICP monitoring makes the statement that “generally, fluid-coupled ICP systems were less than half the cost of other systems”.[6] The cost of all the disposables is less than Rs.400, and even after allowing Rs 100 for the cost of the pressure dome (reused an average of 4 times with ethylene oxide sterilization), the total expense to the patient is less than Rs 500. The only other device with comparable accuracy is the parenchymal catheter tip transducer. This requires the purchase of a dedicated monitor, and the disposables (not by any means universally available) cost more than Rs 4,000. In addition, if used as a parenchymal monitor CSF drainage is not possible. Other devices available are not as accurate as these two alternatives.

Complications
The reported complication rate for ventricular catheters varies widely. Infection rates range from 0% to 10.3%.[9],[10] The incidence of infection increases with the duration of the monitoring, and also with breach of the closed system.[11] It is for this reason that the closed system of zeroing was developed, and monitoring is discontinued if there is any breach in the system. Published reports of hemorrhage rates also vary, with an average incidence of 1.1%.[6],[8],[10]
The infection rate with the system described here was 2% in our series. Though routine scans are not carried out in our institution, a strict protocol ensures that patients with ICP requiring paralysis or those who deteriorate clinically have repeat CT scans. The incidence of hemorrhage detected with this protocol is 2%. One of these was an extradural hematoma caused by operator inexperience (attempting to penetrate the dura with a blunt cannula) and the other a parenchymal hematoma.

   »   Conclusion Top


This is a simple, economical and accurate system that can be used in any ICU managing neurosurgical patients. The only limitations of the system are the number of connections and the absolute dependence on a patent fluid column - once the catheter gets blocked the system is useless. There is a learning curve for both doctors (cannulation of small ventricles) and all ICU staff (preventing catheter block and appropriate response to raised ICP), but once this period is passed monitoring becomes a matter of routine. It is hoped that this system will come into general use in centers where ICP monitoring has so far not been carried out due to economic reasons.

   »   Acknowledgements Top


This technique of ICP monitoring was presented by the author at the National Neurotrauma Conference 2002, Agra.
 

  »   References Top

1.BeckerDP, Miller JD, Ward JD, Greenberg RP, Young HF, Sakalas R. The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 1977;47:491-502.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.SaulTG, Ducker TB. Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1982;56:498-503.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Colohan AR, Alves Wm, Gross CR, Torner JC, Mehta VS, Tandon PN, et al. Head injury mortality in two centers with different emergency medical services and intensive care. J Neurosurg 1989;71:202-7.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Bulger EM, Nathens AB, Rivara FP, Moore M, MacKenzie EJ, Jurkovich GJ. Brain Trauma Foundation. Management of severe head injury: institutional variations in care and effect on outcome. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1870-6.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Pang D, Grabb PA. Accurate placement of coronal ventricular catheter using stereotactic coordinate-guided free-hand passage. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1994;80:750-5.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Recommendations for intracranial pressure monitoring technology. J Neurotrauma 2000;17:497-506.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 2000;17:479-91.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Narayan RK, Kishore PR, Becker DP, Ward JD, Enas GG, Greenberg RP, et al. Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1982;56:650-9.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Clark WC, Muhlbauer MS, Lowrey R, Hartman M, Ray MW, Watridge CB. Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in trauma patients. Neurosurgery 1989;25:20-4.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  
10.Friedman WA, Vries JK. Percutaneous tunnel ventriculostomy. Summary of 100 procedures. J Neurosurg 1980;53:662-5.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  
11.Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, Spadora AC, Baggett JW, Ward JD, et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984;310:553-9.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  

 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow