Atormac
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 1159  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (258 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1088    
    Printed27    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded29    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 702

Comment on "Susceptibility-weighted imaging: The value in cerebral astrocytomas"


1 Primary Care Unit, KMT Center, Bangkok, Thailand
2 Visiting Professor, Hainan Medical University, China

Date of Submission20-Sep-2013
Date of Decision08-Oct-2013
Date of Acceptance29-Dec-2013
Date of Web Publication20-Jan-2014

Correspondence Address:
Sora Yasri
Primary Care Unit, KMT Center, Bangkok
Thailand
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.125411

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Yasri S, Wiwanitkit V. Comment on "Susceptibility-weighted imaging: The value in cerebral astrocytomas". Neurol India 2013;61:702

How to cite this URL:
Yasri S, Wiwanitkit V. Comment on "Susceptibility-weighted imaging: The value in cerebral astrocytomas". Neurol India [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Sep 24];61:702. Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2013/61/6/702/125411


Sir,

We read with interest the paper on "susceptibility-weighted imaging: The value in cerebral astrocytomas grading" by Zhang and colleagues. [1] The authors have concluded that "CE-SWI was better than CE-T1WI in visualizing tumor architecture. There are some concerns on this study; the study sample is small and there was no assessment of the effect of image interpreter' experience. In fact, it is necessary to differentiate the astrocytoma from other highly similar lesions in CE-SWI such as lymphoma, [2] brain abscess [3] and others. In other similar study, it has been observed that the diagnostic accuracy of CE-SWI was not good and the sensitivity and specificity were 81.8% and 80.0%, respectively. [4]

 
  References Top

1.Zhang H, Tan Y, Wang XC, Qing JB, Wang L, Wu XF, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: The value in cerebral astrocytomas grading. Neurol India 2013;61:389-95.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Peters S, Knoß N, Wodarg F, Cnyrim C, Jansen O. Glioblastomas vs. lymphomas: More diagnostic certainty by using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Rofo 2012;184:713-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Toh CH, Wei KC, Chang CN, Hsu PW, Wong HF, Ng SH, et al. Differentiation of pyogenic brain abscesses from necrotic glioblastomas with use of susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1534-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Zhang W, Zhao J, Guo D, Zhong W, Shu J, Luo Y. Application of susceptibility weighted imaging in revealing intratumoral blood products and grading gliomas. J Radiol 2010;91:485-90.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow