Atormac
Neurology India
Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 1260  
 Home | Login 
  About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact  
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (822 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusion
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2430    
    Printed134    
    Emailed9    
    PDF Downloaded116    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 62  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 169-174

A prospective randomized study of use of drain versus no drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma


1 Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Radiodiagnosis, PGIMER and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission08-Dec-2013
Date of Decision15-Jan-2014
Date of Acceptance06-Apr-2014
Date of Web Publication14-May-2014

Correspondence Address:
Bhaskar Suryanarayanan
Department of Neurosurgery, Room No. 202, Academic Block, PGIMER and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi - 110 001
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.132364

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Objective: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) recurs after surgical evacuation in 5-30% of patients. Inserting subdural drain might reduce the recurrence rate, but is not commonly practiced. There are few prospective studies to evaluate the effect of subdural drains. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study to investigate the effect of subdural drains in the on recurrence rates and clinical outcome following burr-hole drainage (BHD) of CSDH was undertaken. During the study period, 246 patients with CSDH were assessed for eligibility. Among 200 patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria, 100 each were assigned to "drain group" (drain inserted into the subdural space following BHD) and "without drain group" (subdural drain was not inserted following BHD) using random allocation software. The primary end point was recurrence needing re-drainage up to a period of 6 months from surgery. Results: Recurrence occurred in 9 of 100 patients with a drain, and 26 of 100 patients in without drain group (P = 0.002). The mortality was 5% in patients with drain and 4% in patients without drain group (P = 0.744). The medical and surgical complications were comparable between the two study groups. Conclusion: Use of a subdural drain after burr-hole evacuation of a CSDH reduces the recurrence rate and is not associated with increased complications.


Keywords: Chronic subdural hematoma, recurrence, subdural drain


How to cite this article:
Singh AK, Suryanarayanan B, Choudhary A, Prasad A, Singh S, Gupta LN. A prospective randomized study of use of drain versus no drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurol India 2014;62:169-74

How to cite this URL:
Singh AK, Suryanarayanan B, Choudhary A, Prasad A, Singh S, Gupta LN. A prospective randomized study of use of drain versus no drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurol India [serial online] 2014 [cited 2017 Nov 23];62:169-74. Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2014/62/2/169/132364



 » Introduction Top


Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common types of intra-cranial hematoma, and often occurs in the elderly. Its incidence is about 5/100,000/year in the general population, but is higher for those aged 70 years and older, 58/100,000. [1] Surgical treatment has been widely accepted as the most effective way to manage CSDH. Craniotomy, burr-hole craniostomy, twist drill craniostomy and other various surgical techniques have been used for years. In a meta-analysis, Weigel et al. showed that all the three techniques have about the same mortality (2-4%). [2] Craniotomy is associated with a much higher morbidity than is craniostomy (12.3% vs. 3-4%), and recurrence with twist drill craniostomy is much higher than with burr-hole craniostomy (33% vs. 12.1%) and craniotomy (33% vs. 10.8%). Burr-hole craniostomy, an evacuation through one or two burr-holes drilled over the site of hematoma, is the most popular surgical technique worldwide. The subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) permits the neurosurgeon to drain subacute or chronic hematomas by a method which is minimally invasive, simple, and safe. [3],[4] The SEPS can be used quickly with local anesthesia only, making it ideal in elderly or sick patients who might not tolerate the physiological stress of a craniotomy under general anesthesia. [5] In mixed density collections with large proportions of acute hemorrhage and in collections with numerous intrahematomal septations, alternative surgical techniques should be considered as first-line therapies. [6]

Recurrences are a major problem and require re-rinsing of the subdural space, sometimes repeatedly. The reported recurrence rate ranges from 9.2% to 26.5% after surgical evacuation. [7] Among many measures to prevent recurrences, one is placing a subdural drain for a day or two. This has certain potential complications like risk of puncturing the cortex and causing an intra-cerebral or subdural hematoma, or causing a bacterial subdural empyema. In this study, we have compared the postoperative recurrence rates after burr-hole drainage (BHD) of CSDH with and without subdural drain. We have also compared the mortality and morbidity between two groups.


 » Materials and Methods Top


During the period of month from January 2011 to June 2012, all the patients of symptomatic CSDH) proven by computed tomography (CT) scan admitted to Department of Neurosurgery were allocated randomly in two groups using random allocation software: "With drain" included patients who were treated by burr-hole craniostomy with closed-system drainage, and "without drain" included those patients who were treated with burr-hole craniostomy without closed-system drainage. Pre- and post-operative CT scans were used for radiological evaluation. Patients were randomized into two groups once subdural hematoma was evacuated and drain placement was not contraindicated pre-operatively.

Exclusion criteria were: (1) Patients with ipsilateral hematomas who had undergone cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion within 6 months of presentation; (2) patients in whom surgery other than burr-hole evacuation was indicated; (3) patients not needing surgical treatment because of size of CSDH or clinical status of patients; and (4) patients in whom brain completely surfaced after BHD of CSDH.
"Recurrence" was defined as the occurrence of symptoms and signs attributable to an ipsilateral hematoma seen on a computed tomographic scan within 6 months of original drainage procedure. All such symptomatic recurrences were re-operated.

Surgical technique

After getting consent, the numbers of burr-holes were made as per neurosurgeon's preference and were usually made over the maximum width of hematoma. Surgeries were done under local or general anesthesia. The number of burr-holes to be made was left to the discretion of the operating surgeon because if the SDH was a localized one then placing two burr-holes as a fixed protocol would have been incorrect. The number of burr-holes made in each group is given in [Table 1]. SDH cavity was irrigated copiously with normal saline with a soft silicon catheter until clear return came out. Closed-system drain was put in the subdural space in patients of "with drain group" and was not placed in "without drain group" patients.
Table 1: Number of burr-holes made

Click here to view


The bilateral CSDHs were treated as one case, and both sides received the same treatment. The details of bilateral CSDH are given in [Table 2]. When a patient was assigned to no drain group, the subdural space was filled with normal saline and the scalp wound was closed in two layers. Those assigned to drain group, a soft silicon plain catheter was inserted into the subdural space through the burr-hole overlying the large part of the subdural cavity, and tunneled for a minimum of 5 cm away from the scalp incision. The subdural space was filled with normal saline and the scalp was closed in two layers. The drain was connected to a soft collection bag that was kept in dependent position for 48 h and then removed after doing noncontrast CT (NCCT) scan. The duration of drain placement was uniformly 48 h in all patients of drain group. The patients were followed-up with clinical symptoms or signs and if required repeat CT imaging was done.
Table 2: Details of B/L SDH cases

Click here to view


Follow-up

After discharge from hospital, patients were followed-up in the outpatient department, initially at fortnightly for 1 month, and then on a monthly basis for up to a minimum of 6 months.

Statistical methods

Student t-test was applied for comparison between two groups and Chi-square test for checking the association for the outcome variables. A P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Mean, standard deviations, and medians were reported for interval variables, and percentages were reported for categorical variables. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS statistical package (version 17.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).


 » Results Top


During the study period, 246 diagnosed patients of CSDH were assessed for the study and 200 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. Of the 46 patients excluded from the study, 5 patients had undergone CSF diversion surgery within 6 months of presentation, 3 patients required surgery other than BHD, and 21 patients were managed medically and in 17 patients brain completely surfaced after BHD of CSDH. Of the 200 patients enrolled for the study, 100 patients each were randomized to "with drain" and "without drain" group using random allocation software.

The common clinical symptoms were headache and hemiparesis [Figure 1]. Incontinence was seen in 14%, vomiting in 12% and dementia and seizures in 7% each. Patients were evaluated for other comorbid conditions. Brain atrophy, history of head trauma, and hypertension were common [Figure 2]. Most of the patients were in Glasgow Coma Scale 9-15 (79%).
Figure 1: Complaints of patients of chronic subdural hematoma at the time of admission

Click here to view
Figure 2: Co-morbidities in patients of chronic subdural hematoma

Click here to view


Of the 200 patients, 177 (88.5%) patients had unilateral CSDH and 23 (11.5%) patients have bilateral CSDH. Of the unilateral CSDH, 90 (45%) were on the right side and 87 (43.5%) were on the left side. Homogeneous collection was more common than heterogeneous one (68.5% vs. 31.5%). The most common homogeneous collection was hypodense CSDH on NCCT head. The mean midline shift on NCCT scan was 11.2 ± 4.8 mm in "with drain" group, and 10.6 ± 5.0 mm in "without drain" group (P = 0.384). The volume of CSDH was 103 ± 35.0 ml in "with drain" group, and 100.4 ± 32.7 ml in "without" drain group (P = 0.467).

Various parameters such as color of subdural fluid, subdural fluid pressure, brain expansion, volume of CSDH evacuated, and volume of saline used for irrigation were compared in the two groups [Table 3]. Comparison of these parameters was statistically not significant between two groups.
Table 3: Operative characteristics in two groups of CSDH

Click here to view


Complications of burr-hole evacuation of CSDH surgery ranged from seizures to death. In patients "With drain" group, Nine patients suffered from recurrences, and they underwent repeat surgery. Five patients expired during the postoperative period in "with drain" group. Twenty-six patients of "without drain" group suffered recurrences during follow-up. Four patients expired in "without drain group" during the postoperative period. The recurrence between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.002) [Figure 3] and the difference for mortality in the two groups was statistically not significant (P = 0.744).
Figure 3: Recurrences in two groups

Click here to view


The potential complications of subdural drain such as intra-cerebral hematoma, seizures, subdural empyema, surgical site infection, and pneumocephalus were compared in two groups and were found not to be statistically significant [Table 4]. One patient in drain group developed tension pneumocephalus (detected on repeat CT scan), in the postoperative period leading to deterioration in his sensorium. This was treated with removal of subdural drain and replacing pneumocephalus with saline through burr-hole and the patient made an uneventful recovery.
Table 4: Complications in two groups of CSDH patients

Click here to view


The improvement in both the group of patients at the end of 2 week was comparable and there was no statistically significant difference between them [Figure 4]. Of the nine recurrences in "with drain" group, eight patients underwent reoperation once, while one patient was re-operated twice. No patient required more than two reoperations in "with drain" group. In "without drain" group, 20 patients were re-operated once, four patients were re-operated twice, and two patients were re-operated thrice or more number of times. All patients in both groups who had a recurrence were operated (9% vs. 26%). Reoperation was done if the original neurological deficits worsened, recurred, did not improve, or a new neurological deficit occurred that needed further surgery.
Figure 4: Glasgow coma scale at discharge and follow-up at 2 weeks

Click here to view



 » Discussion Top


CSDH are common in the elderly, and treatment of CSDHs continues to be a challenge. A history of head injury is present in 60-80% of patients. This variation is possible because of the fact that most head injuries leading to CSDH are trivial; these events are easily forgotten or not actually considered important by patients. In our series, head injury was seen in 66.5% patients and most of our patients had falls. Similar were the observations in the study by Baechli et al. [8]

The existence of a "potential" subdural space has been question by many. A continuum of cells has been shown between the dura and the underlying arachnoid layer with no subdural space. A cleavage in the weakest layer of this continuum by blood, leukocytes infiltrates, etc., can result in the formation of CSDH. This cleaved cell layer forms the inner membrane subsequently. This layer has loose junctions between the cells, which is a cause of repeated hemorrhages into the subdural space, and expansion of the hematoma. The outer membrane is formed by the outer-zone of the dura-arachnoid interface. This outer membrane contains blood vessels, smooth muscle cells, red blood cells, eosinophils, collagen fiber, etc., which are not usually found in the normal dural border cell layer. The exact role of all these elements in the evolution and subsequent progression of a CSDH is not yet clearly known.

As the CSDH matures over a period of time the fibrous content increases along with a decrease in the cellular and vascular components. It may also result in some long standing CSDH membranes having calcification. The evolution of the CSDH is probably due to a complex interaction between the CSDH fluid and the outer membrane histology. One of the theories of increase in CSDH is due to the local fibrinolysis resulting in liquification of the clot.

The common clinical symptoms in CSDH are headache and hemiparesis. In our series, we noticed headache in 68.5% cases, hemiparesis in 62.5% cases, incontinence of urine in 14% cases, seizures and dementia each in 7% cases, and diplopia in 1.5% cases.

After performing a burr-hole evacuation followed by irrigation of subdural cavity with saline, the rate of reoperation varies between 2.7% and 30%. [9] In our series, the recurrence rate is in accord with results from three prospective studies. Wakai et al. have reported recurrence rates of 5% for the drain and 33% for no drain, and Tsutsumi et al. have reported rates of 3.1% and 17%, respectively. [10],[11] Santarius et al. have reported recurrence rate of 9.3% in drain group, and 24% in without drain group of CSDH. [12] In our study, the recurrence rate is 9% in patients with subdural drain and 26% in patients without drain. In their studies, Okada et al. had found treatment of CSDH, postoperative hospitalization was shorter and the recurrence was less frequent with drainage than with irrigation. [13] The use of a drain drastically reduced recurrences and mortality. [14] Our recurrence rates are very similar to those in the retrospective study by Lind et al., who identified recurrence rates of 10% for the drain and 19% for no drain, and that of Mori and Maeda who showed a recurrence rate of 9.8% for use of drain. [15],[16] These results are consistent with a positive effect of drains in prevention of postoperative recurrent collections, and their use could avoid repeated operations and additional time in hospital.

The subdural drain placement increases the approximation of the outer and inner membranes resulting in the obliteration of the subdural space. The increased wash out of the subdural hematoma and reduced fibrinolytic activity also reduces the recollection. The reduced pneumocephalus also contributes to the decreased recollection rates. [17]

When a reservoir is inserted to aspirate a recurrent subdural hematoma, the infection rate is 2.1%. [18] In our study, subdural empyema occurred in two patients in "with drain" group and in four patients in "without drain" group. The incidences of other complications like intra-cerebral hematoma formation, residual hemiparesis, seizures, pneumocephalus with mass effect, and pulmonary embolism are comparable in "with drain" and "without drain" group in our study.

We have recurrence rate of 9% in drain group and 26% in without drain group. This low recurrence rate we believe highlights the importance of postoperative closed-system drainage. We had no mishap except in one patient in whom the subdural drain was malpositioned and had migrated to parenchyma and caused intra-cerebral hematoma formation.


 » Conclusion Top


In this study, the recurrence rate of CSDH is significantly lower if subdural drain is inserted after BHD of CSDH, in comparison to those without the use of subdural drain.

The use of a subdural drain reduces the recurrence rate in CSDH without any significant increase in complications and should be routinely placed after BHD.

 
 » References Top

1.Kudo H, Kuwamura K, Izawa I, Sawa H, Tamaki N. Chronic subdural hematoma in elderly people: Present status on Awaji Island and epidemiological prospect. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1992;32:207-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Weigel R, Schmiedek P, Krauss JK. Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: Evidence based review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:937-43.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Safain M, Roguski M, Antoniou A, Schirmer CM, Malek AM, Riesenburger R. A single center′s experience with the bedside subdural evacuating port system: A useful alternative to traditional methods for chronic subdural hematoma evacuation. J Neurosurg 2013;118:694-700.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Asfora WT, Klapper HB. Case report: Treatment of subdural hematoma in the emergency department utilizing the subdural evacuating port system. S D Med 2013;66:319-21.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Kenning TJ, Dalfino JC, German JW, Drazin D, Adamo MA. Analysis of the subdural evacuating port system for the treatment of subacute and chronic subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 2010;113:1004-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Neal MT, Hsu W, Urban JE, Angelo NM, Sweasey TA, Branch CL Jr. The subdural evacuation port system: Outcomes from a single institution experience and predictors of success. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:658-64.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Abouzari M, Rashidi A, Rezaii J, Esfandiari K, Asadollahi M, Aleali H, et al. The role of postoperative patient posture in the recurrence of traumatic chronic subdural hematoma after burr-hole surgery. Neurosurgery 2007;61:794-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Baechli H, Nordmann A, Bucher HC, Gratzl O. Demographics and prevalent risk factors of chronic subdural haematoma: Results of a large single-center cohort study. Neurosurg Rev 2004;27:263-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Eggert HR, Harders A, Weigel K, Gilsbach J. Recurrence following burr hole trephination of chronic subdural hematomas. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1984;27:141-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Wakai S, Hashimoto K, Watanabe N, Inoh S, Ochiai C, Nagai M. Efficacy of closed-system drainage in treating chronic subdural hematoma: A prospective comparative study. Neurosurgery 1990;26:771-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Tsutsumi K, Maeda K, Iijima A, Usui M, Okada Y, Kirino T. The relationship of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings and closed system drainage in the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg 1997;87:870-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Santarius T, Kirkpatrick PJ, Ganesan D, Chia HL, Jalloh I, Smielewski P, et al. Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:1067-73.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Okada Y, Akai T, Okamoto K, Iida T, Takata H, Iizuka H. A comparative study of the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma - Burr hole drainage versus burr hole irrigation. Surg Neurol 2002;57:405-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Koivisto T, Jääskeläinen JE. Chronic subdural haematoma - To drain or not to drain? Lancet 2009;374:1040-1.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Lind CR, Lind CJ, Mee EW. Reduction in the number of repeated operations for the treatment of subacute and chronic subdural hematomas by placement of subdural drains. J Neurosurg 2003;99:44-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Mori K, Maeda M. Surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in 500 consecutive cases: Clinical characteristics, surgical outcome, complications, and recurrence rate. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2001;41:371-81.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Yamashima T. The inner membrane of chronic subdural hematomas: Pathology and pathophysiology. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2000;11:413-24.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Laumer R, Schramm J, Leykauf K. Implantation of a reservoir for recurrent subdural hematoma drainage. Neurosurgery 1989;25:991-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Preoperative predictive factors for surgical and functional outcomes in chronic subdural hematoma
Hyeong Woo Ro,Sang Kyu Park,Dong Kyu Jang,Wan Soo Yoon,Kyeong Sool Jang,Young Min Han
Acta Neurochirurgica. 2016; 158(1): 135
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Surgical Treatments for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Comprehensive Systematic Review
Henrique Seiji Ivamoto,Hernani Pinto Lemos,Alvaro Nagib Atallah
World Neurosurgery. 2016; 86: 399
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Treatment concept of chronic subdural haematoma according to an algorithm using evidence-based medicine-derived key factors: A prospective controlled study
Ralf Weigel,Linda Schlickum,Gerald Weisser,Joachim K. Krauss
British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015; 29(4): 538
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow