| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||2947 |
| Printed||61 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||67 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 673-680
Endoscopic transnasal approach to anterior and middle cranial base lesions
Sien Hui Tan1, Yves Brand2, Narayanan Prepageran1, Vicknes Waran3
1 Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|Date of Web Publication||6-Oct-2015|
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603 Kuala Lumpur
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
We present our experience in managing pathologies involving the anterior and middle cranial base using an endoscopic transnasal approach, highlighting the surgical technique, indications, and complications. The different types of endoscopic approaches used include the transtuberculum/transplanum, transcribiform, transsellar, and cavernous sinus approaches. The common indications include repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks (both spontaneous and post traumatic) and excision of pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, esthesioneuroblastomas, and other malignancies of the anterior cranial base. Careful reconstruction is performed with the multilayer technique utilizing fat, fascia lata, and fibrin sealant. The endoscopic transnasal approach, coupled with the present-day sophisticated neuronavigation systems, allows access to lesions in the midline extending from the cribriform plate to the craniovertebral junction. However, preoperative planning and careful selection of cases with evaluation of each case on an individual basis with regard to the lateral extension of the lesion are imperative.
Keywords: Cerebrospinal fluid leak; craniopharyngioma; endoscopy; meningioma; pituitary neoplasms; skull base
|How to cite this article:|
Tan SH, Brand Y, Prepageran N, Waran V. Endoscopic transnasal approach to anterior and middle cranial base lesions. Neurol India 2015;63:673-80
| » Introduction|| |
The minimally invasive endoscopic transnasal approach, coupled with sophisticated neuronavigation systems, allows direct access to midline skull base pathologies with less manipulation of neurovascular structures while avoiding brain retraction. The endoscope provides excellent visualization under magnification and in hidden angles, which aids in assessing the completeness of tumor dissection. In addition, the concept of team surgery and collaboration between neurosurgeons and otorhinolaryngologists play an important role. We present our experience in managing pathologies involving the anterior and middle cranial base using an endoscopic transnasal approach, highlighting the surgical technique, indications, and complications.
| » Preoperative Planning and Case Selection|| |
The endoscopic transnasal approach allows access to the midline lesions extending from the cribriform plate to the craniovertebral junction. The lateral access in the anterior and middle cranial fossa extends to the medial orbital walls, the cavernous sinus, and the medial aspect of the temporal lobe for selected lesions.
Prior to surgery, all patients undergo the following:
- A computed tomography (CT) scan for evaluation of the bony structures and bony anatomy. This is also important to assess for any potential skull defects in patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak
- A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan for preoperative diagnosis of the pathology and a better understanding of the relationship of the lesion with its surrounding structures such as the pituitary gland and stalk, the circle of Willis, the various cranial nerves, and other important structures. In addition, the consistency of a lesion can be determined based on its appearance on T2-weighted imaging. This is important because softer tumors are easily removed endoscopically compared to firm or calcified lesions
- Pituitary hormone assessment for lesions around the sella and the necessary hormonal corrections prior to surgery
- Visual field assessment for lesions that may be in direct contact with the optic nerve.
Neuronavigation is used in all our skull base surgeries as it provides better intraoperative anatomic orientation, allowing a more extensive and complete resection. It ensures that one is forewarned regarding the proximity of the important neurovascular structures in the vicinity of the surgical dissection and identifies the possible location of residual tumors. Neuronavigation is especially useful as the error due to brain shift is not a very important consideration for skull base lesions provided the operator references his or her instruments to the normal anatomical structures at the skull base.
We also routinely use devices such as a microdebrider for removal of soft tissues of the nasal passages and an ultrasonic aspirator with a long nozzle for removal of intracranial tumors.
| » Indications|| |
The common indications for endoscopic transnasal approach are as follows:
- Repair of CSF leaks (both spontaneous and post traumatic)
- Pituitary adenomas
- Esthesioneuroblastomas and other malignancies of the anterior cranial base.
| » Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks|| |
Endoscopic repair of CSF leaks has evolved so substantially that its safety and efficacy have exceeded that of traditional open methods.,,,,,, The endoscopic transnasal approach allows adequate exposure of the site of CSF leak to facilitate not only the intraoperative localization of the defect, but also to create enough working space to seal the CSF leak. The transcribriform, transtuberculum, and transsellar approaches are excellent for midline structures. However, as one moves further away from the midline skull base, the degree of difficulty, and required expertise increases. Nonetheless, endoscopic repair of almost all skull base defects is now possible through the four endonasal corridors: Transnasal, transsphenoidal, transethmoidal, and transmaxillary.
| » Pituitary Adenomas|| |
Endoscopic removal of pituitary adenomas has at least similar results in terms of tumor removal, relief of endocrinologic or visual symptoms, and cure of the underlying disease as the conventional microsurgical technique.,,,,,,, The extended endoscopic approach is particularly beneficial for managing tumors with suprasellar or parasellar extension [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. For adenomas that do not descend into the sella (fibrous, dumbbell-shaped, previous radiation or pharmacological therapy) or with cavernous sinus invasion, the endoscopic approach allows greater access and improved visualization.
|Figure 1: Pituitary adenoma: (a) Preoperative sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a 1.9 cm × 1.8 cm × 1.7 cm enhancing pituitary mass with suprasellar extension compressing the optic chiasm. (b) Postoperative sagittal MRI demonstrating complete excision of the lesion|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Pituitary adenoma in a patient with acromegaly. Preoperative sagittal (a) and coronal (b) magnetic resonance imaging showing a pituitary mass encasing the cavernous carotid on the left side. The tumor was resected using a single nostril approach. First, the sphenoid keel was visualized (c) and the sella was exposed (d). Then, the tumor was dissected from the cavernous carotid (e). The cavernous carotid can be seen after complete tumor resection (f). A small cerebrospinal fluid leak was sealed with fat and tissue glue at the end of surgery|
Click here to view
| » Craniopharyngiomas|| |
For craniopharyngiomas, the transsphenoidal approach is classically limited to the intrasellar or intra-suprasellar subdiaphragmatic tumors with the results being comparable with the microscopic and open transcranial methods.,,, With the expanded endoscopic approach now offering better visualization of anatomical structures, the risk of injury to vital structures is reduced. Nevertheless, the endoscopic technique is generally reserved for small and medium-sized suprasellar lesions located primarily in the midline without encasement of vascular structures [Figure 3]a,[Figure 3]b,[Figure 3]c].,, With sufficient experience, it is possible to access larger lesions that extend into the floor of the third ventricle provided the inferior extent reaches either the sella or the planum sphenoidale [Figure 3]d.
|Figure 3: Craniopharyngioma. Preoperative (a) sagittal and (b) axial magnetic resonance imaging showing a 4 cm × 3.4 cm × 3.4 cm midline suprasellar cystic mass extending inferiorly into the pituitary gland without encasement of vascular structures. (c) Postoperative axial computed tomography scan demonstrating complete excision of the lesion. (d) Endoscopic view of the third ventricle after removal of the tumor (craniopharyngioma) via the transplanum approach|
Click here to view
| » Meningiomas|| |
In well-chosen cases of meningiomas, the endoscopic approach attains rates of gross total resection equal to that seen in transcranial approaches.,,,,, The endoscopic technique is suitable for small meningiomas restricted to the midline with limited lateral extension, not going beyond the internal carotid artery bifurcation or the optic nerves [Figure 4]. Contraindications include an extension to the anterior clinoid processes and clear encasement of the internal carotid artery, anterior cerebral artery complex, or optic nerves. Occasionally, with large tumors and in the presence of significant brain edema, debulking is done first endoscopically, followed by a transcranial approach to achieve total excision.
|Figure 4: Planum sphenoidale meningioma. Preoperative (a) sagittal and (b) coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a 1.9 cm × 2.1 cm × 2.0 cm mass restricted to the midline and not extending beyond the internal carotid artery bifurcation or optic nerves. Postoperative (c) sagittal and (d) coronal MRI demonstrating excision of the lesion|
Click here to view
| » Esthesioneuroblastomas and other Malignancies of the Anterior Cranial Base|| |
When choosing the optimal surgical approach for neoplasms of the anterior cranial base, the tumor features and its anatomic extensions are important. A purely endoscopic transnasal approach is suitable for lesions restricted entirely in nasal passages without dural breach or lateral bony involvement. Intracranial extension of the tumor can be resected as long as it is not extensive, and it is possible to remove a cuff of the normal dura. In these cases, reconstruction is always necessary. However, the prognosis of these malignancies is poor. Huge, irregularly shaped tumors, with significant lateral extension and encasement of major vessels, or those spreading beyond the pia mater usually require a combination of endoscopic and transcranial approaches.
| » Endoscopic Equipment and Instruments|| |
Visualization is achieved using rigid-rod endoscopes 4 mm in diameter and 18 cm in length with lens angles of 0° and 30°. The electromagnetic navigation system and a recording high definition system for documentation are crucial. High-speed electric microdrills with long handpieces and microdebriders are utilized. Over the last decade, special instrumentation for skull base surgery has been developed.
Hemostasis is achieved using clips, bipolar diathermy, or absorbable hemostat packing. Alternatively, hemostatic matrices can also be used. At the end of the procedure, we usually pack both nasal cavities with nasal tampons.
| » Surgical Technique|| |
After orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia, the patient is positioned supine, and the head is placed in a Mayfield head fixation device. The nasal passages are prepared with Moffat's solution (1 ml of 1:1000 adrenaline, 2 ml of 10% cocaine, and 4 ml of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate). In our center, we adopt a “two nostril and 4-handed” technique. It is important to create a wide surgical corridor for exposure and instrument maneuverability. This is achieved by performing a unilateral inferior turbinectomy and posterior septectomy. The remaining contralateral inferior turbinate and bilateral middle turbinates are preserved to retain moisture of the nasal cavity, maintain the normal laminar flow of air and decrease postoperative crusting. The exposure required is modified according to the surgical target areas and pathology.
However, in the management of pituitary adenomas, we prefer to employ a single nostril approach. The otorhinolaryngologist manages the endoscope while the neurosurgeon uses both hands to deal with the tumor. The exception is when the operation is a redo surgery, where a binostril approach is preferred.
| » Transtuberculum/Transplanum Approach|| |
First, complete posterior ethmoidectomies are carried out whereby the bony septae are resected up to the ethmoid roof and the cribriform plate. This is followed by the drilling of the planum sphenoidale at the rostral portion of the sella. The bone covering the superior intercavernous sinus is then removed to provide access to the suprasellar segments of the tumor up to the prechiasmatic cistern [Figure 5]a and [Figure 6]. For intradural resection, the extracapsular resection of extracranial tumors can be achieved through the parachiasmatic cistern. The paraclinoid carotid artery emerges intradurally at the level of the medial opticocarotid recess (OCR) and when followed, will enable identification of the optic nerve. There should be adequate thinning of the capsule to aid in sharp dissection of the arachnoidal fibers. The boundaries are denoted by the falciform ligament and the posterior ethmoidal arteries anteriorly, the upper half of the sella posteriorly and the OCR laterally.
|Figure 5: Cadaveric dissection of the anterior skull base. (a) Overview from the clivus to the cribriform plate. Red lines indicate the area of the transcribiform approach. Green lines indicate the area of a transtuberculum/transplanum approach. (b) Close view of the cribriform plate. The dura and the anterior ethmoidal artery can be seen on the right side. Laterally, the periorbita is exposed. (c) Close view of the region of the pituitary gland: C - paraclival carotid, P – pituitary, CS - cavernous sinus, O - optic nerve, D - dura|
Click here to view
|Figure 6: Transplanum approach in the patient seen in Figure 3. (a) On both sides, a pedicled vascularized septal flap was raised, and the sphenoid sinus has been opened. Next, the planum was drilled (b) and the dura exposed (c). The tumor was identified between the optic chiasm and the pituitary (d and e) and successfully removed (f). The cerebrospinal fluid leak was closed using a multilayer seal with fat, fascia lata, tissue glue, and vascularized pedicled septal flaps|
Click here to view
| » Transcribriform Approach|| |
Complete ethmoidectomies and removal of the superior nasal septum at the skull base are performed. The lamina papyracea may be removed, but care should be taken to preserve the periorbital fascia. Upon coagulation of the anterior and posterior ethmoidal arteries, the cribriform plate and crista galli are removed. The dura is opened by incisions on bilateral sides of the falx because opening it anteriorly to the tumor can result in herniation of brain parenchyma. After resection of the tumor separately on both sides, the falx is incised to attain a single working area followed by debulking of the tumor medially [Figure 5]a, [Figure 5]b and [Figure 7]. Injury to the vessels at the interhemispheric fissure during the extracapsular dissection should be prevented. The boundaries include the frontal sinuses anteriorly, the medial wall of the orbits laterally and the anterior part of the planum sphenoidale at the level of the posterior ethmoidal arteries posteriorly.
|Figure 7: Transcribiform approach in a patient with an olfactory groove meningioma. (a) On the right, the dura and the periorbita are exposed. Olfactory fibers can be seen exiting the cribriform plate. (b) Exposing the dura on the left side after drilling to allow access to the meningioma. (c) Exposure of the tumor (meningioma). (d) Successful removal of the meningioma results in a cerebrospinal fluid leak|
Click here to view
| » The Transsellar Approach|| |
Septations of the sphenoid sinus should be resected carefully and the sinus floor can be drilled down to the level of the clivus to maximize the trajectory in the direction of the supra- and retrosellar region. The mucosa below the sella is stripped off to expose the bony anterior face of the sella. Removal of bone of the sella above the medial part of the cavernous sinus is continued in a cranial and caudal direction until the superior and inferior intercavernous sinuses are visible. If the tumor spreads to the suprasellar and lateral opticoocarotid cisterns, exposure of the medial OCR then becomes necessary. After opening of the dura with a cruciate incision, the inferior portion is maintained in a caudal position to prevent obstruction of vision by a suprasellar tumor. The posterolateral portion of the tumor is removed first, followed by the superior opening of the dura and continuation of the tumor resection superiorly and laterally [Figure 2] and [Figure 5]c. Attention is given to the area posterior to the carotid genu in the cavernous sinus, the medial OCR, and the anterior aspect of the dura at the level of the superior intercavernous sinus for tumor remnants.
| » The Cavernous Sinus Approach|| |
The medial pterygoid process is drilled to reach the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus. The sella is then opened and drilled laterally to display the carotid prominence [Figure 2]. Depending on the extension of the tumor, the opening of the dura is performed either medial or lateral to the internal carotid artery.
| » Reconstruction|| |
The fundamental objectives for reconstruction are the prevention of postoperative CSF leaks and intracranial infections, protection of neurovascular structures, and maintenance of function. Materials available include synthetic materials (dural substitute) or autologous materials (fat, mucosa or nasal septum, conchal cartilage, temporalis fascia and fascia lata). Fibrin sealants hold the graft in place and ensure a temporary watertight seal.
At our center, we prefer a multilayer closure consisting of an underlay graft, overlay graft, and overlying support [Figure 8].
|Figure 8: Repair of the cerebrospinal fluid leak after transcribiform removal of a meningioma in the patient seen in Figure 5. Multiple layers were used. (a) First, an overlay of fat stabilized with tissue glue was used. (b) Next, fascia lata with another layer of tissue glue, and finally (c) a vascularized middle turbinate flap was applied|
Click here to view
| » Underlay|| |
For small defects following the excision of a pituitary tumor, a piece of fat harvested from the periumbilical region is inserted and glued into position. For larger defects, a sheet of fascia lata is inserted into the dural layer. This fascia layer should be sufficiently large to cover the entire defect with an area of overlap. Care should be taken to ensure that this layer is laid “flat” so that a tunnel does not exist. Following this, a layer of tissue glue is used to hold it in place.
| » Overlay|| |
The underlay graft is then covered with either another layer of fascia lata or fat. This layer should cover the entire defect with sufficient overlap and is glued in place.
| » Overlying Support|| |
Finally, the defect is supported by fat followed by 2 types of absorbable hemostatic agents. The entire repair is then held in position by a vascularized turbinate flap or nasoseptal flap.
| » Complications|| |
Reported rates of postoperative CSF leaks after conventional approaches range from 13% to 29%,,, compared to those of endoscopic approaches varying from 1.5% to 6.4%. Meningitis and intracranial abscesses are also well-recognized complications. Nonetheless, the incidence rate is relatively low, ranging from 0.5% to 10%..,,, Other concerns include effectively managing vascular injuries owing to a limited working space, intraoperative neural injury, and delayed neurological deficits.
In our center, the rates of postoperative CSF leaks are minimal after careful reconstruction with the multilayer technique. Creation of a wide surgical corridor ensures adequate exposure and instrumentation to successfully secure hemostasis via the endoscopic technique. We have also developed our own device that enables the delivery of hemostatic agents with a patty accurately over the site of brisk bleeding to maintain simultaneous compression and suction for a more effective hemostasis. We believe these limitations can be overcome with experience and improvement in the surgical technique. In fact, a promising overall permanent morbidity and mortality rates of 1.8% and 0.9%, respectively, has been reported using the endoscopic approach.
| » Conclusion|| |
The endoscopic transnasal approach allows access to lesions in the anterior and central cranial fossa in most cases. However, each case must be evaluated individually with regard to the lateral extension.
One of the authors of this paper, Vicknes Waran, is supported by University of Malaya's HIR-MOHE research grant initiative (H-50001-00-A000026).
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| » References|| |
Hegazy HM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Zweig J. Transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1166-72.
Martin TJ, Loehrl TA. Endoscopic CSF leak repair. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;15:35-9.
Lanza DC, O'Brien DA, Kennedy DW. Endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid fistulae and encephaloceles. Laryngoscope 1996;106:1119-25.
Lee TJ, Chang PH, Huang CC, Chuang CC. Endoscopic treatment of traumatic basal encephaloceles: A report of 8 cases. J Neurosurg 2008;108:729-35.
Nyquist GG, Anand VK, Mehra S, Kacker A, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal repair of anterior skull base non-traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks, meningoceles, and encephaloceles. J Neurosurg 2010;113:961-6.
Bedrosian JC, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. The endoscopic endonasal approach to repair of iatrogenic and noniatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leaks and encephaloceles of the anterior cranial fossa. World Neurosurg 2014;82 6 Suppl: S86-94.
Sannareddy RR, Rambabu K, Kumar VE, Gnana RB, Ranjan A. Endoscopic management of CSF rhinorrhea. Neurol India 2014;62:532-9.
Dorward NL. Endocrine outcomes in endoscopic pituitary surgery: A literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1275-9.
Messerer M, De Battista JC, Raverot G, Kassis S, Dubourg J, Lapras V, et al.
Evidence of improved surgical outcome following endoscopy for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma removal. Neurosurg Focus 2011;30:E11.
Gondim JA, Schops M, de Almeida JP, de Albuquerque LA, Gomes E, Ferraz T, et al.
Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: Surgical results of 228 pituitary adenomas treated in a pituitary center. Pituitary 2010;13:68-77.
D'Haens J, Van Rompaey K, Stadnik T, Haentjens P, Poppe K, Velkeniers B. Fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary adenomas: A retrospective comparison with traditional transsphenoidal microsurgery in the same institution. Surg Neurol 2009;72:336-40.
Tabaee A, Anand VK, Barrón Y, Hiltzik DH, Brown SM, Kacker A, et al.
Endoscopic pituitary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2009;111:545-54.
Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F. Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: Early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1006-15.
Frank G, Pasquini E, Farneti G, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Grasso V, et al.
The endoscopic versus the traditional approach in pituitary surgery. Neuroendocrinology 2006;83:240-8.
Kabil MS, Eby JB, Shahinian HK. Fully endoscopic endonasal vs. transseptal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005;48:348-54.
Paluzzi A, Gardner P, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman C. The expanding role of endoscopic skull base surgery. Br J Neurosurg 2012;26:649-61.
Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Grahovac S, et al.
Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: A case series. J Neurosurg 2008;109:6-16.
Cavallo LM, Prevedello DM, Solari D, Gardner PA, Esposito F, Snyderman CH, et al.
Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 2009;111:578-89.
Honegger J, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Däubler B, Dörr HG. Transsphenoidal microsurgery for craniopharyngioma. Surg Neurol 1992;37:189-96.
Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base and suprasellar lesions: Indications and limitations. Neurosurgery 2009;64:677-87.
De Divitiis E, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Esposito F. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for the removal of suprasellar tumors: Part 2. Neurosurgery 2007;60:46-58.
Samii M, Tatagiba M. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas: A review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1997;37:141-9.
De Divitiis E, Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis O, Esposito I. Endoscopic transnasal resection of anterior cranial fossa meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E8.
Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Thomas A, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, et al.
Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2008;63:36-52.
Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Malkasian D, Kelly DF. Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2009;64 5 Suppl 2:269-84.
Kitano M, Taneda M, Nakao Y. Postoperative improvement in visual function in patients with tuberculum sellae meningiomas: Results of the extended transsphenoidal and transcranial approaches. J Neurosurg 2007;107:337-46.
Wang Q, Lu XJ, Ji WY, Yan ZC, Xu J, Ding YS, et al.
Visual outcome after extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2010;73:694-700.
Dusick JR, Fatemi N, Mattozo C, McArthur D, Cohan P, Wang C, et al.
Pituitary function after endonasal surgery for nonadenomatous parasellar tumors: Rathke's cleft cysts, craniopharyngiomas, and meningiomas. Surg Neurol 2008;70:482-90.
Khan OH, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal resection of skull base meningiomas: The significance of a “cortical cuff” and brain edema compared with careful case selection and surgical experience in predicting morbidity and extent of resection. Neurosurg Focus 2014;37:E7.
Cappabianca P, Esposito F, Esposito I, Cavallo LM, Leone CA. Use of a thrombin-gelatin haemostatic matrix in endoscopic endonasal extended approaches: Technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:69-77.
Waran V, Tang IP, Karuppiah R, Abd Kadir KA, Chandran H, Muthusamy KA, et al.
A new modified speculum guided single nostril technique for endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery: An analysis of nasal complications. Br J Neurosurg 2013;27:742-6.
Wagenmann M, Schipper J. The transnasal approach to the skull base. From sinus surgery to skull base surgery. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;10:Doc08.
Ensenat J, de Notaris M, Sanchez M, Fernandez C, Ferrer E, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, et al.
Endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base tumours: Technique and preliminary results in a consecutive case series report. Rhinology 2013;51:37-46.
Verillaud B, Bresson D, Sauvaget E, Mandonnet E, Georges B, Kania R, et al.
Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2012;129:190-6.
Deschler DG, Gutin PH, Mamelak AN, McDermott MW, Kaplan MJ. Complications of anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 1996;6:113-8.
Feiz-Erfan I, Han PP, Spetzler RF, Horn EM, Klopfenstein JD, Porter RW, et al.
The radical transbasal approach for resection of anterior and midline skull base lesions. J Neurosurg 2005;103:485-90.
Sekhar LN, Pranatartiharan R, Chanda A, Wright DC. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: Results and complications of surgical management. Neurosurg Focus 2001;10:E2.
Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Thomas A, Gardner P, et al.
Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: Analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 2011;114:1544-68.
Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P, et al.
Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: Anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E2.
Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, de Divitiis E. Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 2002;97:293-8.
Sankhla SK, Jayashankar N, Khan GM. Endoscopic endonasal transplanum transtuberculum approach for retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas: Operative nuances. Neurol India 2015;63:405-13
Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Farneti G, et al.
The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 2006;59 1 Suppl 1:75-83.
Waran V, Sek K, Bahuri NF, Narayanan P, Chandran H. A haemostatic agent delivery system for endoscopic neurosurgical procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011;54:279-81.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]