Atormac
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 1699  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (419 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed873    
    Printed9    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded30    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 1101-1102

Author's reply: Cell therapy for neurological disorders: The elusive goal


Department of Neurosurgery, National Brain Research Institute, Manesar, Haryana, India

Date of Web Publication12-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
Prakash N Tandon
Department of Neurosurgery, National Brain Research Institute, Manesar, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.190296

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Tandon PN. Author's reply: Cell therapy for neurological disorders: The elusive goal. Neurol India 2016;64:1101-2

How to cite this URL:
Tandon PN. Author's reply: Cell therapy for neurological disorders: The elusive goal. Neurol India [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Sep 16];64:1101-2. Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2016/64/5/1101/190296




Sir,

Thanks for sending me the comments of Dr. Sunil Pandya on our review “Cell Therapy for Neurological Disorders; the elusive goal. Neurology India 2016;64:612-623.”[1] I totally agree with every statement made by him. Yes, we had consciously avoided reference to the several malpractices prevalent in the country. The only justification for this, not simply an excuse, was that though fully aware of these malpractices, we did not wish to mention anything which was not based on objectively verified and published facts. I am afraid I was not aware of Dr. Pandya's paper of 2008. With regards to an “agency in India that can monitor such practices,” Dr. Pandya is factually correct. However, for the readers of Neurology India, let me say that Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) along with Directorate of Biotechnology (DBT) have published “Guidelines for Stem Cell Therapy” and a registry has been established at ICMR which mandates that everyone pursuing or practicing stem cell therapy should register with ICMR. Unfortunately those guidelines have not been legislated so a monitoring mechanism does not exist, nor is there any law to penalize the defaulter. I fully agree with Dr. Pandya that the Neurological Society of India, as also Neurology India, should take up this cause. One of the purposes of our review was to update the neuroscience community in the country with the available scientific evidence so as to prevent unscientific use of cell therapy and deter the un-informed hype.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest

 
  References Top

1.
Tandon PN, Pankaj S. Cell therapy for neurological disorders: The elusive goal. Neurology India 2016;64:612-23.  Back to cited text no. 1
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow