Atormac
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 3264  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (517 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  The Psychology o...
 »  The Myriad of Co...
 »  Doctors at the F...
 »  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed237    
    Printed9    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded8    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
GUEST COMMENTARY
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 375-376

Proxy war against head injury: Myriads of conflicting laws and gender-based discrimination


Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Web Publication13-May-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Manjul Tripathi
Department of Neurosurgery, Nehru Hospital, 5th Floor, Sector 12, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.258042

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


This article is the culmination of two axioms. The first is the authors' belief that the practice of medicine is, if anything, a social profession. The second is the glaring realization that conscience is the worst motivator. When we combine the two, we understand why a war needs to be waged for a stronger legislation making the wearing of helmets compulsory, and why doctors need to be at the forefront of this war.


Keywords: Gender, head injury, legislation, safety restraint
Key Message: An impassioned appeal is made to make wearing of helmets compulsory for two-wheeler drivers all over the country without any exception, and to eliminate the gender-based discrimination in the implementation of traffic laws.


How to cite this article:
Yagnick NS, Tripathi M, Mohindra S. Proxy war against head injury: Myriads of conflicting laws and gender-based discrimination. Neurol India 2019;67:375-6

How to cite this URL:
Yagnick NS, Tripathi M, Mohindra S. Proxy war against head injury: Myriads of conflicting laws and gender-based discrimination. Neurol India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 19];67:375-6. Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2019/67/2/375/258042





 » The Psychology of the Modern Rider Top


The story of the modern rider has followed the same path in a host of developing countries, reflecting the contemporary socioeconomic strata. While the anecdote here is about the Indian scene, nearly the same story can be told of countries like China, Indonesia, Philippines, and Brazil. Between 2000 and 2016, the per capita income in India rose a whopping 1,388%. The result is a visible increase in vehicles even among middle- and lower-class households. While the population has grown only 1.4% between 2000 and 2009, the number of vehicles has grown by 28.3%, and the number of deaths due to accidents by 32.4%. Fourteen deaths per hour in India are attributable to road traffic accidents (RTA) with the majority occurring among vulnerable road users.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5]

The profile of the two-wheeler rider has changed significantly with the country's development. While they were once synonymous with the image of an affordable personal mobility device for the middle-aged family men, two-wheelers have now become the step-ladder of the young. Women now occupy more than a third of the two-wheeler market in India (highlighted in commercials with the tag line: “Why should boys have all the fun!”). This change in profile has placed the brave naivety of youth at odds with the road safety laws.

Bombarded by the media, young drivers are more self-conscious than ever before. They believe in their blind invincibility or an immature nihilism, adopting statements such as “this will never happen to me,” “who cares,” “I am too good a driver to crash,” and “It is better to burn out than to fade away.” To many, their appearance matters more than their safety. A news covered by a prominent daily newspaper showed that even while holding boards to create awareness about the essentiality of helmet use among women, none of the girls were wearing a helmet. Watching their heroes in films perform daredevil stunts without helmets and emerging scratchless has its effect on the everyday rider's psyche. This has given rise to the “rescue” driver-individuals who consciously refuse to follow the helmet regulation. This rejection cuts across the lines demarcating cultural beliefs, education, economic status, and region.

Another aspect, particularly in smaller cities, is the distance of the ride. There are many riders who believe that while traversing short distances, a helmet is not needed. They do not realize that wearing a helmet is akin to wearing barrier contraception. It does not matter how long or short the sexual activity is, one needs to wear it every single time. The world over, people are in a rush to get things done, and are pressured for time. A young girl heading toward college may forget her helmet while coming down to the parking and would more commonly decide to brave the possibility of an accident than the punishment for being late to class. Nowhere in the world is conscience a sustainably strong motivator for discipline.


 » The Myriad of Contradicting Laws Top


Road traffic laws are not given the importance, they deserve. No country believes that road traffic safety should be a human right, not just for the rider but also for the vulnerable road users. This attitude is demonstrable in the Indian scenario. The Indian motor vehicles act of 1988 (third modification) was created at a time when two-wheelers were few and personal cars even fewer. With genuine foresight, the legislature created section 129, which made helmet-wearing compulsory for all two-wheeler riders except turban wearing Sikhs.

But in the 1990s, despite criticism from scientific bodies and state judiciary, the local legislature of Chandigarh, India, amended the law to exempt all women from wearing helmets, under the pressure of populist politics. In 2004, the honorable Supreme Court of India further added to the controversy by declaring helmets compulsory for all, but with a clause that local legislative bodies may make exemption for safety restraints in matters of local governance. Even when lawmakers debate who should wear a helmet and who should not, there is absence of safety specifications in the helmet design. Head injury studies have proven that only helmets with jaw guards and fastened chinstraps provide protection against head injury.[4] In price conscious developing nations, it is not uncommon to witness any headgear in the name of helmet to avoid a fine from the traffic police viz. a sports helmet, an utensil, or a mining helmet.

The efficacy of a proper head protection has been proven beyond doubt in numerous studies. For example, a study conducted by Tripathi et al., reported that out of 1,346 patients received in 9 months from two-wheeler accidents, 231 were women with most of them being pillion riders, who were not wearing a helmet at the time of the RTA. Severe head injury was reported in only 4.3% of helmeted patients, whereas in non-helmeted patients, this value was raised almost six times.[5] The real problem, therefore, has been compliance. Studies performed regarding the incidence of head injury after a strict implementation of legislation for mandatory compliance (Italy and Taiwan) of helmets have shown a significantly decreased incidence of severe head injury rates. On the other hand, the effect of repeal of legislation was studied in multiple states in the United States, which highlighted that compliance decreased by 50% despite the awareness programs being well in place.[1],[6]


 » Doctors at the Forefront of the War Top


In 2007, K. Ganpathy, a respected Neurosurgeon in Chennai, India, submitted an affidavit to the Honorable High Court. He recommended that helmet use should be made compulsory for all and the court agreed. This action probably saved more lives than he had saved in his long practice as a surgeon.[2] In many regions, lawyers opposing the legislation quoted the opinions of doctors casually and without evidence. Arguments are flown around, such as “Helmets do not provide sufficient protection,” “Helmet law will lead to decreased growth of the auto industry,” and even “Helmet wearing leads to an increase in the incidence of cervical spine injury.”

A law intended to save life should not discriminate based on gender or the person's position on the vehicle. Gender-based discrimination in safety restraints is akin to telling a lady that it is safe to jump off a plane without a parachute. The only thing worse than injustice for those who witness it is to do nothing. Neurosurgeons need to work with the police in creating awareness programs so that the police understand the importance of stricter enforcement of the already existing laws.[7] The law should force noncompliant riders to provide community services in the hospitals taking care of victims of RTAs. The community, and most importantly, doctors must demand stronger legislations, that surpass populist politics and gender-based discrimination in safety regulations.

Among the adrenaline seeking and image conscious youth, conscience is sidelined in every action. We need to be their conscience. In fact, we need to reactivate the conscience within them, because we have seen their future in our wards, and it is up to us to prevent it.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Dr. Awdhesh K Tripathi, Pediatrician, ESI Hospital, Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh), India, for his thoughtful inputs related to the article.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India. New Delhi: National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ganapathy K. Operation outside the theatre saves more lives: The Chennai helmet story. Indian J Neurotrauma 2007;4:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Helmets: A Road Safety Manual for Decision-Makers and Practitioners. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Road Accidents in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Road Transport And Highways Transport Research Wing 2009.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tripathi M, Tewari MK, Mukherjee KK, Mathuriya SN. Profile of patients with head injury among vehicular accidents: An experience from a tertiary care centre of India. Neurol India 2014;62:610-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Devi BI, Shukla DP, Bhat DI, Tripathi M, Warren A, et al. Neurotrauma care delivery in a limited resource setting - lessons learnt from referral and patient flow in a tertiary care center. World Neurosurg 2019;123:e588-e596.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Massenburg BB, Veetil DK, Raykar NP, Agrawal A, Roy N, Gerdin M. A systematic review of quantitative research on traumatic brain injury in India. Neurol India 2017;65:305-14.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow