Atormac
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 1466  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

 Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed145    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 1062--1065

Endovascular Nuances in Management of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms


1 Department of Neurosurgery, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Anaesthesia, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. M N Tejus
2684/1, 6th Main, 13th Cross, V.V Mohalla, Mysore, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.266249

Rights and Permissions

Background: Endovascular treatment of aneurysm is the accepted standard of treatment. Multiple intracranial aneurysms are frequently detected due to advances in imaging. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine aneurysm properties, management strategies, and outcome of patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms managed by endovascular approach. Materials and Methods: Data of all patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms who were managed at our institute over a period of 1 year were retrospectively studied. Data of 20 consecutive patients with single aneurysm who were endovascularly managed during the same study period were also collected. Patient demographics, intraprocedural radiation exposure, hardware used, and clinical and angiographic outcome at discharge were analyzed. Results: A total of 112 patients with intracranial aneurysm were managed during the study period, of which 11 patients had multiple intracranial aneurysms, with a total of 23 aneurysms. Incidence was more among females (63.6%). Proximal of multiple aneurysms ruptured more commonly (63.6%), and internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation was the most common site (45.4%). Of the 23 aneurysms, 18 were coiled. Seven patients had good outcome and it was found to be influenced by preoperative Hunt and Hess scale. Based on Raymond–Roy grading, 17 of 18 aneurysms (94.4%) were completely coiled; angiographic outcome was comparable in both the groups. Patients with multiple aneurysm had statistically significant high radiation exposure (4.5 vs 3.8 m SV) as compared to patients with single aneurysm (P < 0.05), but had low stochastic effect. In patients with aneurysm involving different arterial compartment, 66.2% required change of microcatheter. Conclusion: Single-stage treatment of multiple aneurysm can be achieved with good outcome. Even though radiation exposure is high while treating multiple aneurysm as compared to single aneurysm cases, its stochastic risks are low.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow