Atormac
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 933  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (729 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Neural Network f...
 »  Animal Studies o...
 » the Hypothesis
 » Discussion
 » Limitations
 »  Summary and Pers...
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed264    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded23    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 1220-1224

Nucleus Accumbens as a Novel Target for Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Addiction: A Hypothesis on the Neurochemical and Morphological Basis


Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago,IL, USA

Date of Web Publication19-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Prasad Vannemreddy
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.271239

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


Addiction is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Apart from psychotropic substances, alcohol and nicotine remain the common addictive materials responsible for the majority of deaths. Conventional conservative therapies are beneficial to certain populations, but the majority may require interventional treatments such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) in view of increasing mortality from drug abuse in recent years. We present a brief review on a novel neuromodulation target of the nucleus accumbens (NA) and its promising role in the management of addiction. The three stages of the addiction cycle are known to be mediated by dopaminergic pathways located in the mesolimbic dopamine system with connections to dorsal striatum, extended amygdala, cingulate gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex, prefrontal cortex, and ventral tegmental area. Recent advanced neuroimaging in humans and several animal studies demonstrated NA to be a vital anatomical area modulating this network. DBS of NA in animals reduced addictive behavior to alcohol, cocaine, and other narcotics significantly. The accidental observation that DBS of NA for psychiatric illnesses induced relief from addiction to alcohol and smoking has encouraged further research of late. Bilateral NA ablative surgery had shown nonrelapse in more than 50% of cases. Small series of patients have benefited so far from DBS of NA, but larger numbers are required to provide evidence-based treatment. The modulation of dopaminergic pathways through DBS of NA as a valid treatment for addiction is substantiated extensively by animal studies and also in a few clinical studies. However, this needs to be validated by a well-structured, multicenter controlled study in a large group of patients suffering from substance abuse.


Keywords: Addiction, alcoholism, deep brain stimulation, neuromodulation, nucleus accumbens, substance abuse
Key Messages: Addiction has serious consequences on human behavior, health, economy and moral structure of society. Several conservative as well as pharmacological treatments currently in use have not reduced the problem. Deep brain stimulation has been in use for many years and its application in the modulation of the Nucleus Accumbens showed promising results in several laboratory and clinical studies. This reports supports the hypothesis that DBS of NA has potential to control serious addiction with favorable outcome.


How to cite this article:
Vannemreddy P, Slavin K. Nucleus Accumbens as a Novel Target for Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Addiction: A Hypothesis on the Neurochemical and Morphological Basis. Neurol India 2019;67:1220-4

How to cite this URL:
Vannemreddy P, Slavin K. Nucleus Accumbens as a Novel Target for Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Addiction: A Hypothesis on the Neurochemical and Morphological Basis. Neurol India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 10];67:1220-4. Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2019/67/5/1220/271239




According to World Health Organization, alcohol causes 2.5 million deaths annually and 50% of crimes related to violence. Futhermore, nearly 25% of deaths in industrialized countries are due to abuse of psychotropic substances.[1],[2]

The definition of addiction by Merriam-Webster dictionary is a “compulsive need for and use of a habit forming substance characterized by tolerance and by well-defined physiologic symptoms upon withdrawal”. There is a continued use or substance or behavior in spite of the adverse consequences[3] characterized by enduring hypersensitivity and incentive sensitization.[4] The intensive and pathological cycle representing the behavior has three interactive stages: the “binge/intoxication stage,” the “withdrawal/negative affect stage,” and the “preoccupation/anticipation stage”.[5],[6]

Anatomical substrates in the brain for these three stages are interdependent and dopamine-mediated, located in the ventral trigeminal area (VTA) for “binge intoxication”, in the extended amygdala [composed of central nucleus of amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and medial (shell) region of nucleus accumbens (NA)] for “withdrawal/negative affect stage” and the craving “preoccupation/anticipation” stage. In addition, the cricuit connecting medial prefrontal cortex, NA, and ventral pallidum plays a pivotal role. The latter craving stage is the defining feature of the addiction as a chronic relapsing disorder resulting from interactions between the striatum (dorsal and ventral parts) and the thalamus.[7]


 » Neural Network for Addiction Top


Contribution for addiction circuits comes from multiple regions and sometimes changes are seen specific to certain substances. Methamphetamine had shown long-lasting decrements in striatal dopamine transporter, not seen with cocaine or alcohol. Animal models during acute withdrawal stage of all drugs exhibited activation of corticotrophin-releasing factor in striatum.[7] Following deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus (STN), dopamine dysregulation has been observed.[8] STN metabolism decreased by cocaine administration[9] and lesions of STN decreased motivation to cocaine intake in rats.[10] DBS of NA in rats decreased alcohol consumption[11] and cocaine seeking.[12] Dopamine in striatum was increased in humans on brain images with drug induction in the region of and areas of the ventral striatum as a reward phenomenon (pleasure, euphoria, and high). The brain structures involved in all the three stages of addiction include the striatum, hippocapmpus, insula, basal frontal cortex (for craving), and dorsolateral/inferior frontal gyrus with cingulate gyrus (for disrupted inhibition). All of these areas could be construed as targets for effective DBS.[13] The claims its preferred place based on the circuit network proposed by Koob and Volkow.[7] The is located between the caudate nucleus and putamen in the basal forebrain in each hemisphere as a constituent of ventral striatum and the basal ganglia.


 » Animal Studies on Dbs of the Na in Addiction Top


DBS of NA (either core or shell) in animals reduced the drug-induced behavior significantly regarding ethanol, cocaine, and morphine.[11],[12],[14] Remarkably, the NA DBS did not produce unusual behavior or effects on water consumption. Earlier observations also supported this finding that encoding circuits in the NA were different for cocaine as opposed to natural needs like water and food.[15]

The has a core and a shell, two regions different from each other by anatomy and physiology. The core receives anterior cingulate and dorsal prelimbic projections, while the shell connects with infralimbic and ventral prelimbic cortex.[16],[17] Alcohol consumption was reduced with DBS of either of these regions, but for attenuation of cocaine habits, stimulation of the shell was only effective.[12],[18] DBS had region-specific effects and its efficacy can be improved by precise target locations in the for effective management of specific substance abusers.[12]


 » the Hypothesis Top


The as the DBS target: Anatomical network

There are two distinct morphological divisions in the NA, of animals known as the shell and core differentiated by their expression of neuropeptides and afferents.[19] The core is involved in learning-based behavior and the shell is related to the reward-seeking behavior.[20] Accordingly, different responses are elicited on simulation in rodents.[21] However, in primates this demarcation is less prominent as the shell region shrinks but has functional coordination with the core and carries the receptors for dopamine, opioids, and various other peptides unique to the shell seen in rodents.[22]

The of the NA in the regulation of motivation and reward is very important in the development of addiction.[6] The mesocortical and the mesolimbic pathways are crucial neurochemical connections operated by the addictive substances in the brain reward system. The mesolimbic pathways connect the to the VTA of the midbrain along the medial forebrain bundle mediating natural rewards as well as most substances of abuse. This process produces an increased concentration of extracellular dopamine. This dopamine activity differs between natural rewards and addictive materials as the latter induces sensitization of the dopamine transmission in the NA. In addition, dopamine activity fails to adapt in case of repeated exposures to addictive drugs.[23],[24] They exert a powerful repetitive and reinforcing stimuli.

The NA has a pivotal position both by function and anatomical connections involved in the addiction cycle engaging the VTA, lateral hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, striatum, and prefrontal lobe making it a preferred target for DBS modulating the neuroadaptive changes in addiction [Figure 1]. High-frequency (HF) DBS of NA in rodents suppressed pyramidal cell firing and activated corticostriatal inhibition along with region-specific changes in field potentials.[25] Both spontaneous and evoked LFP responses of the addiction circuits involving prefrontal, lateral orbitofrontal cortices, and mediodorsal thalamus were affected by HF DBS of NA thus proposing therapeutic effects.[26] HF DBS of NA shell or core reduced alcohol intake in self-administration rodent model significantly without altering water intake.[14]
Figure 1: Anatomical location of NA and the dopamine circuits engaged in addiction cycle (courtesy creative commons)

Click here to view


On the other hand, stimulation of the striatum did not change cocaine reinstatement, while DBS of NA significantly attenuated the addiction behavior in the rat model. Here also the stimulation did not change the reinstatement of food-seeking (normal behavior).[12]

These studies demonstrate, not propose that modulation of NA by DBS could significantly improve the addiction patterns like intake, reinstatement, and craving.

The substrate for DBS of NA in addiction

There are rapid increases in dopamine noted in association with reinforcing abuse with chronic addiction, whereas dopamine is drastically decreased during withdrawal which causes dysfunction of prefrontal, basifrontal lobes, and cingulate gyri. Neurochemical studies showed that these changes result in altered frontal lobe functions and decreased sensitivity to natural reinforcers.[27]

At present, advanced neuroimaging studies such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) demonstrated activation of the frontal lobe areas during drug intoxication or craving, especially in the area of the NA for reward, orbitofrontal cortex for motivation, and amygdalohippocampal region for memory. In addition, the increased extracellular dopamine was noted in striatum (NA region) in normal and addicted individuals upon administration of substances of abuse, while those experiencing intense effects like “high” or “euphoria” had higher levels of dopamine.[28]

Studies show that the NA plays a key role in reward processing and also in the transition from voluntary user to a compulsive drug user and relapses. Changes were noted in structure and function of the NA in both acute and long-term abuses.[7],[29],[30]

NA stimulation possibly can normalize striatal dysfunction reducing craving and promoting sensitivity to natural reinforcers. The major concern is that the reduced dopamine levels in striatum might be responsible for desensitization of natural reinforcers.[27]

DBS of NA also can modulate the dysfunctional neuronal activity between the orbitofrontal cortex and the thalamocortical circuit, as shown in electrophysiological animal studies.[25],[26] Brain imaging studies of addicted people demonstrated a decreased activity of the cingulate gyrus and prefrontal loves suggestive of altered inhibition.[27],[31] DBS could possibly modulate this metwork leading to better self-control[32] through monoamine neurotransmitters. Recent studies show that the NA shell (not core) stimulation reduced both dopamine and serotonin turnover in rodents, suggesting the possibility of multiple mechanisms playing a role.[33]


 » Discussion Top


As of now, only less than 50% of alcohol-addicted individuals can be effectively treated by de-addiction programs and new strategies to improve this outcome are lacking. Similarly, methamphetamine involving 25 million people is a global epidemic causing high mortality among youth.[34] There was a 3-fold increase in deaths from drug overdose in recent years with a marked increase in heroin abuse,[35] indicating the failure of traditional behavior and medical management methods.

Notwithstanding the experimental basis mentioned above, the utility of DBS of NA for addiction was an accidental observation in a patient who had bilateral DBS for agoraphobia with panic attacks. The patient abstained from drinking after surgery and the authors reviewed their experience for similar incidents.[36] Three of 10 patients (30%) who had DBS of NA (for Tourette's syndrome, obsessive compulsive disorder, and anxiety disorders) stopped smoking without any necessity for supportive treatment, which is far superior to the intentional abstinence of 9% reported in general population.[37],[38] Another report of a patient with nicotine addiction followed.[39]

In a pilot study, Muller et al. demonstrated significant long-lasting effects of NA DBS in five individuals with alcohol addiction.[40],[41] Intraoperative recording of LFP supported the data earlier reported from fMRI, as alcohol-related cues generated changes in the NA.[42] Cognitive tasks were recorded on positron emission tomography scan in another patient with and without DBS of NA. Without stimulation, the patient demonstrated higher risk-taking pattern in a gambling paradigm supporting previous observations that alcohol addiction induces negative effects on reward processing. DBS of NA reversed this behavior to a normal response.[43] A similar reversal of alcohol induced dysfunction in the NA was observed by Kuhn et al. utilizing on and off DBS.[44]

NA stimulation was also effective in heroin addiction not only during active DBS but after explantation also; the therapeutic effect continued for several months.[45],[46] A recent review of experience reported by Muller et al. recounted follow-ups on five patients for 8 years with affirmative abstinence from cigarette smoking in all cases.[47] However, the largest experience with NA comes from a study of bilateral ablative surgery in 272 patients with heroin addiction from China, which had shown a nonrelapse rate of 50% in a sample of 150 patients.[48] This study had to be terminated in view of ethical issues confronted by the authors.

DBS is reversible, unlike lesion surgery, and has been in clinical practice for over two decades with acceptable risks related to the procedure and the current technology. The negative impact of addiction on society and economic burden are far greater compared to these adverse events. Several ethical issues (similar to those experienced by the Chinese study) might play major role in popularizing this treatment, but the loss of life and function as well as the the high failure rates of the existing therapeutic options must also be considered.


 » Limitations Top


The experience on DBS of NA has been limited to case reports [Table 1], which unfortunately do not provide a strong enough evidence to analyze conclusively. The Chinese study, on the other hand, although terminated due to ethical issues, offers strong support to the therapeutic possibilities of neuromodulation of NA in patients with addiction. The review provided here is aimed to stimulate further studies in neuromodulation of NA as a beneficial therapeutic option to control addiction to harmful substances including nicotine, alcohol, cocaine, heroin, and amphetamines.
Table 1: Literature on DBS of NA

Click here to view



 » Summary and Perspective Top


The incidence of substance abuse and mortality associated with addiction has been on the rise globally with serious implications on growth and the development of young populations. The present-day therapeutics have high relapse rates. DBS has acceptable risks and has been in clinical use for two decades. In addition, the technology is rapidly evolving towards better safety. Experimental evidence and advanced neuroimaging techniques implicate dopaminergic pathways in addiction, attributing pivotal role to NA based on its anatomical and physiological connections with prefrontal/basifrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and striatum. The NA was shown to respond to stimulation to control drug-seeking behavior while normal food and water-seeking pattern remains unaffected. Limited case series of DBS performed for addiction and nonaddiction demonstrated the encouraging role of NA in promoting nonrelapse and abstinence without any additional requirement for behavioral and pharmacological treatment. However, structured multicenter studies in larger groups of patients are required to establish evidence for DBS of NA in the management of addiction. The hypothesis that NA modulation alters the dopaminergic pathways of the addiction cycle supports such a therapeutic option.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018: Executive summary. World Health Organization; 2018.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1993;270:2207-12.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Angres DH, Bettinardi-Angres K. The disease of addiction: Origins, treatment, and recovery. Dis Mon 2008;54:696-721.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008;363:3137-46.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug abuse: Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 1997;278:52-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Koob GF, Le Moal M. Plasticity of reward neurocircuitry and the “dark side” of drug addiction. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:1442-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010;35:217-238.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Pierce RC, Vassoler FM. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of addiction: Basic and clinical studies and potential mechanisms of action. Psychopharmacology 2013;229:487-91.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Uslaner JM, Crombag HS, Ferguson SM, Robinson TE. Cocaine induced psychomotor activity is associated with its ability to induce c-fos mRNA expression in the subthalamic nucleus: Effects of dose and repeated treatment. Eur J Neurosis 2003;17:2180-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Baunez C, Dias C, Cador M, Amalric M. The subthalamic nucleus exerts opposite control on cocaine and 'natural' rewards. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:484-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Henderson MB, Green AI, Bradford PS, Chau DT, Roberts DW, Leiter JC. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens reduces alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats. Neurosurg Focus 2010;29:E12.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Vassoler FM, Schmidt HD, Gerard ME, Famous KR, Ciraulo DA, Kornetsky C, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine priming-induced reinstatement of drug seeking in rats. J Neurosci 2008;28:8735-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Luigjes J, van den Brink W, Feenstra M, van den Munckhof P, Schuurman PR, Schippers R, et al. Deep brain stimulation in addiction: A review of potential brain targets. Mol Psychiatry 2012;17, 572-83.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Knapp CM, Tozier L, Pak A, Ciraulo DA, Kornetsky C. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens reduces ethanol consumption in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2009;92:474-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Carelli RM, Ijames SG, Crumling AJ. Evidence that separate neural circuits in the nucleus accumbens encode cocaine versus 'natural' (water and food) reward. J Neurosci 2000;20:4255-66.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Heimer L, Alheid GF, de Olmos JS, Groenewegen HJ, Haber SN, Harlan RE, et al. The accumbens: Beyond the core-shell dichotomy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1997;9:354-81.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zahm DS. An integrative neuroanatomical perspective on some subcortical substrates of adaptive responding with emphasis on the nucleus accumbens. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000;24:85-105.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Vassoler FM, White SL, Hopkins TJ, Guercio CA, Espallergues J, Berton O, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine reinstatement through local and antidromic activation. J Neurosci 2013;33:14446-54.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Meredith GE, Pattiselanno A, Groenewegen HJ, Haber SN. Shell and core in monkey and human nucleus accumbens identified with antibodies to calbindin-D28k. J Comp Neurol 1996;365:628-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Goto Y, Grace AA. Limbic and cortical information processing in the nucleus accumbens. Trends Neurosci 2008;31:552-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lopez J, Almaguer W, Perez H, Frey JU, Bergado JA. Opposite effects of shell or core stimulation of the nucleus accumbens on long-term potentiation in dentate gyrus of anesthetized rats. Neuroscience 2008;151:572-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Sturm V, Lenartz D, Koulousakis A, Treuer H, Herholz K, Klein JC, et al. The nucleus accumbens: A target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive- and anxiety-disorders. J Chem Neuroanat 2003;26:293-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Wise RA, Leone P, Rivest R, Leeb K. Elevations of nucleus accumbens dopamine and DOPAC levels during intravenous heroin self-administration. Synapse 1995;21:140-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Philibin SD, Hernandez A, Self DW, Bibb JA. Striatal signal transduction and drug addiction. Front Neuroanat 2011;5:60.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
McCracken CB, Grace AA. High-frequency deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens region suppresses neuronal activity and selectively modulates afferent drive in rat orbitofrontal cortex in vivo. J Neurosci 2007;27:12601-10.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
McCracken CB, Grace AA. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation produces region-specific alterations in local field potential oscillations and evoked responses in vivo. J Neurosci 2009;29:5354-63.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ. The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: Brain circuits and treatment strategies. Neuropharmacology 2004;47:3-13.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Wong C, et al. Reinforcing effects of psychostimulants in humans are associated with increases in brain dopamine and occupancy of D(2) receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;291:409-15.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Chen BT, Hopf FW, Bonci A. Synaptic plasticity in the mesolimbic system. Ann NY Acad Sci 2010;1187:129-39.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Russo SJ, Dietz DM, Dumitriu D, Morrison JH, Malenka RC, Nestler EJ. The addicted synapse: Mechanisms of synaptic and structural plasticity in nucleus accumbens. Trends Neurosci 2010;33:267-76.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Lubman DI, Yücel M, Pantelis C. Addiction, a condition of compulsive behavior? Neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence of inhibitory dysregulation. Addiction 2004;99:1491-502.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Lujan JL, Chaturvedi A, McIntyre CC. Tracking the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Biosci 2008;13:5892-904.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sesia T, Bulthuis V, Tan S, Lim LW, Vlamings R, Blokland A, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell increases impulsive behavior and tissue levels of dopamine and serotonin. Experiment Neurol 2010;225:302-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Panenka WJ, Procyshyn RM, Lecomte T, MacEwan GW, Flynn SW, Honer WG, et al. Methamphetamine use: A comprehensive review of molecular, preclinical and clinical findings. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;129:167-79.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. Overdose death rates 2015. Available from: www.samhsa.gov/data/population-data-nsduh. [Last accessed on 2017 Oct].  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Huff W, Lee S, Koulousakis A, Klosterkoetter J, et al. Remission of alcohol dependency following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: Valuable therapeutic implications? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2007;78:1152-3.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Kuhn J, Bauer R, Pohl S, Lenartz D, Huff W, Kim EH, et al. Observations on unaided smoking cessation after deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. Eur Addict Res 2009;15:196-201.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Schumann A, Hapke U, John U. Intentionally reduced smoking among untreated general population smokers: Prevalence, stability, prediction of smoking behaviour change and differences between subjects choosing either reduction or abstinence. Addiction 2003;98:1101-10.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Mantione MW, van de Brink PR, Denys SD. Smoking cessation and weight loss after chronic deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. Therapeutic and research implications: Case report. Neurosurgery 2010;66:E218.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Muller UJ, Sturm V, Voges J, Heinze HJ, Galazky I, Heldmann M, et al. Successful treatment of chronic resistant alcoholism by deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens:First experience with three cases. Pharmacopsychiatry 2009;42:288-91.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Muller UJ, Voges J, Steiner J, Galazky I, Heinz HJ, Moller M, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for the treatment of addiction. Ann NY Acad Sci 2013;1282:119-28.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Heinze HJ, Heldmann M, Voges J, Hinrichs H, Marco-Pallares J, Hopf JM, et al. Counteracting incentive sensitization in severe alcohol dependence using deep brain stimulation of the Nucleus accumbens: Clinical and basic science aspects. Front Hum Neurosci 2009;3:22.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Heldmann M, Berding G, Voges J, Bogerts B, Galazky K, Muller U, et al. Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens region in alcoholism affects reward processing. PLoS One 2012;7:e36572.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Kuhn J, Grundler TO, Bauer R, Huff W, Fischer AG, Lenartz D, et al. Successful deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in severe alcohol dependence is associated with changed performance monitoring. Addict Biol 2011;16:620-3.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Zhou H, Xu J, Jiang J. Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens on heroin-seeking behaviors: A case report. BPS 2011;69:e41-2.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Valencia-Alfonso CE, Luigjes J, Smolders R, Cohen MZ, Levar N, Mazaheri A, et al. Effective deep brain stimulation in heroin addiction: A case report with complementary intracranial electroencephalogram. Biol Psychiatry 2012;71:e35-7.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Muller UJ, Sturm V, Voges J, Heinze HJ, Galazky I, Buntjen L, et al. Nuclesaccumbens deep brain stimulation for alcohol addiction-safety and clinical long term results of a pilot trial. Psychopharmacology 2016;49;170-3.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Li N, Wang J, Wang X, Chang CW, Ge S, Gao L, et al. Nucleus accumbens surgery for addiction. World Neurosurg 2013;80:S28.  Back to cited text no. 48
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow