Atormac
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 426  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (3,884 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 » Imaging Modalities
 » Technique
 »  Course of Major ...
 »  Examples of Entr...
 »  Infective Neurop...
 »  Inflammatory Neu...
 » Conclusion
 »  References
 »  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed913    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
NI FEATURE: CENTS (CONCEPTS, ERGONOMICS, NUANCES, THERBLIGS, SHORTCOMINGS) - COMMENTARY
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 125-134

Magnetic resonance neurography and ultrasonogram findings in upper limb peripheral neuropathies


1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication23-Jan-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Deep N Srivastava
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.250701

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


Peripheral neuropathy is defined as any disease or damage to the peripheral nerves. Imaging modalities are emerging as a complementary tool of choice for diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies. This has been made possible by the advent of high-resolution ultrasound, higher field strength magnets, better surface array coils, and superior software. In addition, imaging plays a pivotal role in deciding the management. They help in determining the continuity and course of the nerve, thereby helping in the pre-surgical mapping of nerve. Imaging studies also help in prognosticating the recovery by determining the event to be acute or chronic. This article describes the imaging findings of various neuropathies affecting upper limb peripheral nerves, broadly categorized as traumatic and non-traumatic. The non-traumatic group is further divided as entrapment, infective, inflammatory and tumors.


Keywords: MR neurography, neuropathy, ultrasonogram
Key Message: The imaging findings of various neuropathies affecting the upper limb peripheral nerves are described. They may either be of traumatic or non-traumatic origin. The latter group is further divided into entrapment, infective, inflammatory and tumor-related neuropathies.


How to cite this article:
Aggarwal A, Jana M, Srivastava DN, Sharma R, Gamanagatti S, Kumar A, Kumar V, Malhotra R, Garg K. Magnetic resonance neurography and ultrasonogram findings in upper limb peripheral neuropathies. Neurol India 2019;67, Suppl S1:125-34

How to cite this URL:
Aggarwal A, Jana M, Srivastava DN, Sharma R, Gamanagatti S, Kumar A, Kumar V, Malhotra R, Garg K. Magnetic resonance neurography and ultrasonogram findings in upper limb peripheral neuropathies. Neurol India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 25];67, Suppl S1:125-34. Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2019/67/7/125/250701




Peripheral neuropathy is defined as any disease or damage to the peripheral nerves. Though the diagnosis is predominantly clinical (which includes history, clinical examination, and electrodiagnostic tests),[1] the role of imaging studies is increasing for various reasons. Imaging provides the spatial resolution of the nerve and helps to determine the primary pathology. It gives the exact site of pathology with a high-resolution depiction of nerves. It establishes the continuity of the nerve and prognosticates the management by determining the event to be acute or chronic. The primary modalities available for nerve imaging are a high-frequency ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). With the advent of highly focused ultrasound, high tesla MRI scanners and dedicated coils, the specificity and sensitivity of these modalities for establishing the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies have increased manifold. In the current article, we will limit ourselves to the discussion of peripheral neuropathies involving the upper limb.


 » Imaging Modalities Top


Ultrasonogram

For imaging of nerves, high-frequency ultrasound is required (usually above 12–14 Hz). Evaluation with ultrasound gives a flexible field of view and the pathological site can be readily compared to the normal site. The entire extent of the nerve can be assessed in one go in a short duration of time and multifocal pathologies can also be picked. Ultrasonogram (USG) is cheap and far more convenient to the patient. It also allows for real-time dynamic imaging. However, it depends on the operator's skill. In addition, its sensitivity markedly decreases in conditions of dense scarring and calcification or when the nerve is very deep-seated.

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI has a very high inherent soft tissue contrast; thus, it detects subtle signal abnormalities on T2-weighted (T2W) sequence. Hence, MRI is more specific and sensitive than ultrasound in detecting peripheral neuropathies.[2]

The interobserver and intraobserver variation is significantly low with MRI and provides more objective assessment, unlike USG. Additionally, secondary muscle denervation changes are better depicted on MR examinations (which has a role in deciding the management).[3]

Muscle atrophy with fatty replacement signifies chronic denervation and either conservative management or tendon transfer would be the treatment of choice. On the other hand, in acute denervation, the patient is managed aggressively to revert the changes. However, MRI is an expensive investigation and requires a longer duration than a USG. Moreover, only a limited region can be evaluated at a time. Thus, the chances of missing a multifocal or bilateral pathology are higher.


 » Technique Top


Ultrasonogram

A high-frequency linear transducer (12–14 Hz) should be used for evaluation of peripheral nerves. The entire course of the nerve should be screened to detect a multifocal pathology and comparison should be done with the other limb.

Magnetic resonance imaging

Higher strength scanners (3T) should be preferred along with dedicated surface coil for better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The MR neurography (MRN) protocol should include T1 weighted spin echo (T1 W SE) and T2 weighted fat-saturated (T2 W FS) sequences in the axial plane and isovoxel 3-dimensional T2 weighted fat-saturated (3D T2FS) sequence, which can be utilized for making reformats in a coronal and sagittal plane. Axial plane is best for delineating the normal course of the nerve and to detect any subtle pathology, whereas reformats aid in the pre-surgical mapping of the nerve for the surgeon. Newer sequences like diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression (DWIBS) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are being increasingly used these days, essentially for response assessment.[2]

Appearance of normal nerve

Using a high-frequency ultrasound, the nerve appears as a smooth round-to-ovoid, iso-to a mildly hyperechoic structure having a fascicular pattern in a cross-sectional view. It usually accompanies a vessel along, which can be easily distinguished by putting the color flow. It can be distinguished from a muscle or tendon by tracing the nerve in its proximal or distal course. In sagittal orientation, the nerve appears as a bundle of longitudinal fibers packed in a sheath [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Ultrasonogram, longitudinal image, showing appearance of the normal nerve

Click here to view


T1W sequence is best to evaluate the morphology of the nerve on MRI. It is isointense to muscles, round-to-ovoid smooth structure having intrafascicular fat and surrounded by a thin rim of perineural fat. The peripheral nerves are typically seen in the interfacial plane between the muscles accompanying a vessel [Figure 2]. On fluid sensitive fat-suppressed T2W sequence, the nerve is isointense to mildly hyperintense to the surrounding muscles. Various curved reformats can be made to depict the entire extent of the nerve by acquiring isovoxel 3D sequences.
Figure 2: (a) T1w SE sequence showing appearance of the normal nerve; (b) Zoomed image shows nerve fascicles enclosed by perineurium, (c) fatty infiltration suggesting chronic denervation seen in posterior compartment muscles of the forearm

Click here to view


Radiological features suggesting abnormality in a nerve

Abnormal signal intensity/echogenicity of the nerve

The nerve is abnormal when it becomes hypoechoic on USG or abnormally T2 hyperintense on MRI as the nerve fascicles tend to gain fluid signal [Figure 3]a. Various theories have been proposed for such an appearance-like vascular congestion, blockade of axoplasmic flow leading to abnormal proximal accumulation of endoneurial fluid, and distal Wallerian degeneration changes.[4] When the disease is severe, the nerve becomes hypointense on T2 at the site of pathology and hyperintense both proximal and distal to it. This is known as the triple B sign (bright, black, and bright).[2]
Figure 3: (a) T2WFS SE sequence shows abnormal signal intensity (arrow) of the median nerve suggestive of neuropathy; (b) Hyperintensity seen in flexor carpi ulnaris suggestive of acute denervation due to ulnar neuropathy (bold arrow)

Click here to view


Abnormal morphology of the nerve

The normal fascicular pattern of the nerve can be visualized on MRN. The nerve loses its fascicular pattern when it becomes pathological. The surrounding perineural fat can also become scarred or effaced or inflamed in neuropathy.

Change in the caliber of the nerve

The nerve usually becomes enlarged to form a neuroma at the site of pathology, as the fibers tend to regenerate by growing in all directions. The nerve can also show atrophy distal to the site of pathology.

Loss of continuity of the nerve

This usually occurs in traumatic neuropathy when the nerve gets transected either partially or completely, thereby leading to a gap between the transected ends.

Associated surrounding inflammation

This is usually encountered in traumatic neuropathy wherein there is adjacent T2 hyperintensity with loss of normal architecture of soft tissue around the nerve.

Denervation

Group of muscles supplied by a nerve show changes of denervation when their supplying nerve is pathological. When the injury is acute, there is edema in muscles seen as T2 hyperintensity [Figure 3]b. When it is subacute, it shows both changes of edema and beginning of fatty infiltration. When the injury had occurred in the remote past, there is atrophy of muscles with fatty infiltration.

Low fractional anisotropy

Recent studies have established the role of DTI in peripheral neuropathy. Any normal nerve would have a high fractional anisotropy (FA) value as they show increased free water diffusion in one direction. Any disruption or injury to the nerve would restrict this directional preference of diffusion leading to a reduction in FA values. Normalization of FA value post-treatment indicates recovery. Thus, DTI plays a pivotal role in response assessment.[5]

Apparent diffusion coefficient values

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values help to differentiate malignant and benign nerve sheath tumors. Benign tumors depict ADC values in the range of 1.1–2 × 10-3 mm2/s whereas malignant tumors depict values ranging from 0.7–1.1 × 10-3 mm2/s. In addition, a serial increase of ADC values post-treatment indicates recovery, thereby helping in response assessment.[5]


 » Course of Major Nerves Top


Median nerve

The median nerve is one of the major peripheral nerves of the brachial plexus formed by the median root of the medial cord and lateral root of the lateral cord, containing fibers from all the roots (C5-T1). It descends in the arm in close relation to the brachial artery, lateral to it in the upper arm then crosses in the mid-arm to run medial to the artery in the lower arm, lying superficial to the brachial muscle. It courses between the two heads of pronator teres to enter the anterior compartment of the forearm via the cubital fossa. In the upper forearm, the median nerve gives its major muscular branch, anterior interosseous nerve. Thereafter, it runs between flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis to finally enter the carpal tunnel under the flexor retinaculum. Before entering the carpal tunnel, it gives off a superficial palmar branch. In the palm, it divides into multiple muscular and digital branches [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Diagram showing the normal course of median nerve and its branches (N – Nerve)

Click here to view


Ulnar nerve

The ulnar nerve is another major peripheral nerve of the upper limb arising from the medial cord of the brachial plexus having fibers from C8, T1. It courses on the medial side of the arm in the anterior compartment. At the junction of upper two-third and lower one-third of the arm, it pierces the medial intermuscular septum to enter the posterior compartment. It crosses posterior to the medial epicondyle (cubital tunnel) to enter the forearm. In the proximal forearm, it again enters the anterior compartment by coursing between the two head of flexor carpi ulnaris. Thereafter, it runs medially superficial to flexor carpi ulnaris. It enters the palm superficial to the carpal tunnel in the Guyon canal. It terminates by dividing into superficial and deep branches in the palm [Figure 5].[1],[6]
Figure 5: Diagram showing the normal course of ulnar nerve and its branches (N – Nerve)

Click here to view


Radial nerve

The radial nerve is the third major peripheral nerve of the brachial plexus arising from the posterior cord from fibers C5-T1. It exits the axilla by coursing dorsal to the brachial artery runs between lateral and medial bellies of the triceps muscle. Thereafter, it runs deep, at the surface of the humerus in the spiral (radial) groove, to come to the posterolateral aspect of the arm. At the junction of upper two-third and lower one-third of the arm, the nerve pierces the intermuscular septum to enter the anterior compartment of the arm. It enters the cubital fossa laterally to reach the forearm by piercing the supinator muscle (subsequently called the posterior interosseous nerve). Before piercing the intermuscular septum, the radial nerve gives off the superficial radial nerve which courses superficially with the radial nerve to supply the dorsum of palm. Posterior interosseous nerve enters the posterior compartment to supply its muscles [Figure 6].
Figure 6: Diagram showing the normal course of radial nerve and its branches (N – Nerve)

Click here to view


Classification of neuropathy

The median, radial, and ulnar nerves may be affected by various peripheral neuropathies, each of which may be categorized according to its cause, as:

  1. Traumatic neuropathy
  2. Nontraumatic neuropathy


    1. Entrapment
    2. Infective
    3. Inflammatory
    4. Tumor.


Traumatic neuropathy

Peripheral nerve is a collection of axonal fibers surrounded by myelin sheath, which help in the transfer of information from the brain and spinal cord to the rest of the body. These nerves are fragile and can be easily damaged by trauma. The various modes of trauma include sharp cut injury, blunt trauma as in laceration or contusion, iatrogenic or electrical injury, etc. The myelin sheath surrounding the axon is called endoneurium and is composed of Schwann cells and loose connective tissue. Multiple such axons combine to form fascicles, which are surrounded by another connective tissue covering called the perineurium. Multiple such fascicles are further surrounded by loose connective tissue called the epineurium.[7]

Depending on the severity of injury, nerve injuries are classified by Seddon as neuropraxia (when there is damage to myelin with maintained axonal length), axonotmesis (damage to axonal fibers with maintained myelin or connective tissue sheath), and neurotmesis (when there is disruption of axonal fibers with damage to myelin or connective tissue sheath).[8] Neuropraxia is the milder form of injury which recovers by itself, hence conservative management is recommended for this form of injury. Axonotmesis is a relatively severe form of injury, in which the axon undergoes Wallerian degeneration. A good recovery with time is expected with conservative management in such cases. On the other hand, neurotmesis is the most severe form of injury, which requires surgical management and has a dismal prognosis as it involves complete discontinuity of axons and the myelin sheath.

Any nerve injury can lead to neuroma formation, which is a bunch of disorganized neural tissue along with fibrosis. This neuroma is called 'neuroma in continuity' when the continuity of the nerve is maintained [Figure 7]. It can be of spindle shape (if it occurs centrally and is having an intact perineurium) or may be a lateral neuroma (if it is present eccentrically after partial discontinuity of the perineurium occurs). When the neuroma occurs in a completely transacted nerve, it forms an end neuroma [Figure 8]. MRI can aid in differentiating between axonotmesis and neurotmesis on the basis of nerve and muscle signal intensity characteristics at different time intervals after the nerve injury.[9]
Figure 7: Posttraumatic median and radial nerve neuroma. (a) Clinical photograph showing gross atrophy of muscles of right forearm. (b) SE T2 W axial fat suppressed images showing both median and radial nerve neuromas (arrows) with marked T2W hyperintensity (c) T2 hyperintensity in the posterior compartment (supplied by the radial nerve) and anterolateral compartment muscles (supplied by the median nerve) suggestive of denervation changes. (d) Coronal STIR image shows similar findings of both nerve neuromas. (e and f) Sonogram showingmarked thickening with altered echogenicity of the median nerve and radial nerve with neuroma formation in transverse and sagittal plane, respectively

Click here to view
Figure 8: Posttraumatic median nerve end neuromas. (a-c) 3D PD VISTA images showing (a) normal caliber and signal intensity of the median nerve proximal to the injury site; (b) globular swelling with altered signal intensity of the median nerve at the injury site; (c) The nerve could not be traced for next few sections and the nerve reappears with a neuroma formation distally suggestive of discontinuity in the nerve with neuroma formation on either side, (d) STIR Coronal (thin) image showing the neuroma at either end of the transected nerve, (e) Longitudinal sonogram showing the two end neuromas (arrows) with a gap between the two ends

Click here to view


A major role of imaging (USG and MRI) in traumatic neuropathies is to correctly determine the exact site of involvement. Imaging studies also help in establishing the continuity of the nerve. If the nerve is discontinuous, it is possible to determine if there is neuroma formation. The type of neuroma can also be ascertained. The gap between the two ends of a completely transacted nerve can be determined. It is also helpful in surgical planning — whether primary nerve repair will be possible or nerve reconstruction with grafting will be required. Nerve injuries, if managed early, can prevent a permanent disability.

Entrapment neuropathies

Peripheral nerves are prone to get compressed at the following sites: (a) When they course through the fibro-osseous or fibromuscular tunnel, (b) while piercing through the muscle, (c) when some anatomic variation is seen, (d) when the retinacula or the fibrous tissue thickens either due to overuse or because of age-related degeneration, (e) due to adjoining mass lesion (ganglion, synovial cyst, and tumors), or fractures or dislocation.[10],[11] Various clinical entities are described according to the site of compression of the nerve.

The main role of imaging in entrapment neuropathies is to determine the exact site of compression as neurophysiological studies only give an approximate idea of the location of compression. It is also possible to find the cause of entrapment to determine the feasibility of surgical intervention, e.g., if any mass lesion or a thickened retinacula causes compression of the nerve.


 » Examples of Entrapment Neuropathies Top


Median nerve

Median nerve can get entrapped at the supracondylar region of distal humerus (named the supracondylar process syndrome) due to the presence of an osseous spur arising from the anteromedial surface of distal end of the humerus.[12] This is a very rare site of entrapment with an incidence rate of 0.5%. A fibrous band, called the ligament of Struthers, may be seen joining this osseous spur (supracondylar process) and the medial epicondyle, thereby forming a fibro-osseous tunnel in which the nerve gets entrapped.[13]

Pronator syndrome

Distally, the nerve can get entrapped between the two heads of pronator teres;[14],[15] or beneath the biceps aponeurosis which is called lacertus fibrosis; or, by the thickened proximal edge of flexor digitorum superficialis when it enters the forearm, which is called as the pronator syndrome. Patients typically complain of forearm pain which worsens with pronation/supination.[14] Rarely, the median nerve may get entrapped under the sublime bridge (tendinous arch between the radial and humeral heads of the flexor digitorum superficialis).[16]

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel forms the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb, having a prevalence of 3%. The compression of the median nerve when it enters the palm beneath the flexor retinaculum in the carpal tunnel is called carpal tunnel syndrome. This occurs whenever the pressure within the carpal tunnel increases. This may be due to systemic disorders like diabetes and hypothyroidism, or due to the presence of a mass either within the nerve or in the surrounding vicinity like a ganglion, cyst, lipoma, heterotopic calcification, fibrolipomatous hamartoma, etc.[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] Patients present with classical clinical complaints of pain and paresthesia involving the radial three and a half fingers with associated thenar muscle atrophy. Diagnosis is usually clinical and imaging is required to evaluate the cause. Various parameters to diagnose this entrapment neuropathy include the flattening ratio (ratio of longitudinal to short axis diameter of median nerve at the level of hook of hamate) being greater than 3, bowing index (ratio of perpendicular distance of mid of flexor retinaculum from the line joining tubercle of trapezium and hook of hamate to the distance between tubercle of trapezium and hook of hamate) being greater than 0.14, and an abnormal T2 hyperintensity of the median nerve both proximal and distal to site of compression [Figure 9]. In addition, there is denervation of thenar muscles supplied by the median nerve.[2]
Figure 9: Median nerve entrapment in the carpal tunnel. (a) TSE T2 W axial fat suppressed image showing hyperintensity in the median nerve (arrow) in the region of carpal tunnel; (b) ganglion cyst (arrowhead) present deep to the carpal tunnel. (c) SE T1 W image showing positive flattening ratio and (d) positive bowing ratio. (e) STIR coronal (thin) image showing altered signal intensity in the median nerve and (f) the ganglion cyst (arrowhead)

Click here to view


Ulnar nerve

Cubital tunnel

This is the second most common upper limb compressive neuropathy, where the ulnar nerve is pathologically compressed beneath the cubital retinaculum, also called Osborne ligament (fibrous band connecting the medial epicondyle to olecranon process).[11],[23],[24],[25] Multiple studies have been done to evaluate MR findings in ulnar nerve compression at the elbow which demonstrate increased caliber and altered signal intensity in symptomatic patients.[26],[27],[28],[29] However, the nerve may normally show mild T2 hyperintensity at this level. Role of MR is predominantly to look for secondary causes in symptomatic patients.[30] The ulnar nerve can also get compressed under the arcuate ligament when it crosses the two heads of flexor carpi ulnaris muscle.[31]

Guyon canal

Guyon canal syndrome is a result of compression of the ulnar nerve in the piso-hamate tunnel. This canal is present at the level of the wrist and is formed by pisiform and flexor carpi ulnaris medially. The hook of hamate, extrinsic flexor tendons, and transverse carpal ligament form the lateral wall while the roof is formed by the palmar carpal ligament (with palmaris brevis, if present), and the floor by flexor retinaculum, flexor digitorum profundus, transverse carpal ligament, piso-hamate, piso-metacarpal ligaments, and opponens digiti minimi. Causes of compression of the nerve at this level could be due to the presence of lesions like a cyst, lipoma, ganglion, accessory muscles [Figure 10], and vascular lesions.[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],[42]
Figure 10: Guyon canal syndrome. (a) SE T1W axial, (b and c) TSE T2 W axial fat suppressed image and (d) PD VISTA images showing additional muscle belly of adductor pollicis (arrow) arising in the region of mid forearm and getting inserted along with adductor pollicis in palm. There is mild hyperintensity of the ulnar nerve (arrowhead) in the Guyon canal under the belly of accessory adductor pollicis; better appreciated on T2 W than PD VISTA. Pisiform (block arrow) forming the posterior wall of Guyon canal

Click here to view


Radial nerve

The radial nerve can get entrapped proximally in the axilla and arm, or distally after its division in the forearm. The most common cause of entrapment in the arm is due to fracture of the humerus at the junction of the mid and distal third of the humerus.

Radial tunnel syndrome

The nerve gets entrapped at the elbow. Various causes of this condition are a fibrous band attached to the radiocapitellar joint, the tendinous origin of extensor carpi radialis brevis, or due to the radial recurrent vessel.[43]

Supinator syndrome

It refers to the entrapment of radial nerve at the level of the proximal forearm when it courses through the arcade of Frohse, piercing the supinator muscle, and is the commonest site of entrapment. Other potential sites of compression are at the anterior capsule of the radiocapitellar joint, small recurrent vessels that cross the posterior interosseous nerve (leash of Henry), the fibrous edge of the extensor carpi radialis brevis, and the distal margin of the supinator muscle, where the posterior interosseous nerve exits the supinator tunnel.[44],[45] It is usually the posterior interosseous nerve of the radial nerve which gets compressed in supinator syndrome [Figure 11]. Since posterior interosseous nerve is a pure motor nerve, hence patient presents with wrist drop and finger drop without any sensory loss.[1],[46]
Figure 11: Posterior interosseous nerve entrapment at the level of supinator muscle (supinator syndrome). (a and b) Clinical photographs demonstrating finger drop and marked decrease in the bulk of muscles on the posterior aspect of left forearm (as compared to right forearm). (c) SE T1 W image showing marked atrophy of posterior compartment muscles with fatty infiltration (arrow). (d and e) TSE T2W axial fat suppressed images showing thickening and abnormal T2 hyperintensity in the posterior interosseous nerve (arrow) while coursing through the supinator muscle. (f) Coronal reformatted image of GRE 3D PD VISTA showing thickening and altered signal intensity of the posterior interosseous while coursing between the two heads of supinator muscle (arrow). (g and h) Sonograms, axial and longitudinal images, showing marked thickening of the posterior interosseous nerve before entering the supinator muscle with sudden change in caliber after entering the supinator muscle suggestive of the supinator syndrome

Click here to view



 » Infective Neuropathies Top


Various viral and bacterial infectious agents may cause neuropathy in which the clinical symptoms mimic those of a focal nerve disturbance. Amongst the bacterial infections, leprosy, tuberculosis, and diphtheria can involve the peripheral nerves. Amongst the viral infections, the most common infectious agents include human immunodeficiency virus, varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, poliomyelitis virus, and cytomegalovirus.[1]

In such cases, long segment nerve thickening with abscess formation may be seen. In addition, the presence of nodes at the local site also point towards an infective etiology [Figure 12].
Figure 12: Infective ulnar neuropathy at the level of elbow. (a) Clinical photograph showing clawing of right medial two fingers with mild atrophy of the hypothenar muscles. (b) TSE T2 W axial fat suppressed images showing epitrochlear lymph nodes, (c) mild thickening with altered signal of the ulnar nerve at the level of medial epicondyle of the humerus (d) STIR thin coronal image shows a long segment thickening with altered signal of the ulnar nerve (arrow). (e) Sonogram longitudinal image also shows thickened and hypoechoic ulnar nerve. (f and g) DTI images depicting low FA values at the site of pathology (proximal to site of pathology –0.54;at the site of pathology –0.36)

Click here to view



 » Inflammatory Neuropathies Top


Inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies are immune-mediated neuropathies characterized by multiple foci of demyelination and axonal degeneration of peripheral nerves. The entity chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) has not been evaluated much in the past by imaging.[47],[48],[49] On MRI, this condition would predominantly involve the proximal nerves and may have thickening or altered signal of roots or cords of the brachial plexus. There can be involvement of a solitary nerve or multiple nerves at a time at multiple sites. Inflammatory neuropathy can also arise due to constant irritation of the nerve by an implant/foreign material [Figure 13]. In such cases, long segment thickening with signal alteration of the nerve is seen which gets relieved after the removal of the foreign material. Another case of long segment thickening of the median and ulnar nerve due to electric shock is shown in [Figure 14]. Few authors advocate the administration of contrast in all cases of inflammatory neuropathies. Inflammation would lead to a disruption of the blood-nerve barrier and hence would show a thin rim enhancement on postgadolinium images.[50],[51]
Figure 13: Inflammatory median neuropathy. (a) Radiograph showing fracture both bones of the forearm. (b) TSE T2 W axial fat suppressed images showing long segment median nerve thickening (arrow) with T2 hyperintensity with altered signal of flexor pollicis longus and pronator quadratus. (c and d) STIR thin coronal image and DWIBS image show long segment of the median nerve. (e) SE T1W image showing fatty infiltration of the pronator quadratus muscle (arrow) suggestive of subacute denervation. (f) Longitudinal sonogram image showing long segment thickening of the median nerve (arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 14: Inflammatory (post electric shock) median and ulnar neuropathy. (a and b) TSE T2 W axial fat suppressed image showing a long segment thickening of both of median and ulnar nerves in the forearm without any associated change. (c and d) SE T1 W image and MPR of PD VISTA showing thickened median and ulnar nerves (arrow)

Click here to view


Mass lesions

Mass lesions of peripheral nerves can be divided into lesions that arise either from the nerve or its sheath cells, or as lesions that originate from the surrounding soft tissues, i.e., intraneural or extraneural lesions. Benign neurogenic tumors include schwannomas, neurofibromas, fibrolipomatous hamartomas, lipofibromas, encapsulated neuromas, or macrodystrophia lipomatosa. Macrodystrophia lipomatosa is one of the intraneural pathologies, which is best diagnosed by MRI, which depicts a marked enlargement of the nerve with the presence of increased intraneural fat. Malignant peripheral neurogenic lesions include malignant schwannomas, malignant triton tumors, malignant neurilemomas, neurilemosarcomas, neurofibrosarcomas, neurogenic sarcomas, and neurosarcomas.[52] Mass lesions that may originate from surrounding soft tissues include ganglia and other cysts, enlarged lymph nodes, lipomas, hemangiomas, and other benign or malignant soft-tissue tumors, as well as metastases from malignancies such as melanoma or breast cancer.

The nerve tumors appear as a well defined focal swelling of the nerve with complete loss of its fascicular pattern [Figure 15]. These have altered echogenicity or MR signal intensity and can have areas of necrosis or hemorrhage. No perineural fibrosis is visualized (as in traumatic neuroma).
Figure 15: Median nerve neurofibroma. (a-c) TSE T2 W axial fat suppressed images show normal caliber of the median nerve both proximal and distal to the site of lesion; (b) TSE T2 W axial fat suppressed images at the site of lesion showing marked T2 hyperintensity with swelling of the median nerve (arrow) in the distal forearm. No separate nerve fascicle is visualized at this level. (d) PD VISTA axial image showing the lesion to be hyperintense. (e) SE T1 W image shows a large T1 iso to mildly hyperintense fusiform mass (arrow) arising from the median nerve. (f) STIR thin coronal image demonstrating a fusiform neurofibroma of the median nerve (arrow)

Click here to view


Fibrolipomatous hamartoma is one specific condition wherein the MR findings are diagnostic without a need for biopsy. The nerve is grossly enlarged with increased intraneural fat. This condition is most commonly seen in the median nerve.[17]


 » Conclusion Top


Neuropathy is a broad term referring to the clinical presentation of sensory abnormalities (pain, paresthesia, and numbness) or motor weakness in the expected distribution of a particular nerve. With the advent of high-resolution ultrasound and higher field strength magnets having better surface array coils and superior software, these imaging modalities are emerging as the complementary tool of choice for assessment of peripheral neuropathies. In traumatic nerve injuries, the exact lesion localization is the central diagnostic step in the presurgical workup. MRN showed very high sensitivity in detection of the nerve involved with the additional advantage of delineating the exact site of involvement, secondary muscle changes, and in establishing continuity of the nerve which has a bearing on the management and on the prognosis of the nerve injury.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Andreisek G, Crook DW, Burg D, Marincek B, Weishaupt D. Peripheral neuropathies of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves: MR imaging features. Radiographics 2006;26:1267-87.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Howe BM, Spinner RJ, Felmlee JP, Frick MA. MR imaging of the nerves of the upper extremity: Elbow to wrist. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015;23:469-78.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chhabra A, Andreisek G, Soldatos T, Wang KC, Flammang AJ, Belzberg AJ, et al. MR neurography: Past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:583-91.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Cha JG, Han JK, Im SB, Kang SJ. Median nerve T2 assessment in the wrist joints: Preliminary study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 2014;40:789-95.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Chhabra A, Zhao L, Carrino JA, Trueblood E, Koceski S, Shteriev F, et al. MR neurography: Advances. Radiol Res Pract 2013;2013:809568.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sallomi D, Janzen DL, Munk PL, Connell DG, Tirman PF. Muscle denervation patterns in upper limb nerve injuries: MR imaging findings and anatomic basis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:779-84.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chhabra A, Ahlawat S, Belzberg A, Andreseik G. Peripheral nerve injury grading simplified on MR neurography: As referenced to Seddon and Sunderland classifications. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014;24:217-24.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H. Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol 1943;102:191-215.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Wessig C, Solymosi L. Sequential MR imaging of denervated muscle: Experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1427-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Schon LC. Nerve entrapment, neuropathy, and nerve dysfunction in athletes. Orthop Clin North Am 1994;25:47-59.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Spinner RJ, Amadio PC. Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity. Clin Plast Surg 2003;30:155-73.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kim S, Choi JY, Huh YM, Song H-T, Lee S-A, Kim SM, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in entrapment and compressive neuropathy--what, where, and how to see the peripheral nerves on the musculoskeletal magnetic resonance image: Part 2. Upper extremity. Eur Radiol 2007;17:509-22.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Jacobson JA, Fessell DP, Lobo LD, Yang LJ. Entrapment neuropathies I: Upper limb (carpal tunnel excluded). Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010;14:473-86.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hartz CR, Linscheid RL, Gramse RR, Daube JR. The pronator teres syndrome: Compressive neuropathy of the median nerve. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:885-90.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Seyffarth H. Primary myoses in the M. pronator teres as cause of lesion of the N. medianus (the pronator syndrome). Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand Suppl 1951;74:251-4.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tubbs RS, Marshall T, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. The sublime bridge: Anatomy and implications in median nerve entrapment. J Neurosurg 2010;113:110-2.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Spinner RJ, Scheithauer BW, Amrami KK, Wenger DE, Hébert-Blouin MN. Adipose lesions of nerve: The need for a modified classification. J Neurosurg 2012;116:418-31.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Dailiana ZH, Bougioukli S, Varitimidis S, Kontogeorgakos V, Togia E, Vlychou M, et al. Tumors and tumor-like lesions mimicking carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014;134:139-44.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Tahiri Y, Xu L, Kanevsky J, Luc M. Lipofibromatous hamartoma of the median nerve: A comprehensive review and systematic approach to evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:2055-67.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Yalcinkaya M, Akman YE, Bagatur AE. Unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome caused by an occult ganglion in the carpal tunnel: A report of two cases. Case Rep Orthop 2014;2014:589021.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Yuen A, Thomson S. Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by heterotopic ossification. J Hand Surg EurVol 2011;36:425-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hariri A, Cohen G, Masmejean EH. Venous malformation involving median nerve causing acute carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011;36:431-2.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hauptfleisch J, English C, Murphy D. Elbow magnetic resonance imaging: Imaging anatomy and evaluation. Top Magn Reson Imaging TMRI 2015;24:93-107.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Dellon AL. Musculotendinous variations about the medial humeral epicondyle. J Hand Surg Br 1986;11:175-81.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Sookur PA, Naraghi AM, Bleakney RR, Jalan R, Chan O, White LM. Accessory muscles: Anatomy, symptoms, and radiologic evaluation. Radiographics 2008;28:481-99.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Keen NN, Chin CT, Engstrom JW, Saloner D, Steinbach LS. Diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using magnetic resonance neurography. Skeletal Radiol 2012;41:401-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Britz GW, Haynor DR, Kuntz C, Goodkin R, Gitter A, Maravilla K, et al. Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, electrodiagnostic, and intraoperative findings. Neurosurgery 1996;38:458-65.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Vucic S, Cordato DJ, Yiannikas C, Schwartz RS, Shnier RC. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:590-5.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Bäumer P, Dombert T, Staub F, Kaestel T, Bartsch AJ, Heiland S, et al. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: MR neurography--nerve T2 signal increase and caliber. Radiology 2011;260:199-206.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Husarik DB, Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Jost B, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Elbow nerves: MR findings in 60 asymptomatic subjects--normal anatomy, variants, and pitfalls. Radiology 2009;252:148-56.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies at the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004;12:247-63.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Ozdemir O, Calisaneller T, Gerilmez A, Gulsen S, Altinors N. Ulnar nerve entrapment in Guyon's canal due to a lipoma. J Neurosurg Sci 2010;54:125-7.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Dimitriou C, Natsis K. Accessory abductor digiti minimi muscle causing ulnar nerve entrapment at the Guyon's canal: A case report. Clin Anat 2007;20:974-5.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Harvie P, Patel N, Ostlere SJ. Ulnar nerve compression at Guyon's canal by an anomalous abductor digiti minimi muscle: The role of ultrasound in clinical diagnosis. Hand Surg 2003;8:271-5.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Paraskevas GK, Ioannidis O, Economou DS. Anomalous muscle causing ulnar nerve compression at Guyon's canal. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012;46:288-90.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Spiess AM, Gursel E. Entrapment of the ulnar nerve at Guyon's canal by an accessory abductor digiti minimi muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1060-1.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Pierre-Jerome C, Moncayo V, Terk MR. The Guyon's canal in perspective: 3-T MRI assessment of the normal anatomy, the anatomical variations and the Guyon's canal syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 2011;33:897-903.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Dobson PF, Purushothaman B, Michla Y, England S, Krishnan MK, Tourret L. Delayed ulnar nerve palsy secondary to ulnar artery pseudoaneurysm distal to Guyon's canal following penetrating trauma to the hand. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:e75-6.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Kim SS, Kim JH, Kang HI, Lee SJ. Ulnar nerve compression at Guyon's canal by an arteriovenous malformation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;45:57-9.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Bozkurt MC, Tagil SM, Ozçakar L. Guyon canal. J Neurosurg 2004;100:168.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Pai V, Harp A, Pai V. Guyon's canal syndrome: A rare case of venous malformation. J Hand Microsurg 2009;1:113-5.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Kim DH, Han K, Tiel RL, Murovic JA, Kline DG. Surgical outcomes of 654 ulnar nerve lesions. J Neurosurg 2003;98:993-1004.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Konjengbam M, Elangbam J. Radial nerve in the radial tunnel: Anatomic sites of entrapment neuropathy. Clin Anat 2004;17:21-5.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Spinner M. The arcade of Frohse and its relationship to posterior interosseous nerve paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968;50:809-12.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Thomas SJ, Yakin DE, Parry BR, Lubahn JD. The anatomical relationship between the posterior interosseous nerve and the supinator muscle. J Hand Surg 2000;25:936-41.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders. 3rd ed. David C. Preston. ISBN: 978145572672. ANZ Elsevier Health Bookshop [Internet]. Available from: http://www.elsevierhealth.com.au/electromyography-and-neuromuscular-disorders-9781455726721.html. [Last cited on 2017 Jan 26].  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Perry JR, Fung A, Poon P, Bayer N. Magnetic resonance imaging of nerve root inflammation in the Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neuroradiology 1994;36:139-40.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Sander HW, Latov N. Research criteria for defining patients with CIDP. Neurology 2003;60:S8-15.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Duggins AJ, McLeod JG, Pollard JD, Davies L, Yang F, Thompson EO, et al. Spinal root and plexus hypertrophy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Brain 1999;122:1383-90.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Tien R, Dillon WP, Jackler RK. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the facial nerve in 11 patients with Bell's palsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:573-9.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Engström M, Thuomas KA, Naeser P, Stålberg E, Jonsson L. Facial nerve enhancement in Bell's palsy demonstrated by different gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:221-5.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Murphey MD, Smith WS, Smith SE, Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT. From the archives of the AFIP. Imaging of musculoskeletal neurogenic tumors: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999;19:1253-80.  Back to cited text no. 52
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow