Neurol India Home 
 

CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 490-

Editor's Note

J. M. K. Murthy 
 Editor, Neurology, India

Correspondence Address:
J. M. K. Murthy
Editor, Neurology
India




How to cite this article:
Murthy J. Editor's Note.Neurol India 2011;59:490-490


How to cite this URL:
Murthy J. Editor's Note. Neurol India [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 23 ];59:490-490
Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2011/59/3/490/82704


Full Text

The authors failed to respond even after several reminders. The Editorial Board also feels that the complication that the patient had following IVIg administration was most likely posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and not stroke. They should have included diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient images to support their argument that it is a case of cerebral infarct.