NI FEATURE: THE EDITORIAL DEBATE I-- PROS AND CONS
|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 7 | Page : 20--22
Peripheral nerve injuries and their surgical treatment: New perspectives on a changing scenario
Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Surgery Unit, Neurospinal Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Dr. Debora Garozzo
Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Surgery Unit, Neurospinal Hospital, Dubai
United Arab Emirates
|How to cite this article:|
Garozzo D. Peripheral nerve injuries and their surgical treatment: New perspectives on a changing scenario.Neurol India 2019;67:20-22
|How to cite this URL:|
Garozzo D. Peripheral nerve injuries and their surgical treatment: New perspectives on a changing scenario. Neurol India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 May 29 ];67:20-22
Available from: http://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2019/67/7/20/250715
Peripheral nerve injuries are usually considered rare, being presently estimated to occur in about 3% of the population who have undergone traumatic injury.,,, Yet the data in the medical literature are likely to be incomplete or incorrect, due to the current dearth of widespread epidemiological research articles. As most of the studies were perfomed in the Western world, they are inadequate to provide an overall view of the real incidence of these injuries and certainly portray a situation that is often disconnected from world-wide reality.
In recent years, a progressively increasing rate of peripheral nerve injuries has been noticed in developing countries, mostly in South-East Asia and the Arab world. During the last decades, countries such as India, Pakistan or Vietnam have seen a tremendous proliferation of motorization. Due to their cheaper cost, hordes of two-wheelers (used to transport both passengers and goods) have invaded cities populated by millions of people, swarming along their streets and offering a metropolitan scenario that leaves western tourists completely dumbfounded. This fast growing, massive motorization is usually associated with complete lack of security measures; the consequent remarkable increase in the incidence of road traffic accidents regularly leads to more and more victims. In the Arab World, the ongoing warfare afflicting countries like Libya, Syria or Yemen has generated a high percentage of gunshot injuries, mostly complex, as they often involve diverse anatomical structures (bone injuries, tendon lacerations and nerve lesions).
The above-described situations mostly involve young individuals, the majority of them being male patients at the beginning or at the peak of their productive (both professionally and personally) years. A peripheral nerve injury may cause a functional impairment (especially when it involves the upper limb), often resulting in a condition of severe disability deeply impacting the patient's life: a wrist drop due to a radial nerve injury, a loss of the hand dexterity due to a median or an ulnar nerve injury and especially a brachial plexus palsy make manual work impossible. It can be easily inferred that peripheral nerve injuries present a remarkable impact on the individuals as well as the community they reside in, especially in developing countries, as these young individuals become an additional burden for their families already weighed down by other social issues.
Some peripheral nerve injuries may spontaneously recover but the damage on the nerve is irreversible in the majority of these cases; for these patients, surgery becomes the only hope to restore function in the affected limb. Moreover, peripheral nerve injuries are often associated with excruciating pain that has a devastating impact on the quality of life; nerve repair often provides its complete resolution or a remarkable subsidence in the intensity of neuropathic pain or dramatically reduces its severity.
Unfortunately, in developing countries where access to healthcare is not guaranteed by the government, the majority of these patients usually do not receive any treatment as they cannot sustain the elevated costs related to surgery and physiotherapy. Another reason that explains why many patients are conservatively managed, even when they have a definite indication for surgery, is the lack of surgeons specialized in nerve micro-reconstruction.
The above described scenario explains well why peripheral nerve surgery is in high demand in many areas of the world and why neurosurgeons in developing countries in particular should have at least a groundwork training in peripheral nerve surgery, enabling them to correctly assess these patients and provide basic treatment.
In order to better understand the present scenario related to peripheral nerve surgery, it must be brought to attention that until the end of the seventies, nerve repair was burdened by unsuccessful outcome in a high percentage of cases and this resulted in therapeutic nihilism in the medical community. In spite of the recent introduction of newer technology and innovative surgical techniques that have changed the dismal scenario of peripheral nerve surgery that many physicians had perceived in the past, pockets of surgeons still unfortunately remain in the medical community who distrust the surgical procedures and still believe in a dismal outcome related to this sugical field. This is often related to a lack of knowledge of the remarkable progress achieved in the last years in this field.
In such contest, “ Recent advances in nerve repair” by Sudheeesh Ramachandran and Rajiv Midha, certainly represents a vital source of informative reading on the topic as it offers a comprehensive and exhaustive illustration of the state-of-the-art issues related to peripheral nerve surgery; it describes not only the wide spectrum of technical options that are nowadays available but also succeeds in providing a historical overview of the evolution and development of surgery for nerve repair. The article offers a very accurate insight on the diverse surgical strategies applied in nerve repair but especially focuses on nerve transfers, illustrating in details, the indications and surgical techniques; thus, it endorses the central role that these procedures now occupy in peripheral nerve surgery.
Algimantas Narakas and Hanno Millesi deserve the credit to be the pioneers of peripheral nerve surgery in the 70's, reviving the interest for a surgical subspecialty that had been condemned to oblivion, it is unquestionable that the revolution in peripheral nerve surgery was inititated in the early 90's thanks to the French Orthopedic surgeon, Christophe Oberlin. Nerve transfers had already been introduced and applied in brachial plexus surgery (e.g., spinal accessory to suprascapular transfer, intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer, etc.) since long, yet his technique to reinnervate the biceps in C5-C6 avulsion injuries introduced a completely innovative approach. It encompassed the possibility of harvesting only a few selected fascicles from the donor nerve, thus avoiding the need to sacrifice it in order to regain a function that is considered to be of higher priority. Oberlin's nerve transfer thus ushered in a new era in brachial plexus surgery, characterized by the continuous flourishing of newer surgical techniques.,,,,,, Distal neurotizations have offered not only the opportunity to restore function in cases associated with avulsions, but also to obtain better functional results in a shorter time and in a higher percentage of cases in comparison with nerve graft repair. These procedures have also offered the possibility of restoring a good function even when the surgery was delayed, whereas it is very well known that graft repair usually presents unfavorable outcome after more than one year has elapsed following the trauma. Nowadays, in brachial plexus surgery, nerve transfers have largely replaced graft microreconstruction and have become the techniques of first choice, even when the conditions to perfom the latter are present. Some surgeons have also started to successfully apply them in single nerve injuries distal to the brachial plexus.,,, It is well known that graft repair of high upper extremity nerve injuries (e.g., proximal lesions of the ulnar or the median nerve) usually results in a poor functional outcome and nerve transfers have proven to be viable options to restore a valid hand function and critical sensations in such cases.
In more recent years, the newer frontier for nerve transfers has been initiated mainly in the quadriplegic patients.,,, Spinal cord injuries are devastating and are also associated with remarkable financial impact on the community. The application of nerve transfers to spinal cord injuries is still largely in the experimental stage; nevertheless, attempts to restore hand function in tetraplegic patients seem promising as they succeed in restoring some autonomy for the patients. This has resulted in a remarkable improvement in the quality of life of these patients, previously condemned to be completely dependent on their caregivers.
However, the wave of enthusiasm ushered in by the favorable outcome obtained as a result of the nerve transfer procedures should not make us forget that these techniques are not completely flawless. Although statistically low, the possibility that the procedure might be unsuccessful must be considered; the occasional occurrence of complications in the territory of the donor nerve must also be considered. For instance, Oberlin's double transfer does entail the risk of a functional deficit in the hand, a potential complication that should not downplayed. After the successful carrying out of the nerve transfers, the resulting function is not completely independent from the one controlled by the donor nerve; after the ulnar-to-musculocutaneous nerve bypass, the recovery of the biceps muscle is often associated with a tendency to flex the finger in order to bring about elbow flexion, and not all patients learn to separate the two movements. Another potential issue that needs to be taken into consideration with nerve transfers is the degree of pre-existing injury to the donor nerve. A valid functional outcome cannot be guaranteed if the donor nerve had been previoulsy damaged and this usually explains the variations in the surgical results.
The importance of such issues should not be downplayed especially while considering such procedures in quadriplegic patients. The expandable nerve for a nerve transfer is often responsible of the innervation of a muscle that can be a potential donor in a tendon/muscle transfer; the latter are known to have been successfully tested in such cases for a long time and present the advantage of restoring some hand function in these patients without risking any failure and in a much shorter time in comparison with nerve transfers.,,,,
The above mentioned considerations clearly highlight that, although characterized by an extremely favorable outcome, nerve transfers are associated with potential risks that should be carefully weighed in each individual case; thus, a wide spectrum of individualized options must be always kept in mind in order to provide the most appropriate surgical treatment for each patient.
Finally, we should consider that peripheral nerve surgery is currently in a golden age in comparison with the conditions in the past. Nowadays, we focus not only on mere survival but also on the quality of life of our patients; we strive to provide them the opportunity to not only overcome their traumatic event but also fully regain their previous lifestyle.
|1||Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad Vannemreddy SSV, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 1998;45:116-22.|
|2||Wilcke O, Sanker P. Peripheral nerve lesions in multiple injuries. Neurosurg Rev 1989;12:55-58.|
|3||Selecki BR, Ring IT, Simpson DA, Vanderfield GK, Sewell MF. Trauma to the central and peripheral nervous systems: Part II. A statistical profile of surgical treatment in New South Wales 1977. Aust N Z J Surg 1982;52:111-16.|
|4||Taylor CA, Braza D, Rice JB, Dillingham T. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in extremity trauma. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2008;87;381-5.|
|5||Ramachandran S, Midha R. Recent advances in nerve repair. Neurol India 2019;67:S106-14.|
|6||Oberlin C, Béal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJ. Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: Anatomical study and report of four cases. J Hand Surg Am 1994;19:232-7.|
|7||Witoonchart K, Leechavengvongs S, Uerpairojkit C, Thuvasethakul P, Wongnopsuwan V. Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part I: An anatomic feasibility study. J Hand Surg Am 2003;28:628-32.|
|8||Leechavengvongs S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Thuvasethakul P. Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part II: A report of 7 cases. J Hand Surg Am 2003;28:633-8.|
|9||Flores LP Outcomes of transferring a healthy motor fascicle from the radial nerve to a branch for the triceps to recover elbow extension in partial brachial plexus palsy. Neurosurgery 2017;80:448-53.|
|10||Ferraresi S, Garozzo D, Buffatti P. Reinnervation of the biceps in C5-7 brachial plexus avulsion injuries: Results after distal bypass surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2004;16:E6.|
|11||Ferraresi S, Garozzo D, Basso E, Maistrello L, Lucchin F, Di Pasquale P. The medial cord to musculocutaneous (MCMc) nerve transfer: A new method to reanimate elbow flexion after C5-C6-C7-(C8) avulsive injuries of the brachial plexus--technique and results. Neurosurg Rev 2014;37:321-9.|
|12||Bertelli JA, Santos MA, Kechele PR, Ghizoni MF, Duarte H. Triceps motor nerve branches as a donor or receiver in nerve transfers. Neurosurgery 2007;61(5 Suppl 2):333-9.|
|13||Palazzi S, Palazzi JL, Caceres JP Neurotization with the brachialis muscle motor nerve. Microsurgery 2006;26:330-3.|
|14||Wang Y, Zhu S Transfer of a branch of the anterior interosseus nerve to the motor branch of the median nerve and ulnar nerve. Chin Med J (Engl) 1997;110:216-9.|
|15||Brown JM, Yee A, Mackinnon SE. Distal median to ulnar nerve transfers to restore ulnar motor and sensory function within the hand: Technical nuances. Neurosurgery 2009;65:966-78.|
|16||Brown JM, Tung TH, Mackinnon SE Median to radial nerve transfer to restore wrist and finger extension: Technical nuances. Neurosurgery 2010;66(3 Suppl Operative):75-83.|
|17||Moore AM, Franco M, Tung TH. Motor and sensory nerve transfers in the forearm and hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:721-30.|
|18||Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Winkelmann Duarte EC, Ghizoni MF, Duarte H. Transfer of axillary nerve branches to reconstruct elbow extension in tetraplegics: A laboratory investigation of surgical feasibility. Microsurgery 2011;31:376-81.|
|19||Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Nerve and free gracilis muscle transfers for thumb and finger extension reconstruction in long-standing tetraplegia. Hand Surg Am 2016;41:e411-e416.|
|20||Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Nerve transfers for elbow and finger extension reconstruction in midcervical spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg 2015;122:121-7.|
|21||Fox IK. Nerve Transfers in Tetraplegia. Hand Clin 2016;32:227-42. |
|22||Hems T. Nerve transfers for traumatic brachial plexus injury: Advantages and problems. J Hand Microsurg 2011;3:6-10.|
|23||Liverneaux PA, Diaz LC, Beaulieu JY, Durand S, Oberlin C. Preliminary results of double nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in upper type brachial plexus palsies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:915-9.|
|24||House JH, Gwathmey FW, Lundsgaard DK. Restoration of strong grasp and lateral pinch in tetraplegia due to cervical spinal cord injury. J Hand Surg Am 1976;1:152-9.|
|25||Fridén J, Reinholdt C, Turcsányii I, Gohritz A. A single-stage operation for reconstruction of hand flexion, extension, and intrinsic function in tetraplegia: The alphabet procedure. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2011;15:230-5.|
|26||Lee SK, Wisser JR. Restoration of pinch in intrinsic muscles of the hand. Hand Clin 2012;28:45-51.|
|27||Edery N, Revol M, Geffrier A, Rem K, Kerfant N, Cristofari S. Evolution of surgical indications in upper limb functional surgery for tetraplegic patients: Retrospective study of 428 procedures. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas. 2018.11.001.|