Neurol India Close
 

Figure 1: (a) The time course of NF-L alternations in the cerebrum following EAE. Representative immunoblots of NF-L are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± SD. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (* P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). ( b) The time course of NF-L alternations in the spinal cord following EAE. Representative immunoblots of NF-L are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± SD. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (* P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)

Figure 1: (a) The time course of NF-L alternations in the cerebrum following EAE. Representative immunoblots of NF-L are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± SD. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (<i>* P</i> < 0.05, <i>**P</i> < 0.01). <b>(</b> b) The time course of NF-L alternations in the spinal cord following EAE. Representative immunoblots of NF-L are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± SD. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (<i>* P</i> < 0.05, <i>**P</i> < 0.01)