Neurol India Close
 

Figure 3: (a) The time course of NF-H alternations in the cerebrum following CO. Representative immunoblots of NF-H are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± SD. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (* P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). ( b) The time course of NF-H alternations in the spinal cord following CO. Representative immunoblots of NF-H are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± S.D. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (* P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)

Figure 3: (a) The time course of NF-H alternations in the cerebrum following CO. Representative immunoblots of NF-H are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± SD. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (<i>* P</i> < 0.05, <i>**P <</i> 0.01). <b>(</b> b) The time course of NF-H alternations in the spinal cord following CO. Representative immunoblots of NF-H are also shown below the graph. The 0-day control is presented with 100%, the one of the treated groups is described with the percentage of 0-day control. The results are presented as a mean percentage of 0-day control ± S.D. Statistical significance is determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The asterisk indicates statistical difference (<i>* P</i> < 0.05, <i>**P <</i> 0.01)