Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 3546  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
  » Next article
  » Previous article 
  » Table of Contents
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (543 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 »  Results
 »  Discussion
 »  Acknowledgements
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded267    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 26    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2010  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 727-731

Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction using protein b primers for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis

1 Department of Medical Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
3 Department of Neurology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Acceptance08-Jul-2010
Date of Web Publication28-Oct-2010

Correspondence Address:
Kusum Sharma
Department of Medical Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: DST (Chandigarh), Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.72189

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Background: Rapid and specific diagnosis of tubercular meningitis (TBM) is of utmost importance. Aim: To evaluate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using protein b primers directed against M. tuberculosis for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Materials and Methods: PCR using protein b primers was performed in ten patients with confirmed TBM (culture positive), 60 patients with clinically suspected TBM and 40 patients with no TBM (control group). Results: Protein b PCR had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100% in patients with confirmed TBM. In 60 clinically diagnosed TBM patients, protein b PCR was positive in 49 (81.7%) patients. The overall sensitivity of microscopy, culture and PCR using protein b primers was 1.4%, 14.3%, and 82.8% and specificity was 100%, 100%, and 100% respectively. Conclusion: Protein b PCR is valuable in rapid diagnosis of TBM.

Keywords: Diagnosis, PCR, tubercular meningitis

How to cite this article:
Sharma K, Sharma A, Singh M, Ray P, Dandora R, Sharma SK, Modi M, Prabhakar S, Sharma M. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction using protein b primers for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Neurol India 2010;58:727-31

How to cite this URL:
Sharma K, Sharma A, Singh M, Ray P, Dandora R, Sharma SK, Modi M, Prabhakar S, Sharma M. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction using protein b primers for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Neurol India [serial online] 2010 [cited 2022 Nov 30];58:727-31. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2010/58/5/727/72189

 » Introduction Top

Diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is often presumptive, and is based on clinical features, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, imaging (computerized tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) findings and response to anti-tuberculous drug therapy. [1] Conventional methods like microscopy and culture, although considered as gold standards, are quite inadequate. Acid fast staining requires a large number of bacilli (> 10 4 cells/ml) and culture requires 6-8 weeks, which is often negative due to small number of bacilli in CSF. [2],[3] The newer tests like radiometric BACTEC system, serological tests and IFN-γ being evaluated these days are not cost effective.[4],[5]

The development of a rapid, sensitive and specific test for detection of mycobacterium has been a long standing need. Nucleic acid amplification techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been reported to be more sensitive and specific as these techniques attempt to detect specific DNA sequence from the organism under investigation. Several Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific DNA sequences like MPB64, 65kDa antigen and IS6110 have been evaluated. [6] The reported sensitivity and specificity varies between 50% and 91% and 60% and 100% respectively. [7] The repetitive nature of IS6110 insertion sequence in M. tuberculosis makes it an attractive target for PCR amplification and several studies have evaluated IS6110 for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. [8] However either absence, or presence of a few copies of this sequence have already been reported in some isolates. [9],[10],[11],[12] Study from India has also reported that a large number of clinical isolates (40%) had either a single copy or no copy of insertion sequence. [13] Another nucleotide sequence (419 bp) of protein antigen b (Pab) gene of molecular weight 38 kda (total gene size of 1993 bp), specific for M. tuberculosis has been shown to be a useful target for detection in a few studies. [14],[15],[16] This protein b gene has not been properly evaluated in patients with tuberculous meningitis in this region of the world. In the present study we report our experience with protein b based PCR assay in the CSF of patients with TBM and non-TBM and the comparison with conventional techniques like microscopy and culture.

 » Materials and Methods Top

Between September 2008 and April 2009, 110 CSF samples were received in the laboratory of Medical Microbiology department, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India for acid fast staining and culture. Patients' age ranged between 1 and 90 years. The relevant history and other details of the patients were noted from the case records. The patients were into 3 groups: Group I: TBM (n=70): (a) Confirmed TBM-culture/smear positive (n=10), and (b) suspected TBM: smear/ culture negative, clinical and laboratory features suggestive of TBM and response to anti-tuberculosis therapy [17] (n=60); Group II: Non-TBM infectious meningitis (n=20): (a) pyogenic meningitis (n=9), (b) viral meningitis (n=10), and (c) fungal meningitis (n=1); Group III: Non infectious neurological disorder group (n=20): Guillain Barre' syndrome (n=5), brain tumors (n=10), and multiple sclerosis (n=5). This study is a part of DST sponsored project approved by the institute ethics committee.

Processing of CSF sample

All the 110 CSF samples were subjected to three microbiological tests: Ziehl-Neelsen staining (ZN), culture on Lowenstein-Jensen medium and PCR with protein b. The CSF samples of the subjects were processed in a biosafety cabinet placed in a specially assigned room. Abour 200-300μl of specimens was aliquot and stored at -20°C. PCR was done for only those specimens which were used for smear and culture examination for M. tuberculosis. Using 200μl of centrifuge deposit for PCR, the rest of the deposit was used for acid fast microscopy by Ziehl-Neelsen method and culture was performed on 2 slopes of Lowenstein-Jensen medium. PCR was standardized and was found to have quantitative sensitivity to detect the DNA equivalent to 2-3 organisms. It tested positive with standard strain of M. tuberculosis, H 37 RV.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted according to the CTAB-phenol-chloroform extraction method. Briefly 0.2 ml of CSF was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and pellet was suspended in 500 μl of TE Buffer (Tris -EDTA,) 30 μl 10% SDS and 3μl proteinase k (20 mg/ml), mixed and incubated at 37°C for 1 hr. After incubation, 100 μl of 5M NaCl and 80μl of high salt CTAB (cetyle- trimethyl ammonium bromide) were added and mixed followed by incubation at 65°C for 10 min. An approximate equal volume (0.7-0.8 μl) of chloroform-isoamyle alcohol (24:1) were added, mixed thoroughly and centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm.

The aqueous viscous supernatant was carefully decanted and transferred to a new tube. An equal volume of phenol: chloroform- isoamylalcohol (25:24:1) was added followed by a 5 min spin at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was separated and then mixed with 0.6 volume of isopropanol to get a precipitate. The precipitated nucleic acids were washed with 75% ethanol, dried and re-suspended in 100μl of TE buffer.

Polymerase chain reaction

In each independent PCR assay, test results were compared with the results for one positive and one negative control. The positive control included the DNA of H 37 Rv and negative control included the PCR grade water. Identification of M. tuberculosis was done using a specific pair of primers designed to amplify protein b antigen in the M. tuberculosis complex and the expected band size was about 419bp. The sequence of primers used Pab f and Pab r were: 5'-ACC ACC GAG CGG TTC GCC TGA-3' and 5'-GAT CTG CGG GTC GTC CCA GGT-3' respectively.

A 25 μl reaction contained 10x assay buffer (Banglore Genei, Banglore, India), 10 mM dNTPs (Banglore Genei), 10pmole of each primers, 2.5 units Taq DNA Polymerase (Banglore Genei, Banglore, India) and 5μl of extracted DNA. Amplification was carried in a thermal cycler, which involved 35 cycles including denaturation at 95°C for 4 min, annealing of primers at 63°C for 1 min. and primer extension at 72°C for one min. the amplification product were separated on 1.5% agarose gel. The samples showing the presence of 419bp band under ultraviolet transilumination were considered positive.

Statistical methods

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were calculated using the standard formulae.

 » Results Top

Of the 110 CSF samples studied, ten were samples form patients with confirmed TBM, 60 were from patients with clinically suspected TBM, 20 were from patients with non-TBM infections, and 20 were from patients with non-infectious neurological diseases. [Figure 1] shows the 419bp amplification product of protein b gene of M. tuberculosis by PCR.
Figure 1: PCR amplification of 419bp of protein b gene of M. tuberculosis on 1.5% agarose gel. Lane 1: 100bp DNA marker, lane 2: Positive control, lane 3,4,5: Positive CSF samples and lane 5: Negative control

Click here to view

Only one sample was positive for acid fast bacilli (AFB) by microscopy, the sample was also positive by culture and PCR. Of the ten confirmed TBM with positive CSF culture, nine were positive by PCR with protein b. In suspected TBM group of the 60 patients, PCR was positive in 49 patients [Table 1] and all 49 patients had good response to anti-tuberculous drug therapy. The response to treatment was judged by the experienced neurologists in treating TBM. In control group all 40 patiens showed negative result in all the three tests, thus giving 100 percent specificity for all the tests used.
Table 1: Results of AFB smear/culture and Protein b PCR

Click here to view

A final diagnosis of TBM was made in 70 patients, based on results of culture, microscopy, PCR and response to anti tuberculous drug therapy [Table 2]. Of these 70 patiets, PCR was positive in 58, culture in 10, and microscopy in one. Thus the sensitivity of PCR with protein b , culture and microscopy was 82.8%, 14.3% and 1.4% respectively. However the sensitivity of PCR in the confirmed TBM and suspected TBM group was 90% and 81.7% respectively. In non TBM group PCR was negative in all cases. Hence, the specificity was 100%.
Table 2: Sensitivity and specificity of PCR test compared to culture /AFB smear

Click here to view

 » Discussion Top

TBM is a common clinical condition which requires early and prompt treatment to prevent neurological complications. [18] Among the various methods studied, PCR is considered to be most sensitive and specific diagnostic method especially in cases where suspicion is high but AFB staining is negative. [19]

The majority of PCR based studies have used IS6110 as target. [20],[21] The reason for using IS6110 is the presence of multiple copies in M. tuberculosis genome, which was thought to confer higher sensitivity. [22] It has however been shown that there are M.tuberculosis strains originating from India which do not contain IS6110. [22] It is believed that more studies are required to establish its utility in the diagnosis of TBM. [23] Therefore, in this study we have evaluated protein b gene PCR for diagnosis of large number of patients of TBM and non-TBM and also compared the results of PCR with conventional methods like microscopy and culture.

In our study, the protein b PCR detected the presence of M.tuberculosis DNA in 90% of patients with confirmed TBM and 81.7% patients with clinically suspected TBM. Our results are similar to some previous studies which showed 85-98% sensitivity [18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25] and differs from other studies, which had a low sensitivity of 32-75%. [26],[27],[28],[29] The reason for the low sensitivity in many studies could be due to low volume of CSF available, insufficient lyses of cells, loss of DNA during purification or different target used for amplification. [29] In our study, there was one patient who was culture positive but PCR negative and there were 11 clinically suspected patients who were also PCR negative. All these 11 patients responded to antitubercular therapy. The various reasons for PCR negativity in the culture positive case and the clinically suspected cases which responded to anti tuberculous drug therapy could be small volume of CSF received in the microbiology laboratory, low number of bacteria in the CSF, poor lyses of bacteria in the CSF samples or the presence of some PCR inhibitors like bacterial contaminants, phenol etc in the CSF samples. Similar factors have also been reported to be responsible for PCR negativity in culture confirmed as well as clinically suspected cases of TBM in other studies. [28],[29] Sometimes the tough cell wall of M. tubecculosis makes the isolation of target DNA difficult. [29]

For the detection of overall TBM cases, the protein b PCR was useful in terms of sensitivity (82.8%) and specificity (100%) as compared to culture results showing 14.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity [Table 2]. Protein b PCR is a good rapid method for diagnosis in clinically suspected TBM cases, particularly where AFB staining and culture are negative. Some other studies have also shown that CSF PCR is more sensitive in cases of clinically suspected TBM that responded to empirical treatment. In our study of 81% clinically suspected patients who were positive for protein b PCR, had shown good response to anti tuberculou drug therapy. Protein b PCR was positive in 90% of confirmed TBM cases. The limitation of this study is that there is no diagnostic test which can serve as a 'gold standard'. While the culture has low sensitivity, clinical assessment may be subjective. Commercially available kits in India such as MTD Gen Probe and Roche Amplicor, which are PCR based tests have shown to give low sensitivities of 33% and 60% respectively in patients with TBM. [30],[31] As the sensitivity of protein b in detecting TBM was 82.8% in our study, there would be cases of TBM in endemic country like India, which would be missed by protein b and hence further studies with multiplex PCR using IS6110 and protein b should be done to look whether their combined use increases the sensitivity of the diagnosis of TBM.

We have evaluated this protein b primer for the first time in large number of TBM and non-TBM CSF samples. A number of other studies have used IS611O as target for amplification, but this IS611O may be missing in our population as mentioned above. The sensitivity and specificity in the present study was much higher than earlier studies and suggest the utility of protein b PCR as an important tool to guide a clinician in the diagnosis, where conventional methods fail.

According to our study, protein b PCR could make a considerable impact in the diagnosis of TBM, which is often missed by conventional tests producing negative results or cause an unacceptable delay in diagnosis. This is especially true in TBM cases in which early diagnosis is essential for better outcome of the disease. In conclusion, protein b PCR can play potentially important role in strengthening the diagnosis of TBM.

 » Acknowledgements Top

The study is a part of the research project funded by DST (Chandigarh).

 » References Top

1.Hosoglu S, Ayaz C, Geylk MF, Kokoglu OF, Cerviz A. Tuberculosis meningitis in adults: An eleven year review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:553-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Tiwari V, Jain A, Verma RK. Application of enzyme amplified mycobacterial DNA detection in the diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2003;118:224-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Clarridge JE, Shawar RM, Shinnick TM, Plikaytis BB. Large scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1993;3:2049-56.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Kolk AH, Schuitema AR, Kuijper S, Van Leeuwen J, Harmans PW, Van Embden JD, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by using PCR and a non-reactive detection system. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2567-75.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Pao CC, Yen TS, You JB, Maa JS, Fiss EH, Chang CH. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1877-90.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Dwivedi A, Sarin BC, Mittar D, Sehajpal PK. Optimization of 38kDa based PCR assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical samples. Indian J Tuberc 2003;50:209-17.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Dale JW, Tang TH, Wall S, Zainuddin ZF, Plikaytis B. Conservation of IS6110 sequence in strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single and multiple copies. Tuber Lung Dis 1997;78:225-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Narayanan S, Parandaman V, Narayanan PR, Venkatesan P, Girish C, Mahadevan S, et al. Evaluation of PCR using TRC4 and IS6110 primers in detection of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2006-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Singh UB, Bhanu NV, Suresh VN, Arora J, Rana T, Seth P. Utility of polymerase chain reaction in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis from samples of bone marrow aspirate. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006;75:960-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Agasino CB, Ponce de Leon A, Jasmer RM, Small PM. Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in San Francisco that do not contains IS6110. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:518-20.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Rajavelu P, Das SD. Cell mediated immune response of healthy laboratory volunteers to sonicate antigens prepared from the most prevalent strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from South India harboring a single copy of IS6110. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10:1149-52.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Fomukong NG, Tang TH, al-Maamary S, Ibrahim WA, Ramayah S, Yates M, et al. Insertion sequence typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Characterization on a wide spread sub type with single copy of IS6110. Tuber Lung Dis 1994;75:435-40.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Das S, Paramasivan CN, Lowrie DB, Prabhakar R, Narayaan PR. IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients with pulmonary TB in Madras, South India. Tuber Lung Dis 1995;76:550-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Miyazaki Y, Koga H, Kohnos S, Kaku M. Nested PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2228-32.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Sjobring U, Mecklenburg M, Andersen AB, Miorner H. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2200-4.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Andersen AB, Hansen EB. Structure and mapping of antigenic domains of protein antigen b, a 38,000-molecular weight protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 1989;57:2481-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Deshpande PS, Kashyap RS, Ramtake SS, Nagdev KJ, Purohit HJ, Taori GM, et al. Evaluation of IS6110 PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2007;4:10.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Kennedy DH, Fallon RJ. Tuberculous meningitis. JAMA 1979;241:264-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Bhattacharya B, Karak K, Ghosal AG, Roy A, Das S, Dandapat P,et al. Development of a new sensitive and efficient multiplex polymerase reaction for identification and differentiation of different mycobacterial species. Trop Med Int Health 2003;8:150-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Caws M, Wilson SM, Clough C, Drobniewski F. Role of IS6110-targeted PCR, culture, biochemical, clinical and immunological criteria for diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3150-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Van Soolingen D, Herman PW, de Haas PE, Soll DR, Van Embden JD. Occurrence and stability of insertion sequence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2578-89.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Rafi W, Venkataswamy MM, Nagarthana S, Satishchandra P, Chandramukhi A. Role of an IS6110 uniplex PCR in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: Experience at a tertiary neurocentre. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;11:209-14.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Seth P, Ahuja GK, Bhanu NV, Behari M, Bhowmik S, Broor S, et al. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of clinically suspected tuberculous meningitis. Tuber Lung Dis 1996;77:353-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Rafi A, Naghily B. Efficiency of polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2003;32:357-60.  Back to cited text no. 24
25.Nguyen LN, Kox LF, Pham LD, Kuijper S, Kolk AH. The potential contribution of the polymerase chain reaction to the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Arch Neurol 1996;53:771-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
26.Ahuja GK, Mohan KK, Prasad K, Behari M. Diagnostic criteria for tuberculous meningitis and their validation. Tuber Lung Dis 1996;75:149-52.  Back to cited text no. 26
27.Donald PR, Victor TC, Jordaan AM, Schoeman JF, Van Heldon PD. Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Scand J Infect Dis 1993;25:613-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
28.Sumi MG, Mathai A, Reuben S, Sarda C, Radhakrishanan W. A comparative evaluation of DOT immunobinding assay (Dot-lba) and polymerase chain reaction for the laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis. Diagn Microbial Infect Dis 2003;35:372-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
29.Noordohek GT, Kolk AH, Bjune G, Catty D, Dale JW, Fine PE,et al. Senstivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A blind comparison study among laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:277-84.  Back to cited text no. 29
30.Bonington A, Strang JI, Klapper PE, Hood SV, Rubombora AW, Willers R, et al. Use of roche amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR in early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1251-4.  Back to cited text no. 30
31.Lang AM, Feris Iglesias J, Pena C, Sanchez JF, Stockman L, Rys P, et al. Clinical evaluation of the gen probe amplified direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms in cerebrospinal fluids. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:2191-4.  Back to cited text no. 31


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Advances in tuberculous meningitis diagnosis
Sonia Ahlawat, Renu Chaudhary, Mehak Dangi, Kiran Bala, Machiavelli Singh, Anil Kumar Chhillar
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2020; 20(12): 1229
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Comparative evaluation of IS6110 and protein antigen b PCR in cerebrospinal fluid for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in children
Sikha Agarwal, Arushi Gahlot Saini, Sumeet Dhawan, Alka Khadwal, Kusum Sharma, Pratibha Singhi
Journal of Medical Microbiology . 2020; 69(7): 979
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Tuberculous Meningitis
Ali Pormohammad, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Timothy D. McHugh, Seyed Mohammad Riahi, Nathan C. Bahr, Colleen Suzanne Kraft
Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2019; 57(6)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Microbiological diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: Phenotype to genotype
RavindraKumar Garg
Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2019; 150(5): 448
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction in space-occupying lesions of liver reported as granulomatous inflammation/tuberculosis on fine-needle aspiration cytology
Kusum Sharma, Nalini Gupta, Kapil Goyal, Ajay Kumar Duseja, Aman Sharma, Arvind Rajwanshi
CytoJournal. 2017; 14: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Real-time PCR followed by high-resolution melting curve analysis: A rapid and pragmatic approach for screening of multidrug-resistant extrapulmonary tuberculosis
Kusum Sharma,Megha Sharma,Shreya Singh,Manish Modi,Aman Sharma,Pallab Ray,Subhash Varma
Tuberculosis. 2017; 106: 56
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Multiplex PCR as a novel method in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis–a pilot study
Kusum Sharma,Rajesh Kumar Meena,Ashish Aggarwal,Rajesh Chhabra
Acta Neurochirurgica. 2017; 159(3): 503
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 rpoB gene high-resolution melt curve analysis: a rapid approach for diagnosis and screening of drug resistance in tuberculous meningitis
Kusum Sharma,Manish Modi,Harsimran Kaur,Aman Sharma,Pallab Ray,Subhash Varma
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2015; 83(2): 144
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Commercial nucleic acid amplification tests in tuberculous meningitis - a meta-analysis
Regan S. Solomons,Sabine L. van Elsland,Douwe H. Visser,Kim G.P. Hoek,Ben J. Marais,Johan F. Schoeman,Anne M. van Furth
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Detection of Delta-like 1 ligand for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: An effective and rapid diagnostic method
Tao Peng,Yan Zhou,Jinyi Li,Jinghong Li,Wencui Wan,Yanjie Jia
Journal of International Medical Research. 2014; 42(3): 728
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Novel multi-targeted polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of presumed tubercular uveitis
Kusum Sharma,Vishali Gupta,Reema Bansal,Aman Sharma,Meera Sharma,Amod Gupta
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection. 2013; 3(1): 25
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Diagnosing tuberculous meningitis - have we made any progress?
Jennifer Ho,Ben J. Marais,Gwendolyn L. Gilbert,Anna P. Ralph
Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2013; 18(6): 783
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Mycobacterium AviumMeningitis in HIV Patients in North India
Kusum Sharma,Aman Sharma,Suma Appannanavar,Manish Modi,Sudesh Prabhakar,Meera Sharma,Subhash Varma
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 2013; 29(6): 849
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Diagnosis of tuberculosis infection based on synthetic peptides from Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85 complex
Rajpal S. Kashyap,Seema D. Shekhawat,Amit R. Nayak,Hemant J. Purohit,Girdhar M. Taori,Hatim F. Daginawala
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2013; 115(6): 678
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Molecular diagnosis of psoas abscess secondary to Pottæs spine
Abhishek Mewara,Kusum Sharma,M.S. Dhillon,Meera Sharma
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 2013; 35(11): 92
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Molecular diagnosis of psoas abscess secondary to Pottæs spine
Mewara, A. and Sharma, K. and Dhillon, M.S. and Sharma, M.
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 2013; 35(11): 92-93
17 Diagnosing tuberculous meningitis - have we made any progress?
Ho, J. and Marais, B.J. and Gilbert, G.L. and Ralph, A.P.
Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2013; 18(6): 783-793
18 Mycobacterium avium meningitis in HIV patients in North India
Sharma, K. and Sharma, A. and Appannanavar, S. and Modi, M. and Prabhakar, S. and Sharma, M. and Varma, S.
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 2013; 29(6): 849-850
19 Diagnosis of tuberculosis infection based on synthetic peptides from Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85 complex
Kashyap, R.S. and Shekhawat, S.D. and Nayak, A.R. and Purohit, H.J. and Taori, G.M. and Daginawala, H.F.
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2013; 115(6): 678-683
20 Multiplex PCR for rapid diagnosis of gastrointestinal tuberculosis
Sharma, K. and Sinha, S.K. and Sharma, A. and Nada, R. and Prasad, K.K. and Goyal, K. and Rana, S.S. and Bhasin, D.K. and Sharma, M.
Journal of Global Infectious Diseases. 2013; 5(2): 49-53
21 Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by PCR
Mehta, P.K. and Raj, A. and Singh, N. and Khuller, G.K.
FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2012; 66(1): 20-36
22 Does multiplex polymerase chain reaction increase the diagnostic percentage in osteoarticular tuberculosis? A prospective evaluation of 80 cases
Sharma, K. and Sharma, A. and Sharma, S.K. and Sen, R.K. and Dhillon, M.S. and Sharma, M.
International Orthopaedics. 2012; 36(2): 255-259
23 Does multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction increase the diagnostic percentage in osteoarticular tuberculosis? A prospective evaluation of 80 cases
Kusum Sharma,Aman Sharma,Shiv Kumar Sharma,Ramesh Kumar Sen,Mandeep Singh Dhillon,Meera Sharma
International Orthopaedics. 2012; 36(2): 255
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by PCR
Promod K. Mehta,Ankush Raj,Netrapal Singh,Gopal K. Khuller
FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. 2012; 66(1): 20
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Multiplex PCR for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
Sharma Kusum,Sharma Aman,Ray Pallab,Sharma Shiv Kumar,Modi Manish,Prabhakar Sudesh,Varma Subhash,Sharma Meera
Journal of Neurology. 2011; 258(10): 1781
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Multiplex PCR for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
Kusum, S., Aman, S., Pallab, R., Kumar, S.S., Manish, M., Sudesh, P., Subhash, V., Meera, S.
Journal of Neurology. 2011; 258(10): 1781-1787


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow