| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||14168 |
| Printed||178 |
| Emailed||3 |
| PDF Downloaded||269 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||5 |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 137-143
Management of adult tethered cord syndrome: Our experience and review of literature
Kanwaljeet Garg1, Vivek Tandon1, Rajinder Kumar1, Bhawani Shankar Sharma1, Ashok Kumar Mahapatra2
1 Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India
|Date of Submission||09-Oct-2013|
|Date of Decision||26-Nov-2013|
|Date of Acceptance||31-Mar-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||14-May-2014|
R. No 720, 7th Floor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is a complex clinicopathologic entity, mostly described in children with limited number of studies describing in adults. This unique and rare subgroup of patients presents with characteristic features of TCS, but unlike children, pain is a predominant clinical symptom. Materials and Methods: Case records of 24 patients aged ≥16 years who had undergone surgery with a diagnosis of TCS between 2001 and 2011 were reviewed. Patients who have underwent surgery earlier for tethered cord or for diastematomyelia/spinal dysraphism and patients who had radiological evidence of tethering elements like lipoma of the cord on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were excluded from the study. Results: Low backache was the most common presenting symptom. At the time of final follow-up, 15 (83.3%) patients had shown improvement in backache. Weakness improved by at least one grade in seven (77.8%) patients. Bladder symptoms improved in six (50%) patients. Conclusion: In case of symptomatic patient with low-lying cord, detethering is an advisable option.
Keywords: Adult, detethering, occult spinal dysraphism, tethered cord
|How to cite this article:|
Garg K, Tandon V, Kumar R, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK. Management of adult tethered cord syndrome: Our experience and review of literature. Neurol India 2014;62:137-43
| » Introduction|| |
Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is a complex clinicopathologic entity that is associated with varied but consistent symptomatology. ,, It was first described by Hoffman et al., in 1976  and is due to relative failure of spinal cord ascent within the vertebral column during embryogenesis resulting in a "low-lying" conus medullaris.  Mechanical causes, as seen in radiology, known to be associated with tethered cord are thickened or lipomatous filum terminale, lipomas, epidermoid tumors, myelomeningocoeles, lipomyelomeningocoeles, and scar lesions that lack viscoelasticity and result in the fixation of the spinal cord.  It is postulated that TCS subsequently results from stretch-induced ischemia, depressed electrophysiological activity, and impairment of oxidative metabolism. ,
Most literature described this entity in children, with limited number of studies describing adult TCS. , The true incidence of adult TCS is largely unknown. This unique and rare subgroup of patients presents with characteristic features of TCS, but unlike children, pain is a predominant clinical symptom. Timely surgical intervention can prevent further deterioration and may even improve existing symptoms. In this background, we analyzed 24 consecutive patients aged ≥16 years, operated for tethered cord, and present our recommendations for treatment of such rare cases, based on our experience and review of literature.
| » Materials and Methods|| |
The medical records of patients aged ≥16 years undergoing surgery with a diagnosis of TCS between 2001 and 2011, were retrospectively evaluated. Only patients (age ≥16 years) with thick/normal filum and conus level being below the L 1 -L 2 disk were included in the study. Filum was considered to be thick, if the diameter was more than 2 mm, at L 5 -S 1 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients who have underwent surgery earlier for tethered cord or for diastematomyelia/spinal dysraphism were excluded from the study. Similarly, patients who had radiological evidence of tethering elements like lipoma of the cord, dermoid, epidermoid, neurenteric cyst, and type I or II split cords were excluded from the study. All these patients underwent surgical detethering of the spinal cord as previously described in literatureexcept one patient where she was diagnosed to be having Chiari malformation More Details with syrinx, hydrocephalous, and tethered cord. She underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt and was advised detethering, but she was lost to follow-up and hence was excluded from the study group.
The data was analyzed for type of presentation, radiological features, indications for surgery, and results in follow-up. Patients were followed up in outpatient department and telephonic interviews were also conducted. Mean follow-up period was 34 months (range 12-110 months).
A systematic search was performed using the Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases to identify case series about adult TCS using the key words 'adult tethered cord syndrome', 'tethered cord', and 'detethering and occult spinal dysraphism'. Searches were restricted to articles in English language and those published upto December 2012. Twelve articles were thus found and analysis was done combining the observations of these studies, to find the rates of improvement in different symptoms.
| » Results|| |
Of the 24 patients included, 11 were men and 13 women. Patient's age ranged from 16 to 32 years [Table 1]. Typical cutaneous stigmata were present in only three patients, two had hyperpigmented patch over the lower back, while one patient had congenital dermal sinus over the lumbosacral area. Low backache was the most common presenting symptom in 18 patients, the average duration was 4.2 years (range 1-14 years). Other presenting symptoms are shown in [Table 2]. Bladder involvement was recorded in 12 patients. No patients had non-healing ulcers [Table 1].
MRI showed evidence of low-lying (below L2) conus in all 24 patients [Figure 1],[Figure 2] and [Figure 3] and no patient had epidermoid, dermoid, or lipoma of the cord. There was no evidence of bony spur or fibrous septa causing tethering [Table 1]. All patients, except one who had undergone shunt surgery for hydrocephalous, underwent detethering of the cord in which filum was detethered and divided as described in the literature. In the immediate postoperative period, one patient showed deterioration in power of extensor hallucis longus (EHL). At the time of final follow-up, 15 (83.3%) patients had shown improvement in backache. Weakness improved by at least one grade in seven patients (77.8%). Bladder symptoms improved in six patients (50%) [Table 2].
|Figure 1: T1-weighted MRI sagittal section showing low-lying cord ending at L4 with no other tethering lesion. MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: T1- and T2-weighted MRI sagittal sections showing low-lying cord ending at S1 with holocord syrinx|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: T2-weighted MRI sagittal section showing low-lying cord ending at L3 with no other tethering lesion|
Click here to view
Twelve articles were reviewed and their findings are presented in [Table 3]. Maximum improvement rates were seen in backache, while least in bladder disturbances [Table 4].
| » Discussion|| |
In normal fetal development before the 15-mm stage, the cord extends to the lower end of the sacrum.  Thereafter, the vertebral column lengthens caudad more rapidly than the spinal cord, and the conus ascends the canal to reach the L-3 level at about 30 weeks of gestation. At the 30-mm stage, the terminal conus formed from the caudal cell mass regresses to become the filum terminale, which normally remains thin and slightly redundant to allow for ascent of the conus. If at this stage the conus is trapped at a low level by an abnormally stout and short filum, a lipoma, a sagittal septum, fibrous adhesions, or the fibroneural stalk of an occult myelomeningocele, normal ascent would be arrested.
After the excellent work that Yamada et al. ,,,, have performed over the last 20 years, it seems that in both human and experimental animal models of TCS there is dysfunction in neuronal mitochondrial terminal oxidase in the electron transport chain. Furthermore, it has been shown by Schneider et al., using laser Doppler flowmetry, that there was a relative decrease in spinal cord blood flow in vivo in patients with pediatric TCS and following cord release, blood flow normalized to control levels.  The pathophysiology of adult-onset TCS is not very clear. It is still unclear that why do some patients with TCS remain asymptomatic till adulthood. Pang and Wilberger  postulated that the degree of traction on the conus is what determines the age of symptom onset.
Adult TCS is now being increasingly encountered by neurosurgeons of developing world and is perhaps more common than earlier thought. Increase in incidence can be attributed to easy availability of imaging modality like MRI than it was 2 decades. The incidence of occult spinal dysraphism (OSD) is unknown and, it is possible that some patients may remain asymptomatic and a diagnosis is never made, while in others with the congenital syndrome, may develop progressive deficits in adulthood, which can be caused by traction on the spinal cord due to sudden movement. ,,,, These may include bending movements, the lithotomy position during childbirth, movement occurring during road traffic accidents, and others.
The inclusion criteria for adult TCS appear to differ between reports, highlighting the lack of consensus. Gupta et al.,  excluded patients with post myelomeningocele repair, although they have acknowledged that patients with this type of lesion formed the largest group of adult patients presenting with TCS. On the other hand, Phi et al.,  have excluded from their review patients who had underwent meningomyelocele repair or lipoma removal earlier, but included two cases of "retethering" referred from other institutions. In contrast, patients with post myelomeningocele repair have been included in other studies of adult TCS. But in our study we did not include patients, who were operated for spina bifida in childhood or had any structural lesion in conus, as seen on imaging. In our series, we included patients in whom the conus was low-lying and no identifiable cause (other than thickened filum) was found.
The clinical presentation of our patients was similar to those reported in previous studies. ,, Similarities and differences exist between the adult and pediatric populations, and in many regards certain disparities between the two may be attributed to the young child's inability to communicate symptoms such as pain, sensory changes, urinary urgency, or incomplete voiding.  Adult patients predominantly present with pain, which is one of the major difference between adult and pediatric TCS.
The issue of surgery in newly diagnosed adults with OSD is still controversial.  It is commonly believed that children who have a congenital tethered cord benefit from surgical detethering because it prevents neurological deterioration.  The same rationale is extended to adult TCS as well. It is believed that patients with primary tethered cord will sooner or later experience worsening of neurological deficits if they do not undergo spinal cord untethering. ,, Better postoperative outcomes have been reported when this condition is treated promptly after the appearance of deficits. , This is supported by the good results following surgery in adult patients.
Other approach may be close follow-up including monitoring of motor power and urodynamic studies. Klekamp  studied 85 adult TCS patients and concluded that surgery in adult patients with a TCS should be reserved for those with symptoms and a conservative approach is warranted in adult patients without neurological deficits. As of now, there is no conclusive evidence in literature favoring either surgery or conservative management of adults with OSD without any deficit.
Intraoperative monitoring was not used in our study due to its unavailability. However, there are reports that intraoperative electromyography may be useful. Pang and Wilberger and Haro et al., , have argued that intraoperative spinal cord monitoring is indispensable to safe operation because functional neural elements are often embedded within the lipomatous tissues. In absence of EMG monitoring, our surgical strategy was to detether filum at the lowest possible and preferably L 5 -S 1 level. Before detethering, filum was always inspected and all roots adherent to it were dissected free and then detethering was achieved. In none of our patients fresh neurological deficits appeared. However, in one of the patients we encountered increase in weakness. Here a small root adherent to filum was accidentally sectioned.
Newly acquired deficits in adults may be reversible following timely surgery.  Not only the developed deficits are reversed, but potential complications in the coming years are obviated by the surgery. Yamada et al.,  has reported improvement in pain and motor function in all patients in their series, but they only included those with a tethered cord caused by a fibrous or lipomatous filum terminale. Pang and Wilberger  have stated that a majority of patients were free of pain following surgery. Iskandar et al.,  found improvement in pain status in over 80% of their patients. In our series, more than 80% of patients had improvement in backache and 78% had improvement in motor weakness.
The surgical complication rate is generally low. However, few studies have reported that it is slightly higher than that in children with the same disease, if one has to compare the data with those of pediatric series.  In our study, we did not encounter any immediate postoperative wound site-related complication. Long-term results were encouraging, justifying the need of surgery.
There is risk of retethering after detethering. However, the incidence of retethering and the indications for repeat surgery remain controversial. In the pediatric age group, Archibeck et al.,  have suggested that retethering is relatively common with 52% of patients requiring revision surgery by the age of 5 years in their series. In contrast, the incidence of retethering in adults seems to be significantly lower. Huttmann et al.,  has reported that over a mean follow-up period of 8 years, only 16% of patients required repeat detethering surgery. In the current study, no patient required repeated detethering procedures during the follow-up period.
In case of symptomatic patient with low-lying cord, detethering is an advisable option. However, in asymptomatic person with incidentally diagnosed low-lying cord there is lack of unanimity in opting for surgery or conservative follow-up [Figure 4]. Our philosophy is to explain the patient that option of surgery exists in contrast to conservative follow-up. In case of no radiological abnormality being detected and if the patient is not an active athlete, of child-bearing age, and does not have any other risk factors, an option of conservative follow can be exercised. During follow-up we monitor neurological status (sensory, motor, and bowel/bladder), urodynamic studies and MRI are repeated at regular intervals. In case of any new deficit or finding on investigations, surgery is advocated. However, we at times advocate surgery at the first presentation to the poor patients who are unable to afford the cost of repeat radiological/urological and clinical follow-up costs. Our patients are generally not covered by insurance policies and the cost of surgery at our center is just 153 USD (United States dollar) compared to 45-75 USD cost of single MRI imaging. Similarly, patient has to bear the costs of getting repeat urodynamic evaluation and travelling to our hospital. This aggressive approach suits these poor patients who demand 'best chance at the first go' itself. However, a prospective long-term outcome study for such patients is warranted to provide a definitive guideline.
Use of electrophysiological monitoring during detethering procedure has become a standard of care. We are not having this facility in our hospital and so it was not used. Moreover, all patients were not subjected to regular pre- and postoperative urodynamic evaluation. It is due to prohibitive cost of this investigation for some of the extremely poor patients and its nonavailability in some parts of the country 10 years back. However, nowadays it is an integral part of our treatment protocol for such patients. We lacked data of patients treated conservatively in our outpatient department. Prospective follow-up of these patients as cohorts can provide us with comparative results regarding surgery versus conservative treatment.
Pain is the most common symptom in adults with TCS. These patients are likely to benefit from surgery. The issue of surgery in asymptomatic adults with low-lying conus is controversial. On the basis of our experience, we have proposed our guidelines. However, a prospective, long-term, observational study is needed to answer this controversial question of 'Need for detethering in incidentally diagnosed low-lying conus in adult patients?'
| » References|| |
|1.||Fitz CR, Harwood Nash DC. The tethered conus. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975;125:515-23. |
|2.||Lee GY, Paradiso G, Tator CH, Gentili F, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. Surgical management of tethered cord syndrome in adults: Indications, techniques, and long-term outcomes in 60 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:123-31. |
|3.||Yamada S, Won, Kido D. Adult tethered cord syndrome: New classification correlated with symptomatology, imaging and pathophysiology. Neurosurg Q 2001;11:260-75. |
|4.||Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP. The tethered spinal cord: Its protean manifestations, diagnosis and surgical correction. Childs Brain 1976;2:145-55. |
|5.||Chapman P, Beyerl B. The tethered spinal cord, with particular reference to spinal lipoma and diastematomyelia. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1986. |
|6.||Yamada S, Won DJ, Yamada SM. Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome: Correlation with symptomatology. Neurosurg Focus 2004;16:E6. |
|7.||Pang D, Wilberger JE Jr. Tethered cord syndrome in adults. J Neurosurg 1982;57:32-47. |
|8.||Garces-Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ, Samuels R, Sciubba DM, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL, et al. Neurological outcome after surgical management of adult tethered cord syndrome. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:304-9. |
|9.||Romagna A, Suchorska B, Schwartz C, Tonn JC, Zausinger S. Detethering of a congenital tethered cord in adult patients: An outcome analysis. Acta Neurochir 2013;155:793-800. |
|10.||Iskandar BJ, Fulmer BB, Hadley MN, Oakes WJ. Congenital tethered spinal cord syndrome in adults. J Neurosurg 1998;88:958-61. |
|11.||Yamada S, Lonser RR. Adult tethered cord syndrome. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:319-23. |
|12.||Gupta SK, Khosla VK, Sharma BS, Mathuriya SN, Pathak A, Tewari MK. Tethered cord syndrome in adults. Surg Neurol 1999;52:362-9;discussion 370. |
|13.||Akay KM, Ersahin Y, Cakir Y. Tethered cord syndrome in adults. Acta Neurochir 2000;142:1111-5. |
|14.||Huttmann S, Krauss J, Collmann H, Sorensen N, Roosen K. Surgical management of tethered spinal cord in adults: Report of 54 cases. J Neurosurg 2001;95:173-8. |
|15.||van Leeuwen R, Notermans NC, Vandertop WP. Surgery in adults with tethered cord syndrome: Outcome study with independent clinical review. J Neurosurg 2001;94:205-9. |
|16.||Phi JH, Lee DY, Jahng TA, Chung CK, Kim HJ. Tethered cord syndrome in adulthood: Reconsidering the prognosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2004;36:114-9. |
|17.||Quinones-Hinojosa A, Gadkary CA, Gulati M, von Koch CS, Lyon R, Weinstein PR, et al. Neurophysiological monitoring for safe surgical tethered cord syndrome release in adults. Surg Neurol 2004;62:127-33;discussion 133-5. |
|18.||Yamada S, Iacono RP, Andrade T, Mandybur G, Yamada BS. Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1995;6:311-23. |
|19.||Yamada S, Iacono RP, Douglas CC. Tethered cord syndrome in adults. CHICAGO: American Association of Neurosurgeons; 1996. |
|20.||Yamada S, Sanders DC, Maeda G. Oxidative metabolism during and following ischemia of cat spinal cord. Neurological research 1981;3:1-16. |
|21.||Schneider SJ, Rosenthal AD, Greenberg BM, Danto J. A preliminary report on the use of laser-Doppler flowmetry during tethered spinal cord release. Neurosurgery 1993;32:214-7;discussion 217-8. |
|22.||Balagura S. Late neurological dysfunction in adult lumbosacral lipoma with tethered cord. Neurosurgery 1984;15:724-6. |
|23.||Klekamp J. Tethered cord syndrome in adults. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;15:258-70. |
|24.||Russell NA, Benoit BG, Joaquin AJ. Diastematomyelia in adults. A review. Pediatr Neurosurg 1990;16:252-7. |
|25.||Prasad VS, Sengar RL, Sahu BP, Immaneni D. Diastematomyelia in adults. Modern imaging and operative treatment. Clin Imaging 1995;19:270-4. |
|26.||Salvati M, Orlando Ramundo E, Artico M, Martini S, Caruso R, Fortuna A. The tethered cord syndrome in the adult. Report of three cases and review of the literature. Zentralbl Neurochir 1990;51:91-3. |
|27.||Rajpal S, Tubbs RS, George T, Oakes WJ, Fuchs HE, Hadley MN, et al. Tethered cord due to spina bifida occulta presenting in adulthood: A tricenter review of 61 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;6:210-5. |
|28.||Klekamp J, Raimondi AJ, Samii M. Occult dysraphism in adulthood: Clinical course and management. Childs Nerv Syst 1994;10:312-20. |
|29.||Iskandar BJ, Fulmer BB, Hadley MN, Oakes WJ. Congenital tethered spinal cord syndrome in adults. Neurosurg Focus 2001;10:e7. |
|30.||James C, Lassman LP. Spina bifida occulta: Orthopedic, radiological and neurosurgical aspects. London: Academic Press; 1981. |
|31.||Al-Mefty O, Kandzari S, Fox JL. Neurogenic bladder and the tethered spinal cord syndrome. J Urol 1979;122:112-5. |
|32.||Kaplan WE, McLone DG, Richards I. The urological manifestations of the tethered spinal cord. J Urol 1988;140:1285-8. |
|33.||Keating MA, Rink RC, Bauer SB, Krarup C, Dyro FM, Winston KR, et al. Neurourological implications of the changing approach in management of occult spinal lesions. J Urol 1988;140:1299-301. |
|34.||Kondo A, Kato K, Kanai S, Sakakibara T. Bladder dysfunction secondary to tethered cord syndrome in adults: Is it curable? J Urol 1986;135:313-6. |
|35.||Haro H, Komori H, Okawa A, Kawabata S, Shinomiya K. Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for tethered cord syndrome. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004;17:16-20. |
|36.||Anderson FM. Occult spinal dysraphism: A series of 73 cases. Pediatrics 1975;55:826-35. |
|37.||Archibeck MJ, Smith JT, Carroll KL, Davitt JS, Stevens PM. Surgical release of tethered spinal cord: Survivorship analysis and orthopedic outcome. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:773-6. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||More preoperative flexibility implies adequate neural pliability for curve correction without prophylactic untethering in scoliosis patients with asymptomatic tethered spinal cord, a retrospective study
| ||Zhenhai Zhou,Hongqi Zhang,Chaofeng Guo,Honggui Yu,Longjie Wang,Qiang Guo |
| ||BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017; 18(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Surgical treatments on adult tethered cord syndrome
| ||Jun Gao,Xiangyi Kong,Zhimin Li,Tianyu Wang,Yongning Li |
| ||Medicine. 2016; 95(46): e5454 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Tethered Cord SyndromeA Study of the Short-Term Effects of Surgical Detethering on Markers of Neuronal Injury and Electrophysiologic Parameters
| ||Ved Prakash Maurya,Medha Rajappa,Vaibhav Wadwekar,Sunil K. Narayan,Deepak Barathi,Venkatesh S. Madhugiri |
| ||World Neurosurgery. 2016; 94: 239 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||An Unusual Presentation of Adult Tethered Cord Syndrome Associated with Severe Chest and Upper Back Pain
| ||Shotaro Kanda,Toru Akiyama,Hirotaka Chikuda,Takehiko Yamaguchi,Kazuo Saita |
| ||Case Reports in Orthopedics. 2015; 2015: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Fully Endoscopic Interlaminar Detethering of Spinal Cord in Tethered Cord Syndrome: A Case Report and Technical Description
| ||Mehmet Sabri Gürbüz,Salih Aydín,Deniz Bozdogan |
| ||Korean Journal of Spine. 2015; 12(4): 287 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|