| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||444 |
| Printed||3 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||28 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 741-759
The 100 Most-Cited Papers in Traumatic Injury of the Spine
Muhammad B Tariq1, Osmond C Wu2, Marc A Agulnick3, Manish K Kasliwal2
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU-Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York; Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
2 Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU-Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
|Date of Web Publication||26-Aug-2020|
Dr. Manish K Kasliwal
11100 Euclid Avenue, Mailstop HAN 5042, Cleveland, OH 44106
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Traumatic injury to the spine can be a complex diagnostic and therapeutic entity often with devastating consequences. Outside of the isolated vertebral column injury costs; annual costs associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) are estimated to exceed $9.7 billion.
Objective: To identify the 100 most-cited articles on spine trauma.
Methods: The Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation indexing service was queried. The articles were sorted by times cited in descending order. Two independent reviewers reviewed the article titles and abstracts to identify the top 100 most-cited articles.
Results: The top 100 articles were found to be cited between 108 (articles #99-100) and 1595 times (article #1). The most-cited basic science article was cited 340 times (#12 on the top 100 list). The oldest article on the top 100 list was from 1953 and most recent from 2012. The number of patients, when applicable, in a study ranged from 9 (article #34) to 34,069 (article #5). Top 100 articles were published in 41 different journals with a wide range of specialities and fields most commonly multidisciplinary. Basic science research encompassed 34 of the 100 articles on the list.
Conclusions: We present the 100 most-cited articles in spinal trauma with emphases on important contributions from both basic science and clinical research across a wide range of authors, specialties, patient populations, and countries. Recognizing some of the most important contributions in the field of spinal trauma may provide insight and guide future work.
Keywords: Acute spine injury, acute vertebral fracture, spinal cord 2 injury, spinal injury, spine, spine trauma, trauma
Key Messages: This article reviews the most cited papers in the complex field of spinal trauma, reviewing both basic science and clinical research. It also emphasizes the wide diversity in the field while reviewing current trends of scientific investigation in traumatic injuries to the spine.
|How to cite this article:|
Tariq MB, Wu OC, Agulnick MA, Kasliwal MK. The 100 Most-Cited Papers in Traumatic Injury of the Spine. Neurol India 2020;68:741-59
Traumatic injury to the spine can be a complex diagnostic and therapeutic entity often with devastating consequences. Fractures of the vertebral column represent 3-6% of all skeletal injuries. Furthermore, spine injury risks the stability of the vertebral column with potential harm to adjacent neurological structures. As such, injury to the spinal cord itself occurs in 15-40 patients per million and represents a devastating event with tremendous personal, psychosocial, and financial consequences. Annual costs associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) are estimated to exceed $9.7 billion. No wonder, extensive research over the past few decades has focused on describing and elucidating the mechanisms as well as treatment options of traumatic injury to the spine.
Treatment of injuries to the spine commonly involves a multidisciplinary team across different subspecialties including Orthopedic surgery, Neurosurgery, Emergency Medicine, Trauma surgery, Radiology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Critical care. Therefore, scientific literature and research on spinal trauma encompass a wide host of neuroscientists, researchers, speciality fields, countries, and scientific journals.
One method of identifying scientific studies that have a high impact on medicine is through citation analysis. This type of analysis has previously been utilized to describe literature on spinal oncology, cervical spine surgery, SCI, spinal fractures, lumbar spine surgery, and spinal deformity surgery.,,,,, However, there is an absence of such an effort encompassing the broad subject of spinal trauma.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the 100 most-cited articles on traumatic injury to the spine to identify some of the most essential scientific contributions to the literature in this field.
| » Methods|| |
The Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation indexing service was queried. The search algorithm ([spine OR spinal OR vertebral] AND [acute OR emergent OR trauma OR acute fracture]) was used to identify articles of interest. All articles relating to the topic of interest available in English and published prior to May 2018 were included. The articles were sorted by times cited in descending order. Two independent reviewers reviewed the article titles and abstracts to identify the top 100 most-cited articles related to the area of traumatic injury to the spine. The following variables were recorded: author, title, year of publication, journal of publication, author specialty, study type, spinal level studied, number of patients, male to female ratio, mean or median age, country of origin, and the number of citations. To account for the year of publication, citations per year (CPY) index was calculated as previously described. Level of evidence for studies was designated according to criteria set by the North American Spine Society (https://www.spine.org/documents/researchclinicalcare/levelsofevidence.pdf).
| » Results|| |
Articles pertaining to spinal trauma were searched and the top 100 were identified based on the number of times they were cited [Table 1].- The top 100 articles were found to be cited between 108 (articles #99-100) and 1595 times (article #1). The most-cited basic science article was cited 340 times (#12 on the top 100 list). Collectively, all articles were cited a total of 22,788 times (mean of 227.9 citations for each paper). The oldest article on the top 100 list was from 1953. The most recent article on the list was from 2012.
Based on the CPY index, the top article was cited 57 times per year and was also #1 on the top 100 list. The bottom article had been cited 1.8 times per year (#79 on top 100 list).
The number of patients, when applicable, in a study ranged from 9 (article #34) to 34,069 (article #5). The patient age (median) ranged from 10.3 years (article #47) to 77 years (article #66) with a median age of 40 years.
The United States was the country with the highest number of articles (62 of 100 articles); followed by Canada (15 articles). The most published decade was the 1990s with 36 articles followed by 2000s with 30 articles on the top 100 list [Graph 1].
The author with the most number of articles on the top 100 list was M. B. Bracken with 7 articles,,,,,,; followed by J.R. Hoffman,, and I.M. Tarlov,, with 3 articles each.
Top 100 articles were published in 41 different journals, with the Journal of Neurosurgery containing the most studies (17 articles) followed by Radiology (9 articles) and Experimental Neurology (6 articles) [Table 2].
A wide range of specialties and fields originated the top 100 articles with multidisciplinary being the most common with 33 articles followed by neurosurgery, radiology, and epidemiology with 19, 10, and 7 articles, respectively [Table 3].
The level of injury on the spine most commonly studied was SCI at any level (32 articles), followed by cervical injury (26 articles), and thoracic injury (21 articles) [Graph 2].
When stratified by study type, there were: 34 basic science articles, 7 case series, 1 cost-effectiveness/theoretical model, 1 appraisal study, 17 prospective cohorts, 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 6 retrospective cohorts, 17 review articles, 4 surveys, 2 systematic reviews, and 2 non-randomized trials.
| » Discussion|| |
This study identifies the topics and authors that have made the greatest impact in the field of traumatic injury of the spine over the course of the last century. The identification of the most cited work in the field allows us to gain insight into the history, advancements, and current trends of research in spinal trauma. The field of spinal trauma has grown significantly during the last decades and our study highlights the 100 most-cited articles in the field. Considering the rapid growth of medical literature in the current era, the present effort to filter the 100 most-cited papers in the field of spine trauma could be extremely valuable for clinicians and all other allied subspecialties involved to keep them abreast with the most relevant literature that could assist in better patient care and also help direct further research efforts in this field.
The most-cited clinical and overall cited article was found to be “A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury - Results of the 2nd National Acute Spinal-Cord Injury Study“ by Bracken et al. (1990) published in the New England Journal of Medicine. This study presents the results of a multicenter trial on the efficacy of corticosteroid use after SCI. This is a topic of high debate in the literature with subsequent literature rebutting the utility of corticosteroids., Therefore, it is not unexpected to see this study in the 100 most-cited list.
The second most-cited overall article was “The 3 column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal-injuries“ by F. Denis (1983) published in Spine. This is a landmark observational study describing the 3 column theory of spinal stability as it relates to spinal injuries. Since the stability of the spine is one of many key considerations to surgical management of patients with a spine injury, the impact of this study can be appreciated in theoretical and clinical practice.
The most-cited basic science article was “ Acute inflammatory response in spinal cord following impact injury“ by Carlson et al. (1998) published in Experimental Neurology. This paper highlights the mechanistic role of secondary injury to the spinal cord after blunt trauma using a rat model. The authors quantitively correlate the inflammatory response as measured by the number of macrophages and reactive microglia with tissue damage. This study sets the precedence that treatments targeting the inflammatory response after SCI may be beneficial in mitigating secondary injury. Furthermore, this study falls in line with the highly discussed topic of SCI treatments similar to the National acute spinal cord injury study (NASCIS) above.
The top 10 most-cited studies focused on the topics of SCI and spinal stability with the inclusion of all three NASCIS trials, Canadian C-spine rule study, and 3-column spine articles. This highlights the most popular topics in spinal trauma, which can be summarized as themes of vertebral column stability and SCI. Both topics, which are integrally related to one another with damage to the vertebral column either directly correlating or indirectly risking damage to the spinal cord or nerves. Due to the tremendous consequences from damage or risk of damage to neural tissue, the high amount of scientific investigation concentrated around it can be recognized.
Looking at the top-cited articles in each field of medicine can further help identify certain trends. For example, the top papers were published in journals considered to be very high impact globally and/or within the specific field. In Neurosurgery, the most-cited article “Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal-cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms” by Tator et al. (1991) was published in Journal of Neurosurgery. In Orthopaedic Surgery, “The 3 column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal-injuries” by Denis (1983) was published in Spine. In Trauma, “Cervical spine injuries in children: a review of 103 patients treated consecutively at a level 1 pediatric trauma center” by Brown et al. (2001) was published in Journal Pediatric Surgery. In Emergency Medicine, “Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma” by Hoffman et al. (2000) was published in NEJM. In Radiology, “Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial” by Klazen (2010) was published in Lancet.Furthermore, the highest cited articles in the various fields did not convey to a specific time period or particular spine level or theme. It is not surprising that the highest cited articles were in the highest impact journals since the impact factor is one of the known measures of a journal's significance within a field. From molecular pathophysiology and initial diagnostic evaluation to final treatment, our study highlights the current leading studies in all forms of traumatic injury of the spine. In addition, we highlight the value of basic science as well as clinical literature. From bench to bedside, we present a wide diversity of study types: case studies, review articles, clinical trials, cohort studies, and basic science articles. As such, 34 of the 100 studies in the top 100 list were basic science, which emphasizes the role of experimental research in the scientific investigation of traumatic injury to the spine.
Some limitations can be appreciated in our study. First, it has previously been suggested that citation analyses may favor older studies because these studies have more time to accumulate citations. To minimize this potential bias, we utilized the CPY index, which takes into account time since publication. Furthermore, the Web of Science has commonly been used for citation analyses similar to ours; we acknowledge that this index may not include citations from journals or textbooks written in other languages. Second, although articles were ranked according to the number of citations, we excluded some studies in a subjective manner (that did not fit inclusion criteria) and it may be possible that other relevant articles were missed. To minimize this, we had two independent reviewers screen through the list of top 100 articles. Third, the topic of spinal trauma encompasses a wide range of complex pathologies, etiologies, and extensive research. Therefore, it may be possible that some relevant articles, such as those focusing on chronic and long-term effects of spinal trauma, may have not been captured by our search. Finally, it is worth noting that the number of times an article has been cited does not directly reflect its quality.
| » Conclusions|| |
We present the 100 most-cited articles in spinal trauma with emphases on important contributions from both basic science and clinical research across a wide range of authors, specialities, patient populations, and countries. Thirty-four of the 100 articles were basic science investigations. The most popular topics in spinal trauma can be broadly encompassed as themes of vertebral column stability and SCI. Recognition of some of the most important contributions from a wide variety of research studies encompassing bench to bedside in the field of spinal trauma may guide future work.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| » References|| |
Looby S, Flanders A. Spine trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 2011;49:129-63.
Sekhon LHS, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26:S2-12.
French DD, Campbell RR, Sabharwal S, Nelson AL, Palacios PA, Gavin-Dreschnack D. Health care costs for patients with chronic spinal cord injury in the Veterans Health Administration. J Spinal Cord Med 2007;30:477-81.
Berkowitz M, editor. Spinal Cord Injury: An Analysis of Medical and Social Costs. New York, NY: Demos; 1998.
Donnally C III, Rivera S, Rush A III, Bondar K, Boden A, Wang M. The 100 most influential spine fracture publications. J Spine Surg 2019;5:97-109.
Jani RH, Prabhu AV, Zhou JJ, Alan N, Agarwal N. Citation analysis of the most influential articles on traumatic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2020;43;31-38.
Skovrlj B, Steinberger J, Guzman JZ, Overley SC, Qureshi SA, Caridi JM, et al
. The 100 most influential articles in cervical spine surgery. Glob Spine J 2016;6:69-79.
Murray MR, Wang T, Schroeder GD, Hsu WK. The 100 most cited spine articles. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2059-69.
Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F, Witiw CD, Mansouri A, Alotaibi N, Eagles M, et al
. Highly cited works in spinal disorders: The top 100 most cited papers published in spine journals. Spine 2018;43:1746-55.
De la Garza-Ramos R, Benvenutti-Regato M, Caro-Osorio E. The 100 most-cited articles in spinal oncology. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:810-23.
Eshraghi A, Osman NAA, Gholizadeh H, Ali S, Shadgan B. 100 top-cited scientific papers in limb prosthetics. Biomed Eng Online 2013;12:119.
Bracken MB, Collins WF, Freeman DF, Shepard MJ, Wagner FW, Silten RM, et al
. Efficacy of methylprednisolone in acute spinal-cord injury. JAMA 1984;251:45-52.
Bracken MB, Freeman DH, Hellenbrand K. Incidence of acute traumatic hospitalized spinal-cord injury in the United States, 1970-1977. Am J Epidemiol 1981;113:615-22.
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, Holford TR, Baskin DS, Eisenberg HM, et al
. Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal-cord injury: 1-year follow-up data - results of the 2nd
National Acute Spinal-Cord Injury Study. J Neurosurg 1992;76:23-31.
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, Holford TR, Young W, Baskin DS, et al
. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the 2nd
National Acute Spinal-Cord Injury Study. N
Engl J Med 1990;322:1405-11.
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Hellenbrand KG, Collins WF, Leo LS, Freeman DF, et al
. Methylprednisolone and neurological function 1 year after spinal-cord injury. Results of the National Acute Spinal-Cord Injury Study. J Neurosurg 1985;63:704-13.
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Holford TR, Leo-Summers L, Aldrich EF, Fazl M, et al
. Methylprednisolone or tirilazad mesylate administration after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow up. Results of the third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 1998;89:699-706.
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Holford TR, LeoSummers L, Aldrich EF, Fazl M, et al
. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997;277:1597-604.
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI, Natl Emergency XRUSG. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N
Engl J Med 2000;343:94-9.
Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, Mower W, Luo JS, Zucker M. Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: A prospective-study. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:1454-60.
Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, Mower WR. Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: Methodology of the national emergency X-radiography utilization study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:461-9.
Tarlov IM. Acute spinal-cord compression paralysis. J Neurosurg 1972;36:10-20.
Tarlov IM, Klinger H. Spinal cord compression studies. II. Time limits for recovery after acute compression in dogs. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954;71:271-90.
Tarlov IM, Klinger H, Vitale S. Spinal cord compression studies. I. Experimental techniques to produce acute and gradual compression. Ama Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1953;70:813-9.
Hurlbert RJ. Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: An inappropriate standard of care. J Neurosurg 2000;93(1 Suppl):1-7.
Hurlbert RJ. The role of steroids in acute spinal cord injury: An evidence-based analysis. Spine 2001;26:S39-46.
Denis F. The 3 column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal-injuries. Spine 1983;8:817-31.
Carlson SL, Parrish ME, Springer JE, Doty K, Dossett L. Acute inflammatory response in spinal cord following impact injury. Exp Neurol 1998;151:77-88.
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ, et al
. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286:1841-8.
Tator CH, Fehlings MG. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal-cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg 1991;75:15-26.
Brown RL, Brunn MA, Garcia VF. Cervical spine injuries in children: A review of 103 patients treated consecutively at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:1107-14.
Klazen CAH, Lohle PNM, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, et al
. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): An open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2010;376:1085-92.
Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006;295:90-3.
Seglen PO. Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:224-9.
Bohlman HH. Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of 300 hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:1119-42.
Dumont RJ, Okonkwo DO, Verma RS, Hurlbert RJ, Boulos PT, Ellegala DB, et al
. Acute spinal cord injury, part I: Pathophysiologic mechanisms. Clin Neuropharmacol 2001;24:254-64.
Schneider RC, Cherry G, Pantek H. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury; with special reference to the mechanisms involved in hyperextension injuries of cervical spine. J Neurosurg 1954;11:546-77.
Balentine JD. Pathology of experimental spinal-cord trauma. I. Necrotic lesion as a function of vascular injury. Lab Invest 1978;39:236-53.
Schnell L, Fearn S, Klassen H, Schwab ME, Perry VH. Acute inflammatory responses to mechanical lesions in the CNS: Differences between brain and spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 1999;11:3648-58.
Rowland JW, Hawryluk GWJ, Kwon B, Fehlings MG. Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: Promise on the horizon. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E2.
Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, et al
. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N
Engl J Med 2003;349:2510-8.
Tator CH. Update on the pathophysiology and pathology of acute spinal-cord injury. Brain Pathol 1995;5:407-13.
Gorio A, Gokmen N, Erbayraktar S, Yilmaz O, Madaschi L, Cichetti C, et al
. Recombinant human erythropoietin counteracts secondary injury and markedly enhances neurological recovery from experimental spinal cord trauma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:9450-5.
Tang XF, Davies JE, Davies SJA. Changes in distribution, cell associations, and protein expression levels of NG2, neurocan, phosphacan, brevican, versican V2, and tenascin-C during acute to chronic maturation of spinal cord scar tissue. J Neurosci Res 2003;71:427-44.
Constantini S, Young W. The effects of methylprednisolone and the ganglioside GM1 on acute spinal-cord injury in rats. J Neurosurg 1994;80:97-111.
Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS, et al
. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: Results of the surgical timing in acute spinal cord injury study (STASCIS). PLoS One 2012;7:e32037.
Faden AI, Jacobs TP, Holaday JW. Thyrotropin-releasing-hormone improves neurologic recovery after spinal trauma in cats. N
Engl J Med 1981;305:1063-7.
Amar AP, Levy ML. Pathogenesis and pharmacological strategies for mitigating secondary damage in acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 1999;44:1027-39.
Ducker TB, Kindt GW, Kempe LG. Pathological findings in acute experimental spinal cord trauma. J Neurosurg 1971;35:700-8.
Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA. Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 2003;114:257-65.
Beck KD, Nguyen HX, Galvan MD, Salazar DL, Woodruff TM, Anderson AJ. Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: Evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment. Brain 2010;133:433-47.
Flanders AE, Schaefer DM, Doan HT, Mishkin MM, Gonzalez CF, Northrup BE. Acute cervical-spine trauma: Correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 1990;177:25-33.
Hadley MN, Zabramski JM, Browner CM, Rekate H, Sonntag VK. Pediatric spinal trauma-review of 122 cases of spinal-cord and vertebral column injuries. J Neurosurg 1988;68:18-24.
Rivlin AS, Tator CH. Effect of duration of acute spinal-cord compression in a new acute cord injury model in rat. Surg Neurol 1978;10:39-43.
Wrathall JR, Choiniere D, Teng YD. Dose-dependent reduction of tissue loss and functional impairment after spinal-cord trauma with the AMPA/kainate antagonist NBQX. J Neurosci 1994;14:6598-607.
Grossman SD, Rosenberg LJ, Wrathall JR. Temporal-spatial pattern of acute neuronal and glial loss after spinal cord contusion. Exp Neurol 2001;168:273-82.
Anderson DK, Hall ED. Pathophysiology of spinal-cord trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:987-92.
Li GL, Brodin G, Farooque M, Funa K, Holtz A, Wang WL, et al
. Apoptosis and expression of Bcl-2 after compression trauma to rat spinal cord. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1996;55:280-9.
Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D, Miner M, Cotler HB, Lee KF, et al
. Acute spinal-cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5-T. Radiology 1987;164:837-43.
Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Deyo RA. Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 1999;212:117-25.
Hall ED, Braughler JM. Glucocorticoid mechanisms in acute spinal-cord injury: A review and therapeutic rationale. Surg Neurol 1982;18:320-7.
Balentine JD. Pathology of experimental spinal-cord trauma. II. Ultrastructure of axons and myelin. Lab Invest 1978;39:254-66.
Vale FL, Burns J, Jackson AB, Hadley MN. Combined medical and surgical treatment after acute spinal cord injury: Results of a prospective pilot study to assess the merits of aggressive medical resuscitation and blood pressure management. J Neurosurg 1997;87:239-46.
Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D, Sygen Study G. The Sygen (R) multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine 2001;26:S87-98.
Means ED, Anderson DK, Waters TR, Kalaf L. Effect of methylprednisolone in compression trauma to the feline spinal-cord. J Neurosurg 1981;55:200-8.
Miyanji F, Furlan JC, Aarabi B, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR Imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome-Prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:820-7.
Berne JD, Velmahos GC, El-Tawil Q, Demetriades D, Asensio JA, Murray JA, et al
. Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: A prospective study. J Trauma 1999;47:896-902.
Gledhill RF, Harrison BM, McDoanld WI. Demyelination and remyelination after acute spinal-cord compression. Exp Neurol 1973;38:472-87.
Short DJ, El Masry WS, Jones PW. High dose methylprednisolone in the management of acute spinal cord injury - A systematic review from a clinical perspective. Spinal Cord 2000;38:273-86.
Thomas AJ, Nockels RP, Pan HQ, Shaffrey CI, Chopp M. Progesterone is neuroprotective after acute experimental spinal cord trauma in rats. Spine 1999;24:2134-8.
Crosby ET. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology 2006;104:1293-318.
Coleman WP, Benzel E, Cahill DW, Ducker T, Geisler F, Green B, et al
. A critical appraisal of the reporting of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (II and III) of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:185-99.
Happel RD, Smith KP, Banik NL, Powers JM, Hogan EL, Balentine JD. CA-2+-Accumulation in experimental spinal-cord trauma. Brain Res 1981;211:476-9.
Pointillart V, Petitjean ME, Wiart L, Vital JM, Lassie P, Thicoipe M, et al
. Pharmacological therapy of spinal cord injury during the acute phase. Spinal Cord 2000;38:71-6.
Vroemen M, Aigner L, Winkler J, Weidner N. Adult neural progenitor cell grafts survive after acute spinal cord injury and integrate along axonal pathways. Eur J Neurosci 2003;18:743-51.
Dolan EJ, Tator CH, Endrenyi L. The value of decompression for acute experimental spinal-cord compression injury. J Neurosurg 1980;53:749-55.
Sandler AN, Tator CH. Effect of acute spinal-cord compression injury on regional spinal-cord blood-flow in primates. J Neurosurg 1976;45:660-76.
Sandler AN, Tator CH. Review of effect of spinal-cord trauma on vessels and blood-flow in spinal-cord. J Neurosurg 1976;45:638-46.
Behrmann DL, Bresnahan JC, Beattie MS. Modeling of acute spinal-cord injury in the rat: Neuroprotection and enhanced recovery with methylprednisolone, U-74006F and YM-14673. Exp Neurol 1994;126:61-75.
Cyteval C, Sarrabere MPB, Roux JO, Thomas E, Jorgensen C, Blotman F, et al
. Acute osteoporotic vertebral collapse: Open study on percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement in 20 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1685-90.
Hawryluk GWJ, Rowland J, Kwon BK, Fehlings MG. Protection and repair of the injured spinal cord: A review of completed, ongoing, and planned clinical trials for acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E14.
Diamond TH, Bryant C, Browne L, Clark WA. Clinical outcomes after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A 2-year non-randomised trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Med J Aust 2006;184:113-7.
Cloward RB. Treatment of acute fractures and fracture-dislocations of cervical spine by vertebral-body fusion. A report of 11 cases. J Neurosurg 1961;18:201-9.
Chen D, Apple DF, Hudson LM, Bode R. Medical complications during acute rehabilitation following spinal cord injury - Current experience of the model systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1397-401.
Schnell L, Fearn S, Schwab ME, Perry VH, Anthony DC. Cytokine-induced acute inflammation in the brain and spinal cord. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999;58:245-54.
Cafferty WBJ, Duffy P, Huebner E, Strittmatter SM. MAG and OMgp synergize with Nogo-A to restrict axonal growth and neurological recovery after spinal cord trauma. J Neurosci 2010;30:6825-37.
Haldeman S, Kohlbeck FJ, McGregor M. Risk factors and precipitating neck movements causing vertebrobasilar artery dissection after cervical trauma and spinal manipulation. Spine 1999;24:785-94.
Lehmann KG, Lane JG, Piepmeier JM, Batsford WP. Cardiovascular-abnormalities accompanying acute spinal-cord injury in humans: Incidence, time course and severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:46-52.
Kwon BK, Okon E, Hillyer J, Mann C, Baptiste D, Weaver LC, et al
. A systematic review of non-invasive pharmacologic neuroprotective treatments for acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2011;28:1545-88.
Hall ED, Yonkers PA, Andrus PK, Cox JW, Anderson DK. Biochemistry and pharmacology of lipid antioxidants in acute brain and spinal-cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1992;9:S425-42.
Como JJ, Diaz JJ, Dunham CM, Chiu WC, Duane TM, Capella JM, et al
. Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma: Update from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines committee. J Trauma 2009;67:651-9.
Baur A, Stabler A, Arbogast S, Duerr HR, Bartl R, Reiser M. Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: Fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology 2002;225:730-5.
Golder FJ, Mitchell GS. Spinal synaptic enhancement with acute intermittent hypoxia improves respiratory function after chronic cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2005;25:2925-32.
Grossman MD, Reilly PM, Gillett T, Gillett D. National survey of the incidence of cervical spine injury and approach to cervical spine clearance in US trauma centers. J Trauma 1999;47:684-90.
Hogan GJ, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Scalea TM. Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: Is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal. Radiology 2005;237:106-13.
Price C, Makintubee S, Herndon W, Istre GR. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal-cord injury and acute hospitalization and rehabilitation charges for spinal-cord injuries in Oklahoma, 1988-1990. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139:37-47.
Schenarts PJ, Diaz J, Kaiser C, Carrillo Y, Eddy V, Morris JA. Prospective comparison of admission computed tomographic scan and plain films of the upper cervical spine in trauma patients with altered mental status. J Trauma 2001;51:663-8.
Wrathall JR, Teng YD, Choiniere D. Amelioration of functional deficits from spinal cord trauma with systemically administered NBQX, an antagonist of non-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Exp Neurol 1996;137:119-26.
Nunez DB, Zuluaga A, FuentesBernardo DA, Rivas LA, Becerra JL. Cervical spine trauma: How much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT? Radiographics 1996;16:1307-18.
Song GQ, Cechvala C, Resnick DK, Dempsey RJ, Rao VLR. GeneChip((R)) analysis after acute spinal cord injury in rat. J Neurochem 2001;79:804-15.
Cairns DM, Adkins RH, Scott MD. Pain and depression in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: Origins of chronic problematic pain? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:329-35.
Rivlin AS, Tator CH. Regional spinal-cord blood-flow in rats after severe cord trauma. J Neurosurg 1978;49:844-53.
Schindler-Ivens S, Shields RK. Low frequency depression of H-reflexes in humans with acute and chronic spinal-cord injury. Exp Brain Res 2000;133:233-41.
Cuenod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, Hamze B, Naouri JF, Chapaux X, et al
. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: Appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 1996;199:541-9.
Kwon BK, Stammers AMT, Belanger LM, Bernardo A, Chan D, Bishop CM, et al
. Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of injury severity in acute human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:669-82.
Mirvis SE, Geisler FH, Jelinek JJ, Joslyn JN, Gellad F. Acute cervical-spine trauma: Evaluation with 1.5-T MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166:807-16.
Hackney DB, Asato R, Joseph PM, Carvlin MJ, McGrath JT, Grossman RI, et al
. Hemorrhage and edema in acute spinal-cord compression: Demonstration by MR imaging. Radiology 1986;161:387-90.
Carmel JB, Galante A, Soteropoulos P, Tolias P, Recce M, Young W, et al
. Gene expression profiling of acute spinal cord injury reveals spreading inflammatory signals and neuron loss. Physiol Genomics 2001;7:201-13.
Friedman D, Flanders A, Thomas C, Millar W. Vertebral artery injury after acute cervical-spine trauma: Rate of occurrence as detected by MR-angiography and assessment of clinical consequences. Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:443-7.
Resnick DK, Graham SH, Dixon CE, Marion DW. Role of cyclooxygenase 2 in acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:1005-13.
Zhang ZY, Krebs CJ, Guth L. Experimental analysis of progressive necrosis after spinal cord trauma in the rat: Etiological role of the inflammatory response. Exp Neurol 1997;143:141-52.
Krassioukov AV, Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. Autonomic dysreflexia in acute spinal cord injury: An under-recognized clinical entity. J Neurotrauma 2003;20:707-16.
Roberts D, Lee W, Cuneo RC, Wittmann J, Ward G, Flatman R, et al
. Longitudinal study of bone turnover after acute spinal cord injury. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:415-22.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]