Atormac
briv
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 2929  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (1,960 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusion
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed244    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 931-936

A Neural Substrate for Mirror Agnosia and Mirror Image Agnosia – Is it a Network disorder?


1 Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Neuro Imaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission12-Apr-2020
Date of Decision30-Oct-2020
Date of Acceptance20-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication2-Sep-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sadanandavalli Retnaswami Chandra
Faculty Block, Neurocentre, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS) Bangalore - 560 029, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.325339

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


Background: Reflected image processing is a unique brain function and its abnormalities result in problems of localizing, recognizing the images, and utilizing this information in everyday life.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize clinical and neuropsychological profiles and to identify the probable neural substrate for this phenomenon in major cognitive disorder.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective study from February 2015 to May 2017 in patients with Major Cognitive Disorder (MCD, DSM-5 criteria). All patients were tested for problems in reflected image processing using the detailed protocol after ethical approval of the institute and consent. They also underwent a detailed neuropsychological evaluation, biochemical tests and neuroimaging (structural, diffusion, and resting-state functional MRI) as per established protocol.
Results: Of the 18 patients, 11 had mirror agnosia (MA), 5 had mirror image agnosia (MIA) and 2 had both. MRI of MA patients showed parietal atrophy and whereas diffuse pattern of atrophy was seen with MIA. In the MA group, the left superior longitudinal fasciculus showed significantly greater fractional anisotropy and the left angular gyrus showed increased functional connectivity with left anterior cingulate, left dorsolateral prefrontal and bilateral posterior cingulate regions.
Conclusion: Mirror image processing defects were not related to the type of MCD, severity or pattern of neuropsychological dysfunction. There are structural and functional alterations in localized regions as well as both hemispheres. Therefore, it is more likely to be a network disorder, irrespective of the MCD type or severity.


Keywords: Free surfer, major cognitive disorder, mirror agnosia, mirror image agnosia, network disorder
Key Message: Mirror image processing deficits could be a Network Disorder.


How to cite this article:
Sivaram S, Chandra SR, Venkatasubramanian G, Holla B, Bhat M. A Neural Substrate for Mirror Agnosia and Mirror Image Agnosia – Is it a Network disorder?. Neurol India 2021;69:931-6

How to cite this URL:
Sivaram S, Chandra SR, Venkatasubramanian G, Holla B, Bhat M. A Neural Substrate for Mirror Agnosia and Mirror Image Agnosia – Is it a Network disorder?. Neurol India [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 27];69:931-6. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2021/69/4/931/325339




Mirror images appear to have spatial left to right and front to back inversion. In humans, mirror image of one's own self-processing is believed to take place through a phenomenon called as mental diplopia where a person seeing his mirror image has dual representation - one for the real body schema of self and one for the reflected image. Cognitive understanding is required to recognize that the reflected image is from the opposite visual field. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5] When we look at our self in a mirror, it appears as if a person is standing behind the mirror at the same distance and facing us. However, in reality it is a front to back inversion, as mirrors just reflect what is in front of it and not right to left.[6]

Mirror agnosia exists when patients face difficulty in spatially localizing the reflected image. [7],[8],[9] They mostly jam into the mirror in search of the object. Mirror image agnosia is the situation where patient misinterprets the reflected image as someone else though there is no error in spatial localization. [1],[4],[5],[10] We found patients with MCD who showed curious interest in the Mirrors, conversing, fighting with their images, breaking mirrors while searching for objects inside and addressing the self-face as another person. one of our patients was talking to his mirror image as if it was his nephew. His surprised spouse opened the door of the cupboard to which the mirror was fixed. When the mirror disappeared the nephew also disappeared. The patient accused family members of having murdered the nephew, resulting in serious legal problems.

We set out the following study objectives (i) to clinically evaluate if problems in mirror image processing exist in MCD; (ii) to elaborate the nature of these deficits, their association with apraxias, agnosias, and the MCD sub-type and (iii) lastly to identify its neural substrates using multi-modal structural and functional MRI brain imaging.


 » Materials and Methods Top


Subjects

The study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained from all participants/caregivers. Patients identified as MCD according to DSM-5, aged between 30-80 years were evaluated from February 2015 to May 2017. Non-degenerative causes of dementia, other neurological or psychiatric illness were excluded. Demographic data, detailed history, and clinical examination were carried out with specific examinations for apraxia, agnosia. Specifically, visual object agnosia and prosopagnosia, mirror agnosia and mirror image agnosia, and ability to recognize reflected faces of others. Hindi Mental Status Examination (HMSE),[11] Clinical Dementia Rating Scale,[12] hematological workup, Vitamin B12, Thyroid functions, HIV, VDRL, LFT, RFT, and any specific risk factor assessment in individual basis was done.

Assessments

Bedside Tests for reflected image processing: A 45 cm × 45 cm mirror was used. Before testing, we checked for visual acuity (corrected with glasses), ability of patient to identify and name a mirror and describe its purpose. Patient was seated comfortably on a chair and the mirror was placed in front of him/her on a table at a distance of 30 cm.

  1. Testing for mirror agnosia- The examiner held a common object like a pen which was previously identified by the patient, just behind and above his right shoulder ensuring that the object is reflected in the mirror. The patient was asked to recognize the object reflected in the mirror. If the patient was able to recognize the reflected object, he was asked to take the real object and use it. His reaction to the command was recorded. [Figure 1]a
  2. Testing for mirror image agnosia- The patient was asked to recognize their own reflected faces. Their reaction to the command was recorded, along with their ability to recognize reflected images of others, dress, and ornaments. [Figure 1]b [Videos 1 and 2].
Figure 1: Demonstration of the bedside Tests for reflected image processing: (a) Mirror Agnosia – patient is able to recognize the reflected image in the examiner's hand but is unable to localize it and searches for it behind the mirror and )b) Mirror Image Agnosia - patient is unable to recognize her own reflected image and talks to the image

Click here to view


The neuropsychological tests were adapted from the NIMHANS Neuropsychological Battery[13] and included N back test (Working memory), Digit Vigilance test (Attention), Animal names test (Category fluency), Complex figure Test – Copy trials (Visuospatial constructional ability) and Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) (Verbal learning and memory).

MRI Brain acquisition and analyses: MRI data were acquired on a Siemens Skyra 3.0 Tesla scanner with the following sequences:

  1. T1-weighted 3D-MPRAGE (magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo) imaging performed with TR/TE/TI = 1900/2.43/900 ms, FOV = 240OVOV3/92 yielding 192 sagittal slices and a 1 mm isotropic voxel size.
  2. The resting-state functional MRI was acquired using a BOLD gradient-echo Echo-Planar Images (EPI) image acquisition with a TR/TE = 2000/30 ms, 7878 TR/TE = 2000/30quisitionoblique slices with a voxel size of 3.0 acquired u3 and a matrix of 64 × 64 mm2. A total of ~ 10 min with 303 dynamic volumes were obtained in the resting-state where the participants were instructed to remain eyes closed, relaxed, and not move.
  3. The diffusion MRI sequence was a spin-echo EPI single shot (TR/TE: 8,500/59 ms, 65 transverse slices with 2 mm isotropic voxel to cover the entire brain with matrix size of 128e brain2). Diffusion sensitizing gradients were applied in 64 directions with b-values of 1300 s/mm2 along with 1 b0 scan.


Surface-based cortical reconstruction from the T1-weighted images were performed using the FreeSurfer Software Suite[14] that employs well-validated and fully automated procedures. The fMRI preprocessing and analyses were carried out using AFNI software.[15] The functional data were slice-time corrected, realigned to the mean-image, co-registered to T1w data using local-Pearson correlation function, and transformed to MNI template space using non-linear warp functions. A band-pass filter of 0.01-0.2 Hz was applied along with regression of motion parameters. The data was smoothed at 8 mm FWHM. For the Diffusion MRI data, the DIFFPREP module in TORTOISE V2.5.2[16] was used to compute distortion corrections for participant motion, eddy currents, and basic echo-planar imaging (EPI) distortions. This data was then exported to FSL (FMRIB Software Library, FMRIB, Oxford, UK) for tensor computation with weighted least squares approach and group comparisons using Tract Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS).[17] Of the 18 subjects, 11 underwent MRI. For MRI analysis, the subjects were binned into two groups, one with mirror agnosia alone (n = 6) and the other with mirror-image agnosia with or without mirror-agnosia (n = 5). Owing exploratory nature of these analyses and the limited sample size, all results are presented at P < 0.05 (uncorrected) unless specified otherwise.


 » Results Top


Demographic and clinical profile

18 patients were identified. Of them 61% were males. Mean age (SD) was 62.33e8.1 years and 56% of them were graduates. The MCD types included Alzheimer disease (AD) (44%), Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (22%), Corticobasal ganglionic degeneration (CBGD) (22%) and  Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease More Details (CJD) (11%). The mean duration of illness (SD) was 3.11 ± 1.39 years. The mean HMSE score (SD) was 14.83 ± 3.31 and mean CDR score (SD) 2.16 ± 0.61. The MCD was considered mild in 5% and severe in 95% using HMSE. With CDR global score, the MCD was qualified as mild in 11%, moderate in 61% and severe in 28%. During the bed-side test for reflected image processing, patients showed a special attraction and curiosity to go to mirror, misidentified self-image as God, stranger, nephew, mother and enemy soldier but identified the inanimate objects like ornaments correctly with furious fighting to get them back. Understandably, these symptoms cause serious problems to caregivers. (For a demonstration see supplementary video-1 for mirror agnosia and video-2 for mirror image agnosia.)

Mirror agnosia and Mirror image agnosia: 11 had mirror agnosia, 5 had mirror image agnosia and 2 had both. Among 11 patients with mirror agnosia: AD was seen in 8 cases, FTD in 1 case, CBGD in 1 case, and CJD in 1 case. For the 5 patients with mirror image agnosia, the conditions seen were FTD in 2 cases, CBGD in 2 cases and CJD in 1 case. Among the 2 patients that had both deficits, 1 had FTD and 1 had CBGD.

Association of mirror agnosia and mirror image agnosia with apraxias and other agnosias: Among the patients with mirror agnosia, 90% had apraxia while in patients with mirror image agnosia alone or both, apraxia was uncommon. Among the 5 patients with mirror image agnosia, 4 had prosopagnosia, 1 had visual object agnosia. Among the 2 patients with both, 1 had prosopagnosia. [[Table 1] summarizes the clinical profile].
Table 1: Clinical Profile

Click here to view


Neuropsychological assessment results

Fourteen patients were able to complete Neuropsychological evaluation. Compared to normative references, impairments were found in all domains tested. The groups had comparable impairments across all domains except in motor speed which was more impaired in patients with mirror image agnosia. [[Table 2] summarizes the neuropsychological profile].
Table 2: Neuropsychological Profile

Click here to view


MRI results

Structural MRI

On visual inspection, the pattern of atrophy on the T1w structural MRI was as follows: Parietotemporal 5 (28%), Frontotemporal 2 (11%), Diffuse 8 (44%), Parietal 2 (11%) and no atrophy in 1 (6%). On morphometric analysis, between-group differences were found in cortical thickness and surface area in both hemispheres at uncorrected P value < 0.05. The results indicate that MA group had thicker cortices but reduced surface area when compared to those with mirror image agnosia, at several brain regions involving frontoparietal areas as noted in [Table 3] and shown in [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b.
Table 3: Brain regions with greater cortical thickness and reduced surface area in patients with mirror Agnosia alone as compared to patients with mirror image Agnosia (alone or with mirror Agnosia)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Structural and functional Imaging Results: Between group differences for mirror agnosia group as compared to those with mirror image agnosia for (a) cortical thickness; (b) surface area; (c) seed-based functional connectivity of the left angular gyrus, above-threshold voxel clusters are shown with a black outline around them and (d) fractional anisotropy differences shown as Red-Yellow (greater) and Blue-LightBlue (reduced). The background image is the standard MNI template and the FA skeleton is shown in green

Click here to view


Seed-based Resting-state fMRI

Spheres of 5 mm radius placed at bilateral angular gyrus [MNI: x = ±54, y = -56, z = 31] were chosen as seed region of interest. The whole-brain connectivity of the right angular gyrus did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. Whereas, the left angular gyrus had increased functional connectivity with left anterior cingulate, left dorsolateral prefrontal and bilateral posterior cingulate cortex in patients with mirror agnosia group as compared to those with mirror image agnosia at P value < 0.05 and minimum 40 voxel extent (uncorrected). [Figure 2]

TBSS-based DTI results

Patients with mirror agnosia had significantly greater fractional anisotropy (FA) in the left superior longitudinal fasciculus and reduced FA in the right uncinate and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculi. [Figure 2]c and [Figure 2]d.


 » Discussion Top


We examined the clinical, neuropsychological and neuroimaging patterns of MCD patients who have deficits in reflected image processing. Alzheimer's disease was the most common diagnosis in patients with mirror agnosia while non-AD dementias (FTD, CBGD, and CJD) were seen in patients with mirror image agnosia or both. Majority of patients (90%) with mirror agnosia had apraxias, while apraxia was seen in only 40% patients with mirror image agnosia. Prosopagnosia and impaired recognition of reflected faces of others was seen exclusively in patients with mirror image agnosia or both. Visual object agnosia was seen in only one patient with mirror image agnosia. Our findings of association of apraxia with mirror agnosia and prosopagnosia with mirror image agnosia support the hypothesis that mirror image agnosia could be the ventral stream dysfunction and mirror agnosia due to dorsal stream dysfunction.

There was no significant statistical difference between the patients with mirror agnosia and mirror image agnosia among neuropsychological tests other than motor speed. Mirror agnosia does not correlate with severity of disease but affects activity of daily living, as they break mirrors and injure themselves. The patients with mirror agnosia may think that vehicles seen in the mirror are in front of them which can lead to accidents.

More than 50% of patients with mirror agnosia had parietal atrophy. Diffuse atrophy was common in patients with mirror image agnosia and those with both phenomena. This was reflected in surface-based morphometric analysis results indicating that mirror agnosia group had thicker bilateral frontoparietal regions but reduced surface area in left inferior parietal and supramarginal regions when compared to mirror image agnosia group, in contrast to the loss of right parietal volume in patients with strokes.[7],[8],[9] These differences could reflect a subtler and widespread neurodegenerative process seen in MCD compared to localized brain pathology in strokes. There was differential loss in surface area and cortical thickness which represent two biologically distinct brain processes. Greater right frontoparietal cortical thickness may offer some advantage for the mirror-agnosia group as self-recognition[18] and object identification[19] are both correlated with right hemispheric activity. Results suggest that bilateral frontoparietal differences play an important role in mirror agnosia, whereas mirror image agnosia could have more diffuse underlying processes.

There were differences in large-scale functional and structural brain connectivity. The left angular gyrus (AG) showed increased connectivity with anterior cingulate (salience network), dorsolateral prefrontal (executive network) and posterior cingulate cortex (default mode network) in patients with mirror agnosia alone as compared to those with mirror image agnosia. These results could indicate either a hypo-connectivity of left AG with other crucial brain network regions in mirror-image agnosia group or a compensatory hyper-connectivity of left AG in mirror agnosia group. Whether such compensatory increased connectivity could be due to disinhibition produced by disease activity in corresponding opposite regions or enhancement due to dysfunctional plasticity needs larger studies.[20],[21] The DTI results show that there are bi-hemispheric differences in the micro-structural integrity of the major white-matter pathways. The FA measure was found to be significantly greater in the superior longitudinal fasciculus on the left side and on the right side there was reduced FA in uncinate and inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus for patients with mirror agnosia which is consistent with functional connectivity findings of bi-hemispheric networks alterations. All three pathways that were found to be different are major association bundles that connect the frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal lobes. Given that there are bi-hemispheric alterations in structural and functional connectivity a possibility of these phenomena being a network disorder cannot be excluded. These data need further evaluation and could generate insight into the ways interactions of different brain regions lead to different clinical neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Lots of visuomotor transformations is needed to locate the reflections to its source and recognize the virtual and real differently. Menon et al.,[22] hypothesized that mirror agnosia is due to a dysfunction of the right parietal cortex. Binkofski et al.[8] related right tempero-parieto-occipital region to 'mirror agnosia'. Our study establishes that deficit in processing reflected images leading to mirror agnosia and mirror image agnosia can also occur in MCD. However, the phenomena do not appear to be disease specific as it is seen several types of dementia.

Limitations

The sample size was small as the phenomena is relatively rare. All patients were not amenable for complete work up. Control group of patients without mirror phenomena or healthy controls were not recruited.


 » Conclusion Top


This study provides comprehensive clinical, neuropsychological, and brain-imaging profile of mirror agnosia and mirror image agnosia phenomena in patients with MCD, whereas previously available literature is in patients with strokes, trauma and tumors. The results indicate that these deficits are likely to be domain specific and not disease specific. Neuroimaging results provide novel insights regarding the possibility of involvement of both specific regions and as well as large scale-networks in reflected image processing and its breakdown in disease states.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge with Gratitude our patients and care givers who Cooperated for this work, Our Director for all encouragements.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Dilks DD, Julian JB, Kubilius J, Spelke ES, Kanwisher N. Mirror-image sensitivity and invariance in object and scene processing pathways. J Neurosci 2011;31:11305-12.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gallup GG. Self recognition in primates: A comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. Am Psychologist 1977;32:329.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chandra SR, Issac TG. Neurodegeneration and mirror image agnosia. N Am J Med Sci 2014;6:472-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Chandra SR, Patwardhan K, Pai AR. Problems of face recognition in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Indian J Psychol Med 2017;39:653-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Schaflein E, Sattel H, Schmidt U, Sack M. The enemy in the mirror: Self-perception-induced stress results in dissociation of psychological and physiological responses in patients with dissociative disorder. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2018;9(Suppl 3):1472991.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Zhong H, Sze W, Hung Y. Reconstruction from plane mirror reflection. In 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06). IEEE, 2006.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL, Hillyer S. Mirror agnosia. Proc Biol Sci 1997;264:645-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Binkofski F, Buccino G, Dohle C, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ. Mirror agnosia and mirror ataxia constitute different parietal lobe disorders. Ann Neurol 1999;46:51-61.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Binkofski F, Butler A, Buccino G, Heide W, Fink G, Freund HJ, et al. Mirror apraxia affects the peripersonal mirror space. A combined lesion and cerebral activation study. Exp Brain Res 2003;153:210-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chandra SR, Issac TG. Mirror image agnosia. Indian J Psychol Med 2014;36:400-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Tsolaki M, Iakovidou V, Navrozidou H, Aminta M, Pantazi T, Kazis A. Hindi Mental State Examination (HMSE) as a screening test for illiterate demented patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15:662-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
O'Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, Hall J, Lacritz L, Massman PJ, et al. Staging dementia using clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes scores: A Texas Alzheimer's research consortium study. Arch Neurol 2008;65:1091-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Rao SL, Subbakrishna DK, Gopukumar K. NIMHANS. NIMHANS Neuropsychology Battery-2004 Manual. Bangalore: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences. 2004.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012;62:774-81.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Cox RW. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996;29:162-73.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Pierpaoli C, Walker L, Irfanoglu M, Barnett A, Basser P, Chang L, et al. TORTOISE: An integrated software package for processing of diffusion MRI data. In: ISMRM 18th annual meeting. Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487-505.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Keenan JP, McCutcheon B, Freund S, Gallup GG Jr, Sanders G, Pascual-Leone A. Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:1421-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
McAuliffe SP, Knowlton BJ. Hemispheric differences in object identification. Brain Cogn 2001;45:119-28.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
De Renzi E. Slowly progressive visual agnosia or apraxia without dementia. Cortex 1986;22:171-80.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Meyer JS, Huang J, Chowdhury MH. MRI confirms mild cognitive impairments prodromal for Alzheimer's, vascular and Parkinson-Lewy body dementias. J Neurol Sci 2007;257:97-104.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Menon BK, Shanbhogue K, Mutharasu C, Gopinathan S, Balasubramanian S, Chandramohan, et al. “Mirror agnosia” in a patient with right occipitotemporal infarct. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2006;9:233-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow