Leveron&Nexovas
briv
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 4075  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
    Similar in PUBMED
    Article in PDF (556 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed376    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1853-1854

Do Thresholds for Nociceptive Flexion Reflex and Subjective Pain Coincide?


Pain research and TMS Laboratory, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India

Date of Submission08-May-2019
Date of Decision14-Nov-2019
Date of Acceptance14-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication23-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Renu Bhatia
Department of Physiology, Lab Incharge: Pain research and TMS Laboratory, 6007, 6th Floor, Convergence Block, Ansari Nagar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.333483

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Nanda S, Arya S, Bhatia R. Do Thresholds for Nociceptive Flexion Reflex and Subjective Pain Coincide?. Neurol India 2021;69:1853-4

How to cite this URL:
Nanda S, Arya S, Bhatia R. Do Thresholds for Nociceptive Flexion Reflex and Subjective Pain Coincide?. Neurol India [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 28];69:1853-4. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2021/69/6/1853/333483




Dear Sir,

Nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) is an important neurophysiological measure adopted by clinics to assess pain and quantify the effect of an intervention. Classical literature shows that subjective pain experience (SP threshold) coincide with the NFR thresholds in healthy participants, while a disparity exists between the two in chronic pain conditions. Over the years, the observed association of the NFR threshold with SP has affirmed its status as an “objective marker of pain.”[1]

While performing some other planned experiments on pain perception, it was unexpectedly noticed that the NFR threshold did not correspond to the pain experienced by the healthy volunteers, calling for a formal investigation. NFR and SP thresholds were found to be significantly different (mean difference = 19 volts, effect size of difference = 0.6812, P < 0.01; number of participants = 31, number of females = 15, average age = 31.45 ± 8.23 years). NFR and SP thresholds coincided in only three of our subjects. All recordings were done according to the procedure previously described.[2]

The results suggest that the relationship between the NFR threshold and SP may not be as linear as previously reported.[1] A possible explanation of the results maybe because of the basic neurophysiological difference between NFR and SP. Our current belief is that SP is the result of higher-order processing taking place at the different levels of the central nervous system (CNS; cortical and subcortical), while NFR relies more on the nociceptive activation followed by a spinally mediated reflex response. From an anatomical standpoint, nociceptors sense and relay the noxiousness or saliency of the stimulus received, but they are not designed to faithfully transmit the entire repertoire of the pain experience. Therefore, even when the electrical stimulus is high enough to activate the nociceptors, it may or may not be processed or interpreted as a subjective painful sensation.[3] In line with our proposition, a recent set of the reports also portrays NFR as being reflective of wider physiological defence response.[4] Keeping this in mind, two pertinent questions arise. First, could investigation of factors that influence NFR also affect pain perception? Second, could NFR be used to report “resolution from painful state” after an intervention?.

That having been said, a note of caution is due here as robust literature still exists to support the usefulness of NFR in testing the integrity of the circuitry, current state of spinal-excitability, and changes occurring at the supraspinal levels of pain processing. To conclude, our observation raises intriguing questions regarding NFR and could serve as a primer to revisit its physiological interpretation and current applications.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge contributions of Suman Tanwar and Bhawna Mattoo for data interpretation and Sanjeev Kumar and Suman Pandey for technical support.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Willer JC. Comparative study of perceived pain and nociceptive flexion reflex in man. Pain 1977;3:69-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Tanwar S, Mattoo B, Kumar U, Bhatia R. Can aberrant spinal nociception be a marker of chronicity of pain in fibromylagia syndrome?. J Clin Neurophysiol 2019;65:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Willis Jr WD, Coggeshall RE. Sensory Mechanisms of the Spinal Cord: Volume 1 Primary Afferent Neurons and the Spinal Dorsal Horn. 3rd ed. New York, NY, US: Springer Science and Business Media; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wallwork SB, Grabherr L, O'Connell NE, Catley MJ, Moseley GL. Defensive reflexes in people with pain–A biomarker of the need to protect? A meta-analytical systematic review. Rev Neurosci 2017;28:381-96.  Back to cited text no. 4
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow