Leveron&Nexovas
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 12330  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (2,815 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusion
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed440    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 70  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 123-128

Double Anchoring Technique of Occipito-Cervical Fixation Using Innovative Occipital Plate: A Preliminary Study


1 Department of Neurosurgery, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission06-Dec-2021
Date of Decision13-Feb-2022
Date of Acceptance13-Mar-2022
Date of Web Publication11-Nov-2022

Correspondence Address:
Deepak K Singh
Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow - 226 010, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.360909

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


Background: Occipito-cervical fixation (OCF) provides immediate rigid fixation to cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ); however, in current practice, the optimal occipito-cervical fixation method is arguable.
Aim: The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of a newly designed inside-outside occipital (OC) plate system for the treatment of cranio-vertebral junction instability.
Material and Methods: Thirty-two patients of CVJ instability were treated using this new OC plate system. Safety and efficacy of this new OC plate was evaluated radiologically and clinically.
Results: Follow-up period ranged from 9 to 23 months. During the follow-up, no implant failure, recurrent subluxation, or newly developed instability at adjacent levels occurred, except in one patient in whom C2 screw pullout occurred due to trauma. All patients showed a satisfactory fusion at three months follow-up examination.
Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that this OC plate system is a simple, safe, and effective method for providing immediate internal rigid fixation of the CV junction. Long-term results are needed to determine the superiority of this OC plate over other methods of occipital fixation.


Keywords: AAD, basilar invagination, CV junction, inside-out, occipital plate, occipito-cervical fixation
Key Message: Inside out Occipital plate is a simple, safe and effective method for providing immediate internal rigid fixation.


How to cite this article:
Singh DK, Pathak VV, Singh N, Kaif M, Yadav K, Kumar R. Double Anchoring Technique of Occipito-Cervical Fixation Using Innovative Occipital Plate: A Preliminary Study. Neurol India 2022;70, Suppl S2:123-8

How to cite this URL:
Singh DK, Pathak VV, Singh N, Kaif M, Yadav K, Kumar R. Double Anchoring Technique of Occipito-Cervical Fixation Using Innovative Occipital Plate: A Preliminary Study. Neurol India [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 3];70, Suppl S2:123-8. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2022/70/8/123/360909




Occipito-cervical fixation (OCF) is an important surgical tool among other fixation methods for managing cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) instability. Over the last two decades, advances in instrumentation have changed methods of OCF from older wires, hooks or plate constructs to more rigid and efficient screw-plate and rod constructs.[1],[2] Superiority of currently used screw-plate-rod constructs have been demonstrated by many clinical trials.[3],[4],[5] But type of implant at occipital end of fixation in OCF is still a dilemma due to thin bone, irregular contour and poor bone purchase of occiput.[5],[8],[21],[22] Most studies in the past describe the occipital plate with typical outside-inside screw constructs in OCF with good fusion rates though it has 7%–15% implant failure rate.[6],[7] Very few studies described inside-outside occipital fixation technique with similar fusion rates.[2],[6],[7],[8],[9] Biomechanical strength and rigidity of inside-outside technique has proven to be better than conventional occipital screw constructs.[5],[8],[20] In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of newly designed occipital plate (OC) which incorporates both inside-outside and conventional occipital screw techniques in one implant (double anchoring technique), thereby improving biomechanical strength of construct and fusion rates.


 » Materials and Methods Top


It was a prospective observational study conducted in Dr. RMLIMS from January 2019 to January 2021. Thirty-two patients of cranio-vertebral junction anomalies (like AAD, BI, with or without Chiari malformation) requiring OCF were included in the study after their written and informed consent. All patients in this study had congenital CVJ anomalies with difficult anatomical factors like vertical C1-C2 joints, assimilated atlas, lateral mass/condylar hypoplasia or unfavorable vascular anatomy which precluded doing C1-C2 fixations, and hence needed OCF. Study is approved by Institutional ethics committee.

Patients were admitted and evaluated clinically, necessary radiological investigations were done, like MRI CVJ and CT CVJ with vertebral angiography along with other routine investigations. After pre-anesthetic checkup, patients underwent OCF with or without posterior decompression and newly designed OC was used in all of them for fixation, with screw-rod constructs and joint spacers used in a few cases.

Clinical outcome of patients was analyzed using mJOA score on admission and postoperatively at six months.[10],[11] Radiological outcome was evaluated with craniometrics indices like ADI (normal considered to be <3–5 mm) and evident correction of AAD and/or BI on CT CVJ after surgery; statistical analysis was done using paired t test to calculate P value. For evaluating bony fusion X-ray or CT CVJ was performed at three months in follow-up period.

Operative technique: Patients were operated under general anesthesia in prone position, and head supported on a horseshoe headrest. Intraoperative cervical traction using Crutchfield skull tong were done in all cases, which were irreducible on preoperative dynamic imaging. Midline vertical incision was given in suboccipital region and subperiosteal muscle dissection was done to achieve bony exposure from occipital bone to C3-C4 vertebrae as per desired lower level of fixation. Presence of high riding vertebral artery against the C1 lateral mass, vertical orientation of C1- C2 joint with overhanging occiput and hypoplastic C1 lateral mass enforced our decision to put occipital plate, instead of C1 lateral mass screws in all cases included in this study. Careful exploration of C1-C2 joints were done on both sides under microscope, taking account of regional vascular anatomy and joint surfaces were prepared with fine drill bit. We preferred to open and prepare C1-C2 joint for fusion in all cases as this provided the optimum site for bone graft placement. We did not cut C2 root ganglion on either side in cases where OCF was planned. C2 root ganglion division may lead to sensory impairment over the occiput, causing occipital scalp sore and occipital plate exposure. Surgical steps and technique was same as with other typical OCF methods apart from occipital end of fixation in which newly designed OC used. Lower end of fixation included standard C2 pedicle, pars or translaminar screws and in a few cases, C3 or lower cervical lateral mass screws were also included in construct as was thought appropriate. In a few cases with sever BI C1-C2 Goel's titanium joint spacers[12] are used along with OC-screw rod construct for fixation. We preferred to remove the assimilated C1 posterior arch in all cases. Standard foramen magnum decompression with C1 posterior arch removal and duraplasty was performed in four cases associated with Chiari malformations.

Occipital plate fixation: The basic design of this new (titanium alloy) OC consists of two components: first, the central inside-outside screw of 1.5 mm thickness and 12 mm diameter flat head, with its washer and bolt [Figure 1]a, and second, the occipital plate which fits over central screw having three small holes for outside-inside conventional screws [Figure 1]b, [Figure 1]c and lateral most two large holes which holds inbuilt screw heads onto which the rod can be fitted [Figure 1]d. Flat head inside-outside screws were made in 10 mm and 12 mm sizes with appropriate washer sizes for use in pediatric patients [Figure 1]e.
Figure 1: Parts of newly designed occipital plate; (a) central inside-outside screw with its washer and bolt; (b) occipital plate; (c) conventional outside-inside occipital screws; (d) inbuilt screw heads for rod fitting; (e) implant with parts organized

Click here to view


Steps: 1. After adequate suboccipital region bony exposure, marking for central and lateral screws were made with high-speed drill holding OC in desired position, as shown in [Figure 2]a, such that the central inside-outside screw was in midline where thickness of occiput was maximum. This provided better rigidity to construct by virtue of thickness of occiput.
Figure 2: Operative steps for occipital plate fixation; (a) marking of screw points; (b-d) creating burr hole and bony trough with placement of inside-outside screw; (e) fitting of occipital plate over central screw; (f) photo showing final picture of fixed implant with double anchoring technique

Click here to view


2. A burr hole was made with standard 14-mm perforator at the marked point and a thin trough was drilled at 12 o' clock position of burr hole which was advanced to the point of central screw mark, [Figure 2]b.

3. Central screw was placed in epidural space under occipital bone which was passed from burr hole, through the bone trough and up to the desired location [Figure 2]c and [Figure 2]d. Placement of this central inside-outside screw was done directly under vision (without the need of fluoroscopic guidance) so complications like venous sinus injury, dural tear, CSF leak or cerebellar injury was completely avoided.

4. Afterwards, specially designed OC was placed over central inside-outside screw onto which appropriately sized washer and bolt were to be fixed later on [Figure 2]e. To counteract rotational forces that may compromise stability of construct, this OC also incorporated three conventional outside-inside occipital screws around central screw. Hand drill (2.8–3.5 mm) with guard was used to make appropriate depth holes and measured screws (3.5–5.0 mm thick and 6–10 mm length) were inserted in conventional outside to inside technique. We preferred unicortical purchase of screws in cases with short posterior fossa to avoid injury of venous sinuses with this OC as these conventional screws are only for additional strength of the construct.

5. After tightening conventional screws, central inside-outside screw was fixed with washer and bolt. The washer placement covered conventional occipital screws partially, providing locking mechanism to the screws. With this double anchoring technique, the occipital bone was sandwiched firmly between flat screw head from the inside and washer-bolt from the outside which provided enhanced immediate biomechanical strength and rigidity to the construct. After final tightening, projected extra length of central screw was cut using a rod cutter and removed [Figure 2]f.

6. Lateral most part of this OC harbored two inbuilt fixed screw heads with slot for rods on either side which could be rotated 360 degrees for technical ease and fine adjustments, and could thereby be used in all types of fixation variations (C2 pedicle/pars/translaminar screws or cervical lateral mass screws) [Figure 3].
Figure 3: 3D reconstructed post-op image of OCF; (a) posterior view showing occipital plate with rods; (b) anterior inside view showing flathead of central inside-outside screw; (c) fluoroscopic image of O-C2 pedicle-C1-C2 joint spacers fixation showing inside-outside and conventional screws

Click here to view


Lower end screws of construct, that is. -C2 pedicle, pars, translaminar with or without lower cervical C3, C4 etc., lateral mass screws were inserted under fluoroscopic guidance by conventional methods. C1-C2 joint spacers were used in few cases when associated with severe BI to achieve reduction. Appropriately bent rod was placed in slots of screw heads and inni was tightened over it in the desired position of the head (extension) so that reduction of AAD and or BI was achieved.[23],[24],[25]

Adequate posterior decompression with FMD and duraplasty was done in four cases associated with Chiari malformation. Autologous bone graft mixed with bone granules were placed around the implant and in C1-C2 joint space for fusion followed by drained closure of incision. If desired reduction of AAD or BI was not attained even after OCF, then anterior transoral decompression was performed in the second stage, which was needed in only two cases.

Patients received postop analgesics and antibiotics for five days and were discharged according to recovery. They were followed up for clinical improvement, complications and fusion over variable period from 9 to 23 months. Patients were advised neck orthoses (hard collar/Philadelphia collar) for 12 weeks postoperatively.


 » Results Top


This study included 32 patients (19 men and 13 women) with mean age of 37.8 years. The follow-up period of the study was 9–23 months (mean 18 months). According to frequency of occurrence shown in [Table 1], neck pain, restricted neck movement, and motor symptoms were the most common clinical presentations.
Table 1: Clinical presentation of patients

Click here to view


All patients in our study had congenital CVJ anomalies with AAD and most of them, that is 87% (28/32), had irreducible type AAD. Associated BI was present in 65.6% cases (21/32) and Chiari malformation with syringomyelia in 21% cases (7/32). Most patients in our study had difficult bony anatomy like assimilated atlas, vertical C1-C2 joints, C1 lateral mass or condylar hypoplasia, with assimilated atlas being the commonest anomaly in 93% of cases (30/32).

Types of constructs used for OCF are mentioned in [Table 2]. Newly designed OC was used for occipital end of fixation in all cases and lower end fixations included O-C2 construct in most 81% (26/32) cases (i.e., O-C2 pedicles in 16, O-C2 translaminar in 7 and O-C2 pars in 3 cases). Lower cervical (C3-C4) lateral mass screws were also included in construct in five cases and O-C1-C2 construct was used in one case. C1-C2 joint spacers were used in OCF constructs additionally in 5/32 cases to get desired correction of BI. We didn't encounter any incidence of dural or venous sinus injury while putting the inside-out screw in occipital plate.
Table 2: Types of constructs used for OCF

Click here to view


Symptomatic improvement in form of pain relief, reduced spasticity and/or decreased paresthesia was observed in 96% of patients (31/32). Clinical outcome analysis showed statistically significant improvement in mJOA score of patients with P value of 0.002. Radiological outcome as measured by ADI showed significant reduction of mean ADI from 8.19 mm to 2.24 mm after surgery. Satisfactory correction of AAD (ADI < 3–5 mm) and or BI achieved in 94% cases (30/32) and anterior transoral decompression required in only two cases [Table 3].
Table 3: Clinical and radiological outcome analysis

Click here to view


Postoperative course of all patients was uneventful with no major neurological or vascular complications. One patient had wound infection that was managed conservatively and one had postoperative CSF leak as duraplasty was done (Chiari malformation) which was managed with lumbar drainage. Overall complication rate in our study was 6.2% (2/32). One patient met with an accident four weeks after surgery, had translaminar screw pullout and re-operated. On follow-up flexion-extension X-ray or CT scan, solid bony fusion was noted in 31 patients with overall fusion rate of 97%. One patient developed cranial settling after eight months and required re-operation. Implant failure or screw pullout of new occipital plate was not observed in any case in our study. Theoretical risk of EDH, CSF leak or cerebellar compression by epidural placed implant was not observed in any case.

Illustrative case: A 60-year-old male patient presented with spastic quadriparesis. CT CVJ showed AAD and BI with assimilation of atlas and unfavorable vertebral artery anatomy. Double anchoring OCF in the form of occiput-C2 pedicle screw-rod fixation with C1-C2 joint spacer placement and posterior bony decompression was performed. Satisfactory correction of AAD and BI was evident on post-operative CT [Figure 4] and patient showed symptomatic improvement during follow-up period with solid fusion across the C1-C2 joint at three months follow-up CT scan [Figure 4]f.
Figure 4: Illustrative case of OCF; (a) preoperative mid-sagittal CT showing AAD with BI; (b) preop MRI showing cervico-medullary compression with syrinx; (c) vertebral angiography with both arteries coursing over joint; (d and e) postoperative mid-sagittal and coronal images respectively showing correction of AAD and BI; (f) Coronal CT image at three-month follow up showing bony fusion across the C1-C2 joint

Click here to view



 » Discussion Top


Nearly 4/5th of studies in literature on OCF described conventional outside-inside occipital screw-rod technique which is easy and less time consuming.[2],[6],[12] Due to factors like thin bone, irregular surface, unicortical screws, occipital plate fixation in OCF is associated with complications like screw pullout and implant failure in about 5%–15% of cases.[13],[14],[15] Few studies mentioned bicortical screws which showed increased complications of CSF leak and dural or cerebellar injuries.[7] Very few studies are available on the inside-outside occipital screw technique (first described by Pait TG), despite having better biomechanical strength and fusion rates, which might be due to the relative complexity of procedure.[4],[5],[27],[28],[29]

In our study with new OC, both the above techniques were integrated in a single implant to provide superior biomechanical strength to the construct. We compared the pullout strength of the inside-out occipital plate with conventional occipital plate on universal testing machine (UTES-40) using porous ceramic board. When we evaluated the strength of the fixation (pullout strength), the load at peak of the inside-out construct was greater (1.6 KN at 9.00 mm rod displacement) than that of the conventional occipital construct (1.220 KN at 4.20 mm rod displacement). We also found significant differences in the failure load (1.2 KN/mm2 vs 0.37 KN/mm2) and stiffness, showing superiority of inside-out occipital plate over conventional occipital plate [Figure 5]. Stress testing at lateral bending, axial rotation and flexion-extension maneuvers could not be done.
Figure 5: Comparing pullout strength testing on universal testing machine (UTES-40); Pullout strength (maximum load at peak) was significantly more for occipital plate with inside-out screw at 1.6 KN/9 mm displacement (a) than for conventional occipital plate (1.220 KN at 4.2 mm rod displacement)(b)

Click here to view


Almost all inside-outside OCF techniques described in the past used bilateral occipital plates which engaged thin lateral occipital squama with poor hold, thereby having more higher of implant failure. As the occipital plate was fixed on both sides it was more time consuming and a complex procedure.[4],[5],[8],[9],[26] These disadvantages are neutralized in this new OC which holds the central thickest part of the occipital bone for purchase, and being a single midline implant, it is less time consuming. As inside-outside screw is placed in epidural space under direct vision, chances of any venous sinus injury, dural tear, and cerebellar injury are very low and we didn't encounter any such complication in our study.

To augment the fixation and avoid any rotational micro movements of the construct, this implant was held in place with additional three conventional occipital screws. Bicortical purchase of occipital screws as described in many studies was associated with dural tear or CSF leak in a significant number of cases (4%–6%).[13],[14],[15] In our technique, these conventional screws were inserted with unicortical purchase and chances of dural tear, CSF leak were not present. Occipital screws in our implant had a locking mechanism which further reduced any chances of screw pullout.

96% of the patients in our study showed symptomatic improvement and ADI showed statistically significant reduction with satisfactory correction AAD and/or BI achieved in 94% (30/32) cases. Clinico-radiological outcome in our study was comparable to other studies in the past.[9],[13],[16],[17]

Meta-analysis of past studies showed fusion rates in OCF of about 86%–96% and overall higher (5%–15%) rate of occipital implant failure.[15],[17],[18],[19] We observed 97% fusion rate in our study without any case of occipital (plate or screw) implant failure over completion of nine months follow-up period for all cases. Only one case of implant failure noted was due to neck injury, that too at the C2 translaminar screw site. Overall, the complication rate of 6% in our study is comparable to other studies in past.


 » Conclusion Top


This new OC provides advantages of both inside-outside and conventional outside-inside techniques in a single implant. Unicortical purchase of conventional occipital screws can be done to avoid chances of venous sinus injury, dural tear, or CSF leak, especially in pediatric patients. Locking mechanism of washer over occipital screws further reduces chances of screw pullout and implant failure. Double anchoring technique of occipital fixation using new occipital plate implant is a safe, easy and an effective method for OCF. Since, it is a preliminary study, larger biomechanical comparative studies are needed to prove its superiority over other techniques of occipital fixation.

Abbreviations

AAD: atlantoaxial dislocation

BI: basilar invagination

CVJ: craniovertebral junction

CSF: cerebrospinal fluid

CT: computed tomography

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging

OCF: occipito-cervical fixation

OC: occipital plate

FMD: foramen magnum decompression

mJOA: modified Japanese orthopedic association score.

Limitations

It is a preliminary study, further comparative studies with other techniques needed.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Abumi K, Takada T, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M. Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1425-34.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Grob D, Crisco JJ 3rd, Panjabi MM, Wang P, Dvorak J. Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:480-90.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Brattström H. Surgery in atlanto-axial dislocation in rheumatoid arthritis. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 1981;18:16-29.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pait TG, aI-Mefty O, Boop AF, Arnautovic KI, Rahman S, Ceola W. Inside–outside technique for posterior occipitocervical spine instrumentation and stabilization: Preliminary results. J Neurosurg (Spine) 1999;90 (1 Suppl):1–7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Caglar YS, Torun F, Pait TG, Hogue W, Bozkurt M, Ozgen S. Biomechanical comparison of inside-outside screws, cables, and regular screws, using a sawbone model. Neurosurg Rev 2005;28:53–8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lu DC, Roeser AC, Mummaneni VP, Mummaneni PV. Nuances of occipitocervical fixation. Neurosurgery 2010;66:141-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hwang SW, Gressot LV, Chern JJ, Relyea K, Jea A. Complications of occipital screw placement for occipitocervical fusion in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012;9:586-93.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Caglar S, Turkoglu E, Kertmen H, Gurer B, Bozkurt H, Ozay R, et al. Modified inside-outside occipito-cervical plate system: Preliminary results. Asian J Neurosurg 2019;14:148-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Sandhu FA, Pait TG, Benzel E, Henderson FC. Occipitocervical fusion for rheumatoid arthritis using the inside-outside stabilization technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:414-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Azimi P, Shahzadi S, Benzel EC, Montazari A. Updated measuring motor, sensory and sphincter dysfunctions in patients with cervical myelopathy using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score: A validation study. J Inj Violence Res 2012;4:41.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1651–8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Goel A, Shah A. Atlantoaxial joint distraction as a treatment for basilar invagination: A report of an experience with 11 cases. Neurol India 2008;56:144-50.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Bhatia R, Desouza RM, Bull J, Casey AT. Rigid occipitocervical fixation: Indications, outcomes, and complications in the modern era. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;18:333-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Martinez-Del-Campo E, Turner JD, Kalb S, Rangel-Castilla L, Perez-Orribo L, Soriano-Baron H, et al. Occipitocervical fixation: A single surgeon's experience with 120 patients. Neurosurgery 2016;79:549-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Macki M, Hamilton T, Pawloski J, Chang V. Occipital fixation techniques and complications. J Spine Surg 2020;6:145-55.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Vale FL, Oliver M, Cahill DW. Rigid occipitocervical fusion. J Neurosurg 1999;91:144–50.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lee SC, Chen JF, Lee ST. Complications of fixation to the occiput-anatomical and design implications. Br J Neurosurg 2004;18:590-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Stock GH, Vaccaro AR, Brown AK, Anderson PA. Contemporary posterior occipital fixation. Instr Course Lect 2007;56:319-28.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cohen LL, Yang BW, Glotzbecker MP, Emans JB, Karlin LI, Snyder BD, et al. Occipital plate fixation in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Orthop 2020;40:462-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Choudhary KS, Doddamani RS, Devarajan LJ, Agrawal M, Sawarkar D, Meena RK, Varma S, Kumar A, Singh P, Chandra PS, Kale SS. Feasibility of Double Anterior Odontoid Screw: A CT-Based Morphometric Analysis of the Axis in Adult Indian Population. Neurol India 2020;68:1361-1366.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
21.
Borkar SA, Sharma R. Biomechanical Factors Influencing Fixation Angle in Occipitocervical Fusion. Neurol India 2021;69:780-781.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
22.
Chandra PS, Ghonia R, Singh S, Garg K. Anomalous Vertebral Artery During Cranio Vertebral Junction Surgery Using DCER (Distraction, Compression, Extension, and Reduction): Approach. and Its Repair. Neurol India 2021;69:315-317.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Khandelwal A, Sokhal S, Dube SK, Goyal K, Singh A, Tandon V, et al. Perioperative Management of a Patient with Chin-On-Chest Deformity Presenting for Reconstructive Spine Surgery. Neurol India 2021;69:1756-1758.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
24.
Singh AK, Sheikh AI, Pandey TK, Chabbra DK. Congenital Mobile Atlantoaxial Dislocation with Cervicomedullary Astrocytoma in Pediatric Patient. Neurol India 2021;69:194-197.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
25.
Martinez-Perez R, Ganau M, Rayo N, Alemany VS, Boese CK, Moscote-Salazar LR. Prognostic Value of Age and Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cervical Subaxial Spinal Cord Injuries. Neurol India 2020;68:1345-1350.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
26.
Sharma H, Treiber JM, Bauer DF. Chiari 1 and Hydrocephalus - A Review. Neurol India 2021;69(Supplement):S362-S366.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Goel A, Dandpat S, Shah A, Bhambere S, Darji H. Atlantoaxial and Subaxial Cervical Spinal Instability in Two Cases with Neurofibromatosis-Type 1. Neurol India 2021;69:1763-1766.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
28.
Zhu C, Huang S, Song Y, Liu H, Liu L, Yang X, Zhou C, Hu B, Chen H. Surgical Treatment of Scoliosis-Associated with Syringomyelia: The Role of Syrinx Size. Neurol India 2020;68:299-304.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
29.
Blount JP, Maleknia P, Hopson BD, Rocque BG, Oakes WJ. Hydrocephalus in Spina Bifida. Neurol India 2021;69(Supplement):S367-S371.  Back to cited text no. 29
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow