Leveron&Nexovas
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 11459  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (2,232 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 » Material and Methods
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusion
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed286    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 70  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 135-143

O-Arm Assisted Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation in Type II and Rostral Type III Odontoid Fractures: Single Center Surgical Series of 50 Patients


Department of Neurosurgery, JPN Apex Trauma Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission04-May-2020
Date of Decision14-May-2020
Date of Acceptance15-May-2020
Date of Web Publication11-Nov-2022

Correspondence Address:
Pankaj Kumar Singh
Additional Professor of Neurosurgery, Room No 717, CN Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.360924

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


Background: Accuracy of screw placement is one of the important factors necessary for adequate union in odontoid fractures with malposition rates as high as 27.2% with standard techniques.
Objective: To evaluate efficacy of intraoperative O-arm assistance in improving accuracy of anterior odontoid screw placement and clinco-radiological outcome in type II and III odontoid fractures.
Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, surgery consisted of anterior odontoid screw fixation under intraoperative O-arm assistance over 5 years. Demographical, clinical, radiological, operative details and postoperative events were retrieved from hospital database and evaluated for fusion and surgical outcome.
Results: 50 patients (Mean age 34.6 years, SD 14.10, range: 7–70 years; 44 males and 6 females) with Type II and Type III odontoid fracture underwent O-arm assisted anterior screw placement. The mean interval between injury and surgery was 12 days (range 1–65 days). Mean operating time was 132.2 min ± SD 33.56 with average blood loss of 93 ml. ±SD 61.46. With our technique, accurate screw placement was achieved in 100% patients. At the mean follow-up of 26.4 month (SD13.75), overall acceptable fusion rate was 97.8% with non-union in 2.2% patients. Morbidity occurred in two patients; one patient developed fixation failure while other patient had nonunion which was managed with posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis. We had surgical mortality in one patient due to SAH. So overall our procedure was successful in 94% patients and among patients whose follow-up was available, acceptable fusion rates of 97.8% were achieved.
Conclusion: We conclude that use of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging using O-arm for anterior odontoid screw fixation improves accuracy and leads to improved radiological and clinical outcomes. It further enables us to extend the indications of odontoid screw fixation to selected complex Type II and rostral Type III odontoid fractures.


Keywords: Anterior screw fixation, fusion, O-arm, odontoid fracture, trauma
Key Message: O-arm is valuable tool in accurate placement of odontoid screw resulting in anatomical correction as well as excellent outcome and extending indications to technically difficult odontoid fractures like Type IIA and rostral type III fractures.


How to cite this article:
Sawarkar DP, Singh PK, Agrawal D, Satyarthee GD, Gupta DK, Tandon V, Gurjar HK, Borkar S, Jagdevan A, Mishra S, Kedia S, Sharma R, Doddamani R, Verma S, Meena R, Kumar R, Chandra P S, Kale SS. O-Arm Assisted Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation in Type II and Rostral Type III Odontoid Fractures: Single Center Surgical Series of 50 Patients. Neurol India 2022;70, Suppl S2:135-43

How to cite this URL:
Sawarkar DP, Singh PK, Agrawal D, Satyarthee GD, Gupta DK, Tandon V, Gurjar HK, Borkar S, Jagdevan A, Mishra S, Kedia S, Sharma R, Doddamani R, Verma S, Meena R, Kumar R, Chandra P S, Kale SS. O-Arm Assisted Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation in Type II and Rostral Type III Odontoid Fractures: Single Center Surgical Series of 50 Patients. Neurol India [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 3];70, Suppl S2:135-43. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2022/70/8/135/360924




Odontoid fractures comprise 9–15% of all cervical spine fractures.[1] Clinical presentation is variable from on-sight death to having only neck pain or neurological deficit.[1],[2] Classification given by Anderson and D'Alonzo[3] is the most accepted one. Type II and rostral type III fractures are potentially unstable. Important problems associated with management of these fractures are the risk of nonunion and delayed development of myelopathy.[4],[5],[53]

Surgical intervention gives instant fixation and helps in early mobilization of patients. Moreover, many authors have reported better fusion rates with surgical fixation than conservative management.[6],[7] Anterior approach with odontoid screw (OS) fixation is recommended as procedure of choice if fracture anatomy is suitable and transverse ligament is intact and it is associated with fusion rate of 80–100% in various series.[2],[8],[9],[10],[11],[5s4] Anterior OS fixation allows anatomical correction with preservation of C1-C2 motion however; this is a challenging procedure.[2]

Several authors have reported the use of navigation with virtual fluoroscopy and Isocentric C-arm three-dimensional (Iso-C 3D) fluoroscopy to increase the precision of anterior odontoid screw placement.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[55] Recent introduction of O-arm (Medtronic®, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) allow the intraoperative real time assessment of C1-C2 anatomy with intraoperative scan, have better image quality and also allows multi-planar 2D imaging with ease.[17],[18] Moreover, the image quality of the O-arm system is quite superior and is based on the use of distortion-free flat panel technology. Its 30 cm × 40 cm flat panel detector with 3 Mega-pixels provides a high dynamic range for greater image accuracy.

In this study, we have evaluated the precision with which anterior odontoid screw can be placed with help of intraoperative O-arm and ultimately the outcome for anterior odontoid screw fixation in acute odontoid fractures at our institution (level one trauma center).


 » Material and Methods Top


With our technique of anterior OS fixation under assistance of O-arm intraoperative imaging system (Medtronic®, Inc, Minneapolis, MN), we have treated 50 patients with odontoid fractures from 15 April 2010 to 15th September 2015. This was a retrospective study, patient's hospital records were reviewed for demographic profile, risk factors, injury characteristics (type, displacement etc.), neurological status, interval between injury and surgery, surgical details, clinical and radiographic outcome, morbidity and mortality.

Pre-operative evaluation was done with X-ray, CT scan and MRI to get complete details of fracture anatomy. Transverse ligament disruption was absolute contraindication for anterior odontoid screw fixation and integrity of the same was confirmed with pre-operative MRI in all these patients.

Surgical technique

Patient was positioned in supine position on Allen's table (Allen Medical Systems, A Hill-Rom Company, MA) after careful intubation using fiber-optic assistance. Gardner-Wells skull traction tongs were applied in all patients in slight extension to achieve the reduction. We prefer to keep head on table with traction rather than Mayfield head holder as this allows us to subsequently manipulate the head during surgery. O-arm (Medtronic®, Inc, Minneapolis, MN), intraoperative imaging system along with its workstation (Stealth Station) was then brought in place and base line 2D image was taken to check the status of fracture alignment. Proper alignment of fracture segments is prerequisite for the anterior OS fixation. Subsequently patient was prepped and draped along with draping of O-arm with sterile O-arm cover making whole operative field sterile. This motorized O-arm System and its user-friendly controls support quick and easy handling and a smooth workflow. Its gantry rotate by 360° around the patient and it is comfortable to do multi-planar imaging and intraoperative scan in reasonably rapid time without compromising the sterility of operating field. Though O-arm additionally enables one to perform navigated surgery using its navigation system (Medtronic, StealthStation), we did not feel the need of it as it requires rigid head fixation on Mayfield head holder limiting any further head manipulation intraoperatively. Moreover, we were concerned as there is potential danger with navigation with fixed head, as shift of fracture segment may not get detected. Also patient will need additional preoperative 3D scan for navigation.

Standard surgical procedure was used in all patients. Trajectory of screw was planned on lateral X-ray and then right horizontal or vertical skin incision was given at appropriate level (generally C5/C6). Platysma was divided and undermined to allow comfortable retraction. Then pre-vertebral fascia is reached through avascular plane between trachea and esophagus medially and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle and carotid sheath structures laterally. Pre-vertebral fascia was then opened in midline at C2-C3 junction and self-retaining Caspar retractor was used after this stage. To achieve optimum trajectory for screw placement, small anterior and superior part of C3 vertebral body in midline was drilled which will help in maintaining midline trajectory and related part of C2-C3 disc was removed for entry point at base of C2 body and slightly posterior to the anterior margin of inferior endplate of C2 to have better screw hold [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3].
Figure 1: Anterior odontoid screw fixation using O-arm (case 1). (a) Placement of patient on Allen's table under O-arm (b) Drilling of odontoid with K wire using pneumatic drill (c) Tapping around well placed K wire for screw placement (d) Placement of cannulated lag screw over K wire

Click here to view
Figure 2: Anterior odontoid screw fixation in type II odontoid fracture (case 1). (a) Planning trajectory with K wire using 2D O-arm images (b) K wire placement across fracture (c) Confirmation of K wire with intraoperative 3D Imaging (d) Successful screw placement over K wire (e) CT showing fusion at 3 month

Click here to view
Figure 3: Anterior odontoid screw fixation in type II fracture (case 2). (a) CT scan showing non-displaced type II odontoid fracture (b) Sagittal MRI showing normal spinal cord (c) Axial MRI showing intact transverse ligament (d) Confirmation of accurate K wire placement using O-arm based intraoperative imaging (e) Lateral view x ray showing well placed anterior odontoid screw (f) Sagittal CT scan at 6 month showing healed fracture with well-placed screw (g) Coronal cut of CT scan at 6 month showing healed fracture

Click here to view


Trajectory of screw placement was then confirmed with Kirschner (K) wire over guide using AP and lateral 2D X-ray image. Using drill, K wire was placed across fracture segment toward tip of dense making it bi-cortical under AP and lateral O-arm images. In case of any doubt, final position of K wire was then confirmed by doing intraoperative scan using O-arm. After acquisition, images were then transferred to workstation where 3 D reconstruction of images was performed to analyze the adequacy of its placement in all planes (sagittal, coronal, and axial). This time window allows the subsequent re-adjustment of K wire before placement of final odontoid screw. [Figure 2]c After achieving the proper placement of K wire, single, partially threaded, cannulated lag screw (4 mm) of appropriate length was placed over it achieving lag effect. [Figure 2]d Accuracy of screw placement was then verified with either 2D X-ray or if necessary second intra-operative CT scan if there is doubt about screw position. There after adequate hemostasis is achieved and wound is closed in layers.

Postoperative care

We preferred to immobilize the neck in Philadelphia cervical hard collar for period of 12 weeks.

Follow up

On follow-up CT scan was performed at 3 month and “bony fusion” was confirmed if we found bony trabeculations crossing the fracture site and absence of sclerotic borders adjacent to the fracture site. In doubtful cases dynamic X-ray imaging was performed to confirm the absence of motion on flexion/extension views. In patients where there was no satisfactory fusion, imaging were repeated after 3 months intervals and declared as “non-union” if no fusion occurred even after 9 month. Also, if patient had loss of reduction due to screw cut-through requiring posterior fixation within 30 days after operation, it was labeled as “failure of fixation”.


 » Results Top


Since the installment O-arm at our center in 2010, 50 patients (Age- mean 34.6 years, SD 14.10; Range 7–70 years) underwent anterior OS fixation using O-arm for intraoperative imaging and image acquisition. Most of the patients were male (male 44; female 6) and common causes were motor vehicle accidents (66%) and fall (30%). Median waiting period before surgery was 10 days (mean 12.28, SD- 12.85, range 1–65 days). Demography of patient is given in [Table 1]. Most of these patients had type II fractures (Type II-42; Type IIA-3; Type III-5). Details of fracture and clinical finding are given in [Table 2].
Table 1: Demographic details of patients

Click here to view
Table 2: Details of fracture morphology and associated clinical finding

Click here to view


Most patients had no displacement (54%) or displacement less than 4 mm (36%) but five patients (10%) also had displacement more than 4 mm. All patients had reduction on traction before surgery. Solitary odontoid fracture was present in 38 patients (76%) while remaining 12 patients (24%) also had associated other spine fractures. 15 patients (30%) also had some neurological deficits which was categorized using ASIA Impairment scale (AIS). Perioperative and follow-up details are mentioned in [Table 3].
Table 3: Perioperative details and follow up

Click here to view


Radiological outcome, neurological outcome and complications

Radiological outcome

Accurate placement of screw was performed in all patients using O-arm resulting in 100% successful screw placement [Table 4]. One patient with high type, type III fracture had failure of fixation at 3rd postoperative day due to screw cut through even after successful screw placement [Figure 4]. Presence of small anterior fractured chip fragment resulting in poor bone purchase could be the reason for screw cut through. Eventually this patient underwent posterior fixation with Magerl's technique complimented by posterior C1-C2 sublaminar wiring resulting in good fusion at 3 month [Figure 5]. Therefore overall 48 patients (96%) had successful OS fixation barring two patients (one had failure of fixation requiring posterior salvage surgery and other one had procedure related mortality).
Table 4: Complications and outcome after anterior odontoid screw (OS) fixation

Click here to view
Figure 4: Anterior OS fixation in Type III odontoid fracture which later developed screw cut through. (a) Post traction X-ray showing well alienated fracture (b) CT scan showing well placed K wire across fracture segments. (c) Intraoperative imaging showing well placed odontoid screw

Click here to view
Figure 5: Magerl's fixation with C1-C2 sublaminar wiring after screw cut through. (a) CT showing Screw cut through (b) Mid sagittal CT image showing good fusion with sublaminar wire in place (c) Right parasagittal CT image and (d) Left parasagittal CT image showing well placed C1-C2 transarticular screws with evidence of bony fusion

Click here to view


Out of 48 patients (96%) who had successful OS fixation, follow-up records of 46 patients were available for assessing outcome (mean 26.4 months, range 6 month–54 month, SD 13.75). At 3 months follow-up, 43 patients (93.5%) had good bony union and 2 patients (4.3%) had”'fibrous union: as though there was no evidence of bony union, alignment was maintained on dynamic X-ray. These two patients were treated conservatively with Philadelphia cervical collar and showed delayed fusion. Remaining one patient (2.2%) had nonunion as there was no bony union and also there was secondary loss of reduction. This patient was successfully salvaged with posterior approach using Magerl's fixation complimented by C1-C2 sublaminar wiring and fusion with good results. Therefore overall acceptable fusion rates were 97.8% at their last follow up with nonunion of 2.2%.

In one patient, there was proximal migration of K wire during procedure resulting subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) revealed on postoperative CT head. [Figure 6] Due to poor clinical condition, this patient could not be evaluated further and died probably due to neurovascular injury. Another patient had K wire breakage during drilling but successfully managed by odontoid screw placement without any complication [Figure 7]. Therefore, finally OS fixation was successful in 94% patients (47 patients) with overall morbidity and mortality in our series was 4% (2/50) and 2% (1/50), respectively.
Figure 6: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) following anterior odontoid screw fixation. This patient had upward migration of K wire during anterior OS fixation resulting in SAH. (a) Lateral cervical radiograph showing K wire at base of C2 at the start of drilling in well reduced fracture after traction (b) Radiograph showing upward migration of K wire (c) Intraoperative O arm imaging showing well placed screw (d) Post-operative radiograph showing well placed odontoid screw (e) Post-operative CT head showing diffuse SAH with diffuse cerebral edema

Click here to view
Figure 7: Rare complication of K -wire breakage while drilling odontoid for screw placement. While odontoid drilling for placement of odontoid screw there was rare complication of K wire breakage. We could manage to place odontoid screw near braked K wire with good result. (a) Breakage of K wire during drilling in anterior odontoid screw fixation (b) Sagittal X ray and (c) AP X ray showing placement of screw with braked K wire in situ. (d) Follow up sagittal cut CT scan, (e) Axial CT scan and (f) reconstructed image showing bony fusion

Click here to view


Clinical outcome

Out of 50 patients, one patient deteriorated and had procedure related mortality (2%). On follow-up (n-46), successful preservation of cervical motion could be achieved in 97.8% patients who had successful OS fixation and also 14 patients who had neurological deficits, showed improvement in their neurological deficits.


 » Discussion Top


Odontoid fractures comprise 9–15% of all cervical spine fractures.[1] Important problem associated with management of these fractures is the risk of nonunion and delayed development of myelopathy especially in type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures.[4],[5]

Literature reveals increasing trend toward surgical fixation of odontoid fractures rather than conservative management as it provide better fusion rates, with acceptable complication rates and with early mobilization of the patients.[6],[7] Since its initial description by Nakashini (1980)[19] and Bohler (1982),[20] anterior approach with OS fixation is now procedure of choice if there is an intact transverse ligaments and good alignment of fracture segments can be achieved resulting in fusion rate of 80–100% in most of the series.[2],[8],[9],[10],[11] Additionally anterior OS fixation allows physiological correction with preservation of C1-C2 motion.[2],[10]

Technological advances in various factors like development of better retractor system, lag screws, and intraoperative imaging modality were instrumental in rising popularity of this fixation procedure.[12]

Though there is no doubt that union rate are far better with anterior odontoid fixation as compared to conservative management, still it has 0–20% of nonunion rate reported in various series but can be as high as 62% as reported by Omeis et al. (2009)[21] and hence revealing the scope for further improvement.[22] Regarding long-term outcome, Fountas et al.[23] reported 9.5% failure rate over 24 month follow-up period after anterior fixation.[13] Various factors either related to patient and fracture anatomy or procedure were implicated in etiology of nonunion. While patient related factors are difficult to control, procedure related issue especially of accuracy of screw placement could be controlled which ultimately increases the prospects of successful fusion.[14]

Misplacement of screw is often underreported and is one of the major factors determining the fusion after surgery. [Table 5] summarizes the nonunion rates, re-operation rates, and screw malposition rates in various series over last 15 years showing the scope for the improvement.[2],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[18],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],[42],[43],[44],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50] This table shows the variable reported rate of malposition of screw from 0% to as high as 27.2%.[2],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[18],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],[42],[43],[44],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50] Lee et al. (2004)[30] reported the misplacement of screw in 6% of the patients. Apfelbaum (2000)[27] reported the misplacement of screw in 4.5% of the patients, followed by Lee et al.[30] (6%) in 2004; Platzer et al.[11] (2.7%) in 2007; Osti et al.[39] (27.2%) in 2011; Rizvi et al.[2] (20%) in 2012 and steltzlen[47] (14.3%) in 2013.
Table 5: Review of literature of anterior odontoid screw fixation studies published in last 15 years showing nonunion rate, reoperation rate and screw malposition rate

Click here to view


Traditionally C-arm is used for OS fixation. Proper OS fixation ideally requires bi-planar imaging with either use of two C-arm or when it is not available, single C-arm which has to be adjusted repeatedly in AP and lateral view. But this exercise is very cumbersome, time consuming and it does not provide complete 3Dl real time pictures. Its image quality is also inferior to formal CT scan.[13],[15],[16]

Addressing this issue various techniques like use of Virtual fluoroscopy, Iso-C 3D fluoroscopy and cone beam intraoperative CT using O-arm with navigation have been developed in last decade to give real time 3D picture of fracture anatomy to allow accurate screw placement as well as decrease the radiation exposure.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18]

Chibbaro et al.[15] used virtual fluoroscopy for anterior OS fixation in 10 patients and recommended that anterior odontoid screw fixation using image guided surgery with virtual fluoroscopy using FluoroNav (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) is a safe, effective, less time consuming and a low X-ray exposure technique. Disadvantage of this procedure is that it don't provide the real time images and he cautioned regarding the shift of fracture segment during screw placement could lead to malposition of screw.[15]

Iso-C 3D fluoroscopy with navigation obviates the need of cumbersome biplanar imaging as well as reduces the radiation exposure has shown to enhance the safety and efficacy of screw placement in anterior and posterior spinal fixation. It was successfully applied for anterior odontoid screw placement by Summers et al. (2008, 9 patients),[12] Martirosyane et al. (2011, 26 patients),[13] Yang et al. (2011, 13 patients)[16] and Kantelhartdts et al. (2012, 6 patients).[14] Martirosyane et al.[13] and Yang et al.[16] compared their results with patients who underwent OS fixation under C arm and found that results are better with Iso-C 3D group though not statistically significant and is the preferred option when available. They recommended Iso-C 3D fluoroscopy as an important tool in increasing the safety of procedure especially in technically difficult cases.[12],[13],[14],[16]

Latest development in this aspect is the introduction of O-arm which has ability to acquire multiplanar 2D as well as intraoperative CT scan at ease and provides real time images with better image quality as compared to 3D fluoroscopy.[17],[18] O-arm along with attached workstation makes it possible to rapidly acquire the images and reconstruct its coronal, sagittal and axial views and plan the trajectory. Also preparation time is less for O-arm.[51] Use of O-arm is widely reported recently for posterior cervical and thoracolumbar fixation and shown to have increased the accuracy of screw placement as well as reduced complication rates.[17],[18],[51] However, only few authors have reported its use for anterior OS fixation and there is no standard protocol available regarding how to use it to have optimum benefit. Also, O-arm affords better image quality, allows fast reconstruction of 3D images, and is easy to use when compared to 3D C arm fluoroscopy devices.

Castro-Castro J.[18] recently reported five patients, who underwent anterior OS placement under O-arm guidance. They have performed initial baseline CT scan followed by navigation guided screw placement and status of final screw was then confirmed with second CT scan. They could achieve accurate screw placement in 100% patients using O-arm navigation system. Four out of five patient had good bony fusion and one had fibrous union, which was then treated with posterior fixation in their series.

Since installation of O-arm in our institute in 2010, we have published our series regarding its utility on various spinal procedures including posterior cervical fixation. In this series we have evaluated its use in anterior odontoid fracture surgery. In this series of 50 patients, we could precisely place the anterior odontoid screw in all the type II and type III fracture patients (100%). Verification of the position of K wire with intraoperative imaging with 3D reconstruction in coronal, sagittal, and axial plane before placement of final odontoid screw was important part of our technique whenever there is any doubt about trajectory and bone purchase. This gave us time window to adjust the screw trajectory, as repositioning of K wire is safe and not associated with bone loss as it may occur in repositioning of screw itself and ultimately increasing the prospects of success. Once the final trajectory was confirmed, bone around K wire is drilled and then cannulated screw is placed over K wire and final position is confirmed with 2D image. With this protocol using intraoperative imaging, purpose of precise placement of screw is successfully addressed.

In our series, major complications occurred in two patients. In one patient with type III fracture, developed failure of fixation due to screw cut through on 3rd postoperative day. This patient was subsequently treated with Magerl's posterior fixation complimented by C1-C2 sublaminar wire –iliac crest bone graft fusion. Patient showed good fusion at 3 month follow-up. In another patient, there was significant diffuse SAH in postoperative period resulting in patient death. Intra-operatively there was accidental proximal migration of K wire during K wire placement across fracture segments. This event probably caused the neurovascular injury, which we could not evaluate due to patients poor condition. Occurrence of vascular injury after anterior OS fixation is very rare and only few cases are reported in literature, which can either occurs acutely or remotely due to proximal screw migration.[52] This shows that one should be very careful during the K wire placement especially while achieving bicortical purchase and one should be very slow at that time to avoid this major complication. There was occurrence of K wire breakage during odontoid drilling in one patient. In this tricky case we could place another screw anteriorly using O arm based intraoperative image guidance with successful fusion at 3 month.

At mean follow up of 26.4 month (range 9–54 month) in 46 patients with OS fixation who were available for follow up, overall acceptable fusion rate was 97.8% with nonunion rate of 2.2%. One patient had secondary loss of reduction along with nonunion (2.2%) and was managed with Magerl's posterior fixation. This patient showed good fusion after salvage surgery but had compromised neck movements. This patient had only uni-cortical placement of odontoid screw and this could be reason for his nonunion. So overall 94% patients (47/50) had good outcome after odontoid screw fixation excluding 3 patients (one had fixation failure, one expired and one patient had nonunion) and acceptable fusion rate was 97.8% among those available for follow up.

We also compared our data with our previous cases of anterior odontoid fixation where we used C-arm. Procedural failure rates and union rates in cases done with C-arm and O arm were 4.6% and 95% to 2% and 97.8%, respectively. These results were also better when we compared it with many other published series with either C-arm or with 3D fluoroscopy [Table 5].[2],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[18],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],[42],[43],[44],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50]

Average time taken for our procedure was 135 min (45–220 min) which was higher in comparison with what was reported by Martirosyan et al. (83 min),[13] Yang et al. (91.5 min)[16] and Kantelhardt et al. (108 min)[14] as it was overall time of the procedure rather than surgical time. Since it was retrospective study we did not have the accurate surgical time and could not calculated the time required for setting the O-arm in these cases however, according to our experience its not more than that required while setting the C-arm as very user friendly and intraoperative image transfer and reconstruction is fast. Also with the experience and familiarity of OT personnel, its very easy to use but require little more space than C-arm.

Special circumstances: Type III fractures and anterior oblique type II fracture

This technological advancement also allowed us to surgically treat the technically difficult odontoid fracture patients having Type III fractures and anterior oblique Type II fracture.

Type III fracture

We could accurately place the odontoid screw in all the five patients (100%) with type III fracture confirmed by intraoperative imaging. It was successful in 4 patients (80%) while one patient developed fixation failure (20%). This patient had small additional anterior chip fracture and hence he developed screw cut through on 3rd postoperative day. The reason for screw failure was additional chip fracture resulting in bone loss with poor screw holding strength. This patient was managed with Magerl's posterior fixation with good bony fusion at three month. This implies that for successful anterior odontoid screw fixation in type III odontoid fracture cases require proper selection. This case again stressed the importance of availability of two large fracture segments to strongly hold the screw in place to avoid fixation failure.

Anterior oblique type II fracture

Type II fractures with anterior oblique fracture line are generally not recommended by many for anterior fixation due to difficulty in planning the trajectory with subsequent high nonunion rates.[27] Posterior fixation techniques in these patients again have morbidity of restricted neck motion. However, with O-arm assistance we could negotiate the accurate trajectory in selected three patients having less steep anterior oblique fracture with 100% fusion rate. But again proper preoperative planning and case selection is important here.

Potential disadvantage of using O-arm is its cost but beside odontoid fracture various spinal pathology can be safely and effectively dealt with as per recent literature and surely it's a very good adjunct to provide quality care in institutional establishment and we have explored its benefits in anterior odontoid screw fixation. Also its is very good tool for the novice surgeon giving better intraoperative information.

Our study has some limitations. First it is a retrospective study but considering large number of patients treated by this innovative technology, it will definitely enlighten us further regarding increasing the safety of fixation as well as adding more options in one's armamentarium to provide more advanced and more effective care in almost all cases of odontoid fractures including technically difficult type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures. Second one is that there is no control group for comparison hence we have to rely on historical controls. However besides good results, this study also highlights the probable grave complications that one should be careful about.

Following on from this study, further research on effective use of navigated O arm guided surgery and its comparison with C arm in prospective manner for set up time, operative time, overall safety including radiation exposure and accuracy of anterior odontoid surgery would be valuable.


 » Conclusion Top


We conclude that use of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging using O arm for anterior odontoid screw fixation adds precision as well as increases the success of surgical techniques by increasing accuracy of anterior odontoid screw placement. It enables us to further extend the indications of odontoid screw fixation to selected complex Type II and rostral Type III odontoid fractures and therefor allowing us to do the more physiological neck motion preserving surgery in these subsets of patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Hadley MN, Browner C, Sonntag VK. Axis fractures: A comprehensive review of management and treatment in 107 cases. Neurosurgery 1985;17:281-90.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rizvi SAM, Fredø HL, Lied B, Nakstad PH, Rønning P, Helseth E. Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: Surgery-related complications and long-term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97 patients. J Trauma 2012;72:682-90.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Anderson LD, D'Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:1663-74.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Moskovich R, Crockard HA. Myelopathy due to hypertrophic nonunion of the dens: Case report. J Trauma 1990;30:222-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Crockard HA, Heilman AE, Stevens JM. Progressive myelopathy secondary to odontoid fractures: Clinical, radiological, and surgical features. J Neurosurg 1993;78:579-86.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Smith HE, Vaccaro AR, Maltenfort M, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, et al. Trends in surgical management for type II odontoid fracture: 20 years of experience at a regional spinal cord injury center. Orthopedics 2008;31:650.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Nourbakhsh A, Shi R, Vannemreddy P, Nanda A. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute odontoid type II fractures: A meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:651-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ryken TC, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Hurlbert RJ, et al. Management of isolated fractures of the axis in adults. Neurosurgery 2013;72:132-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Aebi M, Etter C, Coscia M. Fractures of the odontoid process. Treatment with anterior screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:1065-70.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Oberkircher L, Bliemel C, Flossdorf F, Schwarting T, Ruchholtz S, Krüger A. Biomechanical evaluation of 2 insertion points for ventral screw fixation of C-2 dens fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;18:553-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Ostermann R, Wieland T, Vécsei V, Gaebler C. Anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures comparing younger and elderly patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1714-20.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Summers LE, Kouri JG, Yang M, Jacob RP. Odontoid screw placement using isocentric 3-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:45-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Martirosyan NL, Kalb S, Cavalcanti DD, Lochhead RA, Uschold TD, Loh A, et al. Comparative analysis of isocentric 3-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy and biplanar fluoroscopy for anterior screw fixation in odontoid fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013;26:189-193.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kantelhardt SR, Keric N, Giese A. Management of C2 fractures using Iso-C3D guidance: A single institution's experience. Acta Neurochir 2012;154:1781-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Chibbaro S, Benvenuti L, Carnesecchi S, Marsella M, Serino D, Gagliardi R. The use of virtual fluoroscopy in managing acute type II odontoid fracture withanterior single-screw fixation. A safe, effective, elegant and fast form of treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147:735-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yang YL, Fu BS, Li RW, Smith PN, Mu WD, Li LX, et al. Anterior single screw fixation of odontoid fracture with intraoperative Iso-C 3-dimensional imaging. Eur Spine J 2011;20:1899-907.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ailawadhi P, Agrawal D, Satyarthee GD, Gupta D, Sinha S, Mahapatra AK. Use of O-arm for spinal surgery in academic institution in India: Experience from JPN apex trauma centre. Neurol India 2011;59:590-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Castro-Castro J. Anterior odontoid screw fixation using intra-operative cone-beam computed tomography and navigation. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2014;25:261-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Nakanishi T. Internal fixation of the odontoid fracture. Cent Jpn J Orthop Trauma Surg 1980;23:399-406.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bohler J. [Screw-osteosynthesis of fractures of the dens axis (author's transl)]. Unfallheilkunde 1981;84:221-3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Omeis I, Duggal N, Rubano J, Cerabona F, Abrahams J, Fink M, et al. Surgical treatment of C2 fractures in the elderly: A multicenter retrospective analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;22:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Tian N-F, Hu X-Q, Wu L-J, Wu X-L, Wu Y-S, Zhang X-L, et al. Pooled analysis of non-union, re-operation, infection, and approach related complications after anterior odontoid screw fixation. PLoS One 2014;9:e103065.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Fountas KN, Machinis TG, Kapsalaki EZ, Dimopoulos VG, Feltes CH, Liipfert R, et al. Surgical treatment of acute type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures managed by anterior screw fixation. South Med J 2005;98:896-901.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ziai WC, Hurlbert RJ. A six year review of odontoid fractures: The emerging role of surgical intervention. Can J Neurol Sci 2000;27:297-301.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
ElSaghir H, Bohm H. Anderson type II fracture of the odontoid process: Results of anterior screw fixation. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:527-30; discussion 531.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Harrop JS, Przybylski GJ, Vaccaro AR, Yalamanchili K. Efficacy of anterior odontoid screw fixation in elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures. Neurosurg Focus 2000;8:e6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Apfelbaum RI, Lonser RR, Veres R, Casey A. Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures. J Neurosurg 2000;93:227-36.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Alfieri A. Single-screw fixation for acute type II odontoid fracture. J Neurosurg Sci 2001;45:15-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Borm W, Kast E, Richter HP, Mohr K. Anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures: Is there a difference in outcome between age groups? Neurosurgery 2003;52:1089-92; discussion 1092-4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Lee SC, Chen JF, Lee ST. Management of acute odontoid fractures with single anterior screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 2004;11:890-5.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Bhanot A, Sawhney G, Kaushal R, Aggarwal AK, Bahadur R. Management of odontoid fractures with anterior screw fixation. J Surg Orthop Adv 2006;15:38-42.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Moon MS, Moon JL, Sun DH, Moon Y-W. Treatment of dens fracture in adults: A report of thirty-two cases. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2006;63:108-12.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Chi Y-L, Wang X-Y, Xu H-Z, Lin Y, Huang Q-S, Mao F-M, Management of odontoid fractures with percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1157-64.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Song KJ, Lee KB, Kim KN. Treatment of odontoid fractures with single anterior screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:824-30.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Srinivasan U, Dhillon C, Mahesha K, Kumar PV. Anterior single lag screw fixation in type II Dens fracture—Indian experience. Indian J Neurotrauma 2008;5:87-91.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Collins I, Min WK. Anterior screw fixation of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. J Trauma 2008;65:1083-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Eap C, Barresi L, Ohl X, Saddiki R, Mensa C, Madi K, et al. Odontoid fractures anterior screw fixation: A continuous series of 36 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:748-52.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Mayer M, Zenner J, Auffarth A, Atzwanger J, Romeder F, Hitzl W, et al. Efficacy of anterior odontoid screw fixation in the elderly patient: A CT-based biometrical analysis of odontoid fractures. Eur Spine J 2011;20:1441-9.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Osti M, Philipp H, Meusburger B, Benedetto KP. Analysis of failure following anterior screw fixation of type II odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. Eur Spine J 2011;20:1915-920.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Comparison of percutaneous and open anterior screw fixation in the treatment of type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1459-63.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Hou Y, Yuan W, Wang X. Clinical evaluation of anterior screw fixation for elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:E75-81.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Kim SK, Shin JJ, Kim TH, Shin HS, Hwang YS, Park SK. Clinical outcomes of halo-vest immobilization and surgical fusion of odontoid fractures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011;50:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Henaux PL, Cueff F, Diabira S, Riffaud L, Hamlat A, Brassier G, et al. Anterior screw fixation of type IIB odontoid fractures in octogenarians. Eur Spine J 2012;21:335-9.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Konieczny MR, Gstrein A, Muller EJ. Treatment algorithm for dens fractures: Non-halo immobilization, anterior screw fixation, or posterior transarticular C1–C2 fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:e144 (1-6).  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Mashhadinezhad H, Samini F, Mashhadinezhad A, Birjandinejad A. Clinical results of surgical management in type II odontoid fracture: A preliminary report. Turk Neurosurg 2012;22:583-7.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Cho DC, Sung JK. Analysis of risk factors associated with fusion failure after anterior odontoid screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:30-4.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Steltzlen C, Lazennec J-Y, Catonné Y, Rousseau M-A. Unstable odontoid fracture: Surgical strategy in a 22-case series, and literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013;99:615-23.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Duransoy YK, Mete M, Zileli M, Selcuki M. A new guide tube for odontoid screw fixation for unstable odontoid fractures: Report of 6 case series. Tur Neurosurg 2013;23:639-44.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Zou D, Zhang K, Ren Y, Wu Y, Yang Y, Li Y. Three-dimensional image navigation system-assisted anterior cervical screw fixation for treatment of acute odontoid fracture. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:4332-6.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Sawarkar DP, Singh PK, Siddique SA, Agrawal D, Satyarthee GD, Gupta DK, et al. Surgical management of odontoid fractures at Level one trauma center: A single-center series of 142 cases. Neurol India 2015;63:40-8.  Back to cited text no. 50
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
51.
Singh PK, Garg K, Sawarkar D, Agarwal D, Satyarthee GD, Gupta D, et al. CT-Guided C2 pedicle screw placement for treatment of unstable hangman fractures. Spine 2014;39:E1058-65.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Wilson DA, Fusco DJ, Theodore N. Delayed subarachnoid hemorrhage following failed odontoid screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:715-8.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Choudhary KS, Doddamani RS, Devarajan LJ, Agrawal M, Sawarkar D, Meena RK, Varma S, Kumar A, Singh P, Chandra PS, Kale SS. Feasibility of Double Anterior Odontoid Screw: A CT-Based Morphometric Analysis of the Axis in Adult Indian Population. Neurol India 2020;68:1361-1366.  Back to cited text no. 53
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
54.
Chandra PS, Ghonia R, Singh S, Garg K. Anomalous Vertebral Artery During Cranio Vertebral Junction Surgery Using DCER (Distraction, Compression, Extension, and Reduction): Approach. and Its Repair. Neurol India 2021;69:315-317.  Back to cited text no. 54
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
55.
Singh AK, Sheikh AI, Pandey TK, Chabbra DK. Congenital Mobile Atlantoaxial Dislocation with Cervicomedullary Astrocytoma in Pediatric Patient. Neurol India 2021;69:194-197.  Back to cited text no. 55
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow