Neurol India Home 
 

NI FEATURE: CENTS (CONCEPTS, ERGONOMICS, NUANCES, THERBLIGS, SHORTCOMINGS) - ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 63  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 571--582

Endoscopic epilepsy surgery: Emergence of a new procedure

Sarat P Chandra1, Manjari Tripathi2,  
1 Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Sarat P Chandra
Room 7, 6th floor, CN Center, AIIMS, New Delhi - 110 029
India

Abstract

Background: The use of minimally invasive endoscopic surgery is fast emerging in many subspecialties of neurosurgery as an effective alternative to the open procedures. Objective: The author describe a novel technique of using an endoscope for performing a corpus callosotomy and hemispherotomy. A description of endoscopic disconnection for a hypothalamic hamartoma (HH) and a review of the literature is also presented. Materials and Methods: Thirty four patients underwent endoscopic procedures between January 2010 and March 2015. These included endoscopic-assisted inter-hemispheric trans-callosal hemispherotomy (EH; n = 11), endoscopic-assisted corpus callosotomy with anterior/posterior commissurotomy (CCWC; n = 16), and endoscopic disconnection for HH (n = 7). EH and CCWC were performed with the use of a small craniotomy (4 cm × 3 cm). The surgeries were performed using a rigid high-definition endoscope, bayonetted self-irrigating bipolar forceps, and other standard endoscopic instruments along with the guidance of intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation. HH disconnection was performed using endoscopic neuronavigation through a burr hole. Results: Hemispherotomy: Sequelae of middle cerebral artery infarct (5), Rasmussen«SQ»s syndrome (3), and hemimegalencephaly (3). Outcome: Class I Engel (9) and class II (2), mean follow-up of 8.4 months, range: 3-18 months. Mean blood loss: 85 cc, mean operating time: 210 min. CCWC: All had a diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), with etiologies of hypoxic insult (10), lissencephaly (2), bilateral band heterotropia (2), microgyria and pachygyria (2). Mean follow-up: 18 ± 4.7 (16-27 months). Drop attacks stopped in all the patients. Seizure frequency and duration decreased >90% (11) and >50% (5). HH: Type II (2), Type III (2), Type IV (3). 5 had IA outcome. Conclusion: The article emphasizes the role of endoscopic procedures for epilepsy surgery and provides a review of literature. This experience may subserve to coin the term «DQ»endoscopic epilepsy surgery«DQ» for a fast emerging subspeciality in the field of epilepsy surgery.



How to cite this article:
Chandra SP, Tripathi M. Endoscopic epilepsy surgery: Emergence of a new procedure.Neurol India 2015;63:571-582


How to cite this URL:
Chandra SP, Tripathi M. Endoscopic epilepsy surgery: Emergence of a new procedure. Neurol India [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Dec 6 ];63:571-582
Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2015/63/4/571/162056


Full Text

 Introduction



The use of endoscopy is now accepted in a number of neurosurgical procedures like pituitary surgery, skull base surgery, disc prolapse, etc. Endoscopic assistance is also a frequent accompaniment of many of the micro-neurosurgical procedures. Improved technology like the use of high definition cameras, three-dimensional visualization systems and better optics has further helped to amalgamate this tool into the neurosurgical armamentorium.

The use of an endoscope in epilepsy surgery is currently limited and not frequently practiced. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] This could be due to several reasons: (1) Most of the epilepsy surgeries are "parenchymal" surgeries not involving an empty space, ventricle or cistern; (2) most of the epilepsy surgeons, during their residency or fellowship, have either limited or no training in endoscopy; (3) most of the epilepsy surgeries utilize extensive brain mapping prior to surgical resection and hence, surgeons do not find any relevance of endoscopic intervention, especially for neocortical epilepsies.

The utilization of an endoscope for epilepsy surgery was initially used for disconnecting or resecting a hypothalamic hamartoma (HH). This was possible for Type II, III, and some of Type IV hamartomas as these lesions projected into the ventricle. In an earlier study, we, for the first time, described the use of an endoscope for performing a hemispherotomy using an inter-hemispheric trans-callosal approach. [9]

Before this publication, only a conceptual procedure had been reported in a small cadaveric study by Bahuleyan et al. [10] They described a 2-port endoscopic technique in order to perform a lateral hemispheric disconnection. However, this technique has not been clinically used till date. The possible reason could be that the technique involves a route through the brain parenchyma. While this technique may be possible in a patient with an "atrophic" (e.g., patients with epilepsy presenting as a post infarct sequel) brain, it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to conduct this procedure in patients with hemimegalencephaly where the ventricles will usually be slit-like. Following this, we described a minimally invasive endoscopic assisted procedure for performing a complete corpus callosotomy with commissurotomy (CCWC), for the first time in the literature (under publication). We had also earlier published our initial experience with the use of an endoscope for resecting HHs. [11] Utilizing this experience, this may be the appropriate time to coin, in this review article, the term "endoscopic epilepsy surgery" to indicate a new subspecialty of epilepsy surgery that is now emerging as an exciting field in its own right.

 Materials and Methods



Patient selection

All the patients subjected to surgery were diagnosed to be having "drug-resistant epilepsy" by the neurologist, that is, the patient should have failed at least 2 anti-epileptic medications given to him/her in an optimal dosage and combination. The duration of the waiting period, while the patients remained on anti-epileptic medication prior to surgical intervention, as recommended by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), [12],[13],[14],[15],[16] was usually 2 years. In some children, however, the waiting period was reduced significantly to even weeks to months depending on the severity of epilepsy, the underlying substrate, and the onset of epileptic encephalopathy. [1],[5],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23]

The preoperative investigations usually included a interictal electroencephalography (EEG), a video EEG (VEEG) recording at least 3 habitual seizures, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; at least 1.5T) using an epilepsy protocol with thin sections passing perpendicular to the hippocampus. Further investigations were required depending on the MRI findings. Most of the cases requiring a hemispherotomy and having a pathology like a post infarct sequel or hemimegalencephaly, do not require any further investigations. Patients with a disease like Rasmussen's syndrome usually benefited by the performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) scan as it often showed the areas of hyper-metabolism (this investigation was, however, optional). The presence of HHs also did not require any additional investigations. However, patients undergoing a corpus callosotomy required a detailed investigational work-up as this was a procedure performed in patients disabled with drop attacks with no localizing focus/networks. The patients undergoing a corpus callosotomy in our set up, therefore, further underwent a PET scan, an ictal subtracted single photon emission computed tomography, and a magnetoencephalography. It was also important to discuss these cases in an epilepsy surgery conference where the surgical strategy was planned out. In MRI negative cases (especially if the MRI was performed in another center or without a proper epilepsy protocol), a repeat MRI was always performed especially on a 3 Tesla (T) scanner. This is because it may often pick up subtle substrates like Type I cortical dysplasias. [11],[24] ,[2]5[,26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],33]

Assessment and surgical planning were performed in the epilepsy surgery conference. Patients without any definitive localization on all investigations [24],[25],[27],[28],[31] and having bi-hemispheric seizure activity were considered for CCWC. A detailed counseling and informed consent were taken as per the institute protocol for epilepsy surgery patients.

The inclusion criteria for an endoscopic hemispherotomy (EH) included: [9],[25],[34]

Pan-hemispheric pathology like Rasmussen's syndrome, hemimegalencephaly, and post infarct sequelConcordance of the MRI with the VEEG findingsPediatric age group (preferably below 9 years of age) except for post infarct sequel. It is important to remember that hemispherotomy is a procedure that is usually performed in the pediatric age group where a significant recovery due to neuronal plasticity may be expected. Adults may also often have the same degree of recoveryPresence of hemiparesis. Although this fact does not always hold true, the presence of hemiparesis does seem to suggest that there is significant dysfunction of the affected hemisphere, and that the opposite healthy hemisphere is likely to have taken up the functions of the contralateral side. Motor recovery usually occurs within a period of 6 months but the pincer grip usually does not improve. We have seen that further worsening may be precipitated, especially when the motor power is fully well-preserved. However, in cases where there is hemiparesis, especially in patients with epilepsy presenting as post infarct sequel, further weakness usually does not occur.

The inclusion criteria for a CCWC included:

No single lateralization/localization of the epileptiform zone/networkDrop attacks as the predominant seizure typeIntelligence/social quotient <50High seizure frequency defined as at least 1-2/dayParental consent for the procedure.

In general, we preferred performing CCWC in cases with a severe Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) with severe to profound mental retardation especially in the pediatric population. For HHs, the Delande's grading was used to choose our patients for surgery. [35],[36] The endoscopic approach was preferred for a small hamartoma that was situated either on the floor or on the wall of the ventricle (Type II); or, a hamartoma on the floor projecting inferiorly (Type III). For a Type IV hamartoma, we preferred an endoscopic-assisted trans-callosal approach.

Surgical procedures

Endoscopic inter-hemispheric trans-callosal hemispherotomy

The patient is placed in a supine position with the head slightly flexed and in a neutral position. A transverse skin incision is marked over the coronal suture, and a 4 cm × 3 cm flap is raised just lateral to the midline with the medial border just over the lateral part of the sagittal sinus. The sagittal sinus is just exposed by 1-2 mm. Neuronavigation is utilized in all the cases to mark the exact position of the bone flap and to avoid a major vein draining the region. Mannitol infusion is started just prior to the skin incision to provide a lax brain. The craniotomy is performed using a high-speed drill. The dura is opened in a C-shaped manner with the base over the sinus. The medial margin of the hemisphere is retracted using a brain retractor. A rigid 0° high-definition pituitary endoscope (Karl Storz) is then brought in, and rest of the surgery is carried out under its visualization [Figure 1]. The author prefers to hold the endoscope with the left hand as a free hand tool. The endoscope may also be supported by the assistant or held with a holding device. A self-irrigating bayonetted bipolar was used with the right hand. This technique serves to facilitate both dissection as well as haemostasis. The irrigation from the bipolar forceps aids in the general irrigation as well. The medial part of the hemisphere is dissected from the falx under endoscopic guidance, and the corpus callosum (CC) is exposed.{Figure 1}

The entire surgery was carried out in 3 basic steps [Figure 2]: (1) Complete corpus callosotomy; (2) anterior and middle disconnection; and, (3) posterior disconnection.{Figure 2}

First, a corpus callosotomy is performed. This is performed by exposing the CC by gently retracting the hemisphere by a few centimeters [Figure 2]a-e. It is important to ensure using the endoscope that no bridging veins are getting stretched due to the retraction, both in front and behind the craniotomy. Next, using a fine dissector and also micro-scissors, the hemisphere is separated from the falx. The CC may be identified at the depth as it appears white and pale when compared to rest of the cortex [Figure 2]. We prefer to expose the CC first from the anterior to the posterior aspect and then start the disconnection in postero-anterior direction [Figure 2]b and c. It is important to realize that corpus callosotomy performed for a hemispherotomy is different from that performed as a stand-alone procedure. In the former, the surgeon has to ensure that he/she opens the CC until the body of the ventricle on the affected side is reached, as this procedure will allow him/her to perform further hemispheric disconnection. On the other hand, in stand-alone corpus callosotomy, the surgeon should ensure that he/she is in perfect midline so that the cavum may be opened. Once the CC is exposed, the corpus callosotomy is performed with the aid of bipolar forceps and micro-scissors. The posterior part including the splenium is divided first, followed by the genu up to the anterior commissure. Compared to the microsurgical approach, we have discovered that the endoscopic-assisted approach provides better visualization. This advantage is particularly evident while dividing the terminal part of the splenium.{Figure 3}

Following a complete corpus callosotomy, the anterior and middle disconnection was carried out. The anterior and middle disconnection, starts at the beginning of the genu of the CC and passes on to the floor of the anterior skull base at the level of the lesser wing of the sphenoid and the planum, first remaining anterior to the head of the caudate nucleus, then curving lateral to it and passing posteriorly, where it joins the body of the lateral ventricle to the temporal horn and then terminates at the atrium, just lateral to the thalamus. The anterior disconnection starts at the genu. Disconnection is carried from the surface until the anterior skull base over the planum is reached. Neuronavigation is used to reach this bony landmark. Once reached, the resection is carried out to the posterior part of the gyrus rectus, similar to that done in the standard vertical hemispherotomy approach. At this stage, the anterior cerebral arteries (ACAs) and the distal part of the optic nerve may be visualized through the arachnoid. The disconnection next proceeds laterally from just anterior to the caudate head to the lateral part of the lesser wing of the sphenoid, and then turns posteriorly to reach the sphenoid ridge. The middle cerebral artery (MCA) was visualized at the level of the sphenoid ridge. The anterior disconnection is completed at the level of the MCA thereby disconnecting the frontal lobe. The middle disconnection is started at the sphenoid ridge. The disconnection next continues posteriorly. The bulk of the basal nuclei lie here. The middle disconnection is completed by dividing the hemisphere lateral to the thalamus and the choroidal fissure, till the atrium is reached. Division is carried out at the level of the atrium both superiorly and posteriorly until it is completed, and the temporal horn is connected with the body of the lateral ventricle. This procedure disconnects the amygdala, hippocampus, and anterior temporal connections.

The posterior disconnection [Figure 2]i involves division of a short segment of tissue consisting of the posterior part of the fornix, which mostly lies between the choroid plexus at the atrium and the posterior-most part of the splenium. The division was performed up to the underlying arachnoid. Caution must be exercised, as the Galenic veins lie just underneath. There is usually a small piece of tissue present under the choroid plexus that may be easily missed. The endoscope is particularly useful in visualizing and dividing this portion. The posterior division completes the disconnection of rest of the temporal lobe.

The postoperative MRI also provides the surgeon with feedback regarding the feasibility of the surgical procedure using the endoscope [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. We have used an intra-operative MRI in all these cases. We do agree that this is an expensive tool. However, if it is not available, a neuronavigation is mandatory. In addition, reaching proper anatomical landmarks will ensure that the disconnection is complete.{Figure 4}

Following the surgery, the dura is closed primarily. An intra-ventricular drain is left inside for the next 24-48 h to drain out the blood stained cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The drain is removed earlier if the CSF clears completely, or is delayed up to 72 h, if the CSF remains blood stained.

Endoscope-assisted corpus callosotomy with commissurotomy

The craniotomy and dural opening are as described for EH. The inter-hemispheric fissure is accessed, and the cisternal CSF is released to make the brain lax [Figure 5]. The hemisphere is retracted to one side, and the CC was reached. The ACAs are separated. First, the CC is exposed from the anterior to posterior end. Following this, the disconnection is started from the splenial part and then is extended anteriorly. Division of the splenial part is performed till the arachnoidal sleeve containing the internal cerebral veins is visualized. Once the CC is sectioned completely, the septae on either side of the cavum are separated. The anterior commissure is then divided. This was followed by division of the posterior commissure after entering the third ventricle through its roof [Figure 5]. All our patients were placed on elective ventilation for at least 24 h after surgery. The patients underwent routine evaluations on surgical rounds for any possible complications. A thorough neurological evaluation was performed for persistent neurological deficits before discharge.{Figure 5}

Hypothalamic hamartoma

Endoscopic surgery for a HH should be carefully planned. [19],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],[42],[43],[44],[45] The use of neuronavigation is mandatory as the ventricles are usually small. The use of rod lens obturator scopes is also useful to access the ventricles [Figure 6]. The approach is such that the line of disconnection is along the axis of the trajectory. A burr hole is made usually at the level of the coronal suture. The exact position is again planned using neuronavigation so that any draining veins can be avoided. The dura is opened widely and cauterized to avoid stripping and causing a possible epidural hematoma. The obturator with the sheath is introduced into the ventricle. Once the lateral ventricle is accessed, a 4 mm diagnostic scope is introduced. The scope is advanced into the third ventricle. The direction of approach cannot be overemphasized. For example, if the hamartoma is arising from the floor and the left lateral wall, the direction of the approach is from the right side. The hamartoma is visualized as a bulge on the floor and lateral wall of the ventricles. The margins of the lesion are again confirmed using neuronavigation by moving the scope inferiorly and laterally. Next, a depth electrode is introduced into the hamartoma, and an EEG recording is performed. A hamartoma is quite active electrically and will produce multiple polyspikes (grade 5). [28] Following this, a biopsy is taken. If the hamartoma is small, it is removed using a biopsy forceps. The tissue is initially held, rotated to avulse it from the wall and then removed piecemeal. The lesion is usually avascular or very mildly vascular, hence there is usually no problem with hemostasis. In larger lesions, a disconnection from the surrounding area is also performed. The disconnection is usually performed laterally and anteriorly but not posteriorly as here the lesion merges with midbrain structures. [35],[40],[41],[43],[45]{Figure 6}

Outcome assessment

Seizure outcome was assessed using the Engel classification. [15] The postoperative neuropsychological assessment was performed as described earlier.

 Results



Thirty four patients (from January 2010-March 2015) underwent endoscopic procedures for epilepsy. These included endoscope-assisted inter-hemispheric trans-callosal hemispherotomy (EH), (n = 11), endoscope-assisted CCWC (n = 16), and endoscopic disconnection/excision for a HH (n = 7).

Endoscopic hemispherotomy group

Of the 11 patients, who underwent EH (8 males), 9 underwent a right sided procedure. The mean age of seizure onset was 1.52 ± 0.99 years (range 0.8-2.9 years). The mean age of surgery was 9.4 ± 6.1 years (range 0.4-18 years). The mean frequency of seizures was 17.25 ± 16.1/day, excluding 1 patient who presented with status epilepticus. The pathologies included post infarct epilepsy (5), Rasmussen's syndrome (3), and hemimegalencephaly (3).

Two patients had prolonged fever (1-2 weeks) after surgery. The CSF counts and cultures were negative. All the investigations for blood and urine were negative. Following 1 week of antibiotics, the fever was treated symptomatically with paracetamol and cold sponging. The mean blood loss was 85 ± 48.4 cc and mean operating time was 210 ± 42 min. None of the patients required any blood transfusions. The mean hospital stay was 8.5 days.

The follow-up ranged from 5 to 16 months with a mean of 8.4 ± 4.1 months. 9 patients had Class I Engel's outcome and 2 (with hemimegalencephaly) had Class II outcome. The mean Stanford-Binet Kamat Test score was 62 ± 12.64 before surgery and 64.25 ± 4.99 at follow-up (normal range 85-100). The improvement was not significant (P = 0.05).

Endoscopic corpus callosotomy with anterior and posterior commissurotomy group

Sixteen patients underwent CCWC. The mean age was 10 ± 5.9 years (range: 2-15 years; 6 males). Seizure onset occurred within 1 month after birth in 3 patients. In others, it ranged from birth to 5.5 years (mean 24.37 ± 34.76 months). The mean duration of epilepsy was 9.2 ± 5.2 years. The mean seizure frequency was 21.2 ± 17.3/day (range 1-45 days). Etiological causes included previous hypoxic insult in 10 patients (due to forceps delivery), meconium aspiration, hypoglycemia, and low birth weight with breech presentation. Changes in the type of seizures were encountered in 3 patients. A delayed development was seen in all patients. On admission, profound mental retardation with an intelligence quotient (IQ) less than 20 was encountered in 7 patients, severe mental retardation with an IQ between 20-34 was seen in 7 patients and moderate mental retardation with an IQ between 35-49 was seen in 2 patients.

The mean follow-up was 18 ± 4.7 months (range 16-27 months). There was complete improvement in drop attacks in all patients. A significant decrease (>90%) in seizure frequency was reported in 11 patients, moderate reduction (>50%) in 5 patients, while an increased seizure frequency was noted in one patient. The decrease in frequency was observed in all types of seizures in these patients including tonic, tonic-clonic, absence, and myoclonic seizures.

Aggression in their behavior for an initial period of 3 months was reported in 8 patients, which gradually reduced in 6-9 months in 3 patients. The mean preoperative IQ was 25.23 ± 10.71. This improved to a mean score of 26.43 ± 11.41 in 6 months and to 26.87 ± 11.95 in 1 year. Behavioural improvement, in particular, in the domains of social contact, attention span, and learning were reported in 6 patients.

Hypothalamic hamartoma group

Four patients underwent a pure endoscopic approach (Type II: 2; Type III: 2). Three patients underwent an endoscopic-assisted trans-callosal approach. The follow-up ranged from 9.2 ± 1.46 months (range 6-24 months). Five of them had Engel IA outcome, 1 had grade II outcome, and 1 had a poor outcome (Type III, patient with grade IV HH). Three patients showed improvement in learning and behavior. Schooling was started for them. Their rage and aggression showed a significant improvement. EEG recordings in various stages of follow-up showed variable normalization of background activities. One patient, who had precocious puberty, had significant improvement. His testosterone level normalized from a value of 711 ug/ml. He was, in addition, also given chemotherapy [Figure 6].

Postoperative follow-up

All the patients were continued on their respective anticonvulsants. A repeat MRI was scheduled after 3 months.

 Discussion



Endoscopic hemispherotomy

Hemispherotomy has an excellent outcome when it is performed with proper surgical indications. [46],[47],[48],[49],[50],[51],[52],[53] In the literature, the incidence of freedom from seizures as a result of the hemispheric resection and disconnective procedures is reported to vary from 54% to 89%. [35],[49],[53],[54],[55],[56],[57],[58],[59],[60],[61] Better success rates are seen when the insula is also disconnected. These procedures have been mainly been indicated in children having severe catastrophic epilepsy in the presence of either a congenital or an acquired hemispheric pathology. [35],[40],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50],[51],[52],[53],[58],[62],[63] When first introduced, hemispherectomy was associated with significant short and long term complications. Specially noteworthy was the occurrence of hemosiderosis, which occurs due to the presence of the dead space produced by removal of the entire hemisphere. [46],[64],[65] In 1983, Rasmussen introduced a functional hemispherectomy based on the partial excision of certain areas and disconnection of the major lobes. [64] This lead to the usage of the term "hemispherotomy" instead of "hemispherectomy," which was first suggested by Olivier Delalande in 1992. [55],[66] Further evolution lead to the development of two basic procedures. A vertical approach was suggested by Delalande [35],[53],[55] and a peri-insular approach was suggested by Villemure et al. [58],[59],[60],[67],[68] Most of the modifications are based on these two procedures. [25],[34],[57],[61],[69],[70],[71],[72],[73] Delande et al., felt that their technique was better as it involved a cortical pathway that avoided major blood vessels and was performed through a trajectory that included landmarks easily identifiable by surgeons. Overall, it is important to realize that a complete hemispheric and insular disconnection [54],[74] is required to achieve the best possible seizure outcome. Interestingly, when Delande et al. developed this procedure, they started an inter-hemispheric approach but gave it up to prefer a trans-cortical approach due to the issue of the bridging veins. [35] Development of neuronavigation has solved this problem. Thus, key hole-sized craniotomies may be effectively planned to avoid the bridging veins. If the surgeon does not have access to neuronavigation, we suggest that he/she should use the preoperative MRI to plan the site of craniotomy.

The authors present a novel pilot technique consisting of an endoscopic-assisted approach utilizing a small craniotomy (4 cm × 3 cm). The approach involves a route through the inter-hemispheric trans-callosal corridor to achieve a hemispheric disconnection. [9] Till date, there has been only one study of endoscopic-assisted hemispherotomy described in the literature, and this was a cadaveric concept study. [10] Our technique is the first of its kind to be described in the literature in terms of both concept and clinical application. However, a word of caution is that an endoscopic procedure should be initially performed using a larger bone flap. The initial cases should preferably be done on patients suffering from post- infarct sequel, and the surgeon should not shy away from using the microscope in combination with the endoscope.

Hemispherotomy can achieve excellent outcomes when performed in optimally indicated patients. [34],[48],[51],[52],[53],[55],[58],[60],[62],[63],[74],[75],[76],[77],[78],[79],[80],[81],[82],[83],[84],[85] Since the introduction of functional hemispherectomy by Rasmussen, its morbidity and mortality have steadily reduced. [34],[35],[53],[55],[57],[58],[75],[76],[77],[78],[79],[86] However, this procedure still cannot be considered as trivial surgery, as most of the surgeries are performed in children who cannot tolerate blood loss and are prone to other perioperative morbidities such as hypothermia, electrolyte disturbances, and other problems associated with operating on pediatric patients.

Following an examination of these issues, the existing literature, and also our own experience, [24],[34] we decided that the best option for EH would be an "endoscope-assisted surgery" utilizing the inter-hemispheric route through a small craniotomy.

An inter-hemispheric endoscope-assisted hemispherotomy has the advantage of providing a "cisternal to ventricular access." This is unlike the technique described by Delalande et al., [53],[55] which consists of a parenchymal-to-ventricular access. This is also in contrast to the concept described by Bahuleyan et al., [10] in which ventricular access would be difficult to obtain in the presence of small ventricles.

Endoscopic callosotomy

A drop attack is a postural seizure (mostly due to atonia) caused by a rapid generalization of epileptiform activity to contralateral hemisphere mostly through the CC (that is considered as the largest inter-hemispheric propagation pathway). Complete callosal sectioning is a very effective "palliative" procedure for breaking secondary bilateral synchrony and alleviating the drop attacks with more than 90% improvement in the drop attacks with a reasonable long-term remission. [87],[88],[89],[90],[91],[92] Most of these above-mentioned authors, however, report the presence of 10-20% of primary non responders; and, close to 30% of patients further relapse in the next few years with the outcome thereafter remaining stable. [91],[93] The common reasons cited for the failure of callosal sectioning in alleviating the drop attacks or their recurrence is the possibility of transmission of epileptiform activity through other inter-hemispheric pathways like the anterior, posterior, and habenular commissures. [93],[94],[95],[96] Adam [94] has demonstrated the role of the anterior commissure in inter-temporal lobe communication. Plausibly, these otherwise nonfunctional commissures attain propagating ability over time in the absence of CC and may continue the spread of epileptiform activity to the contralateral hemisphere causing a recurrence of drop attacks over a time course. Harbaugh et al. [97] in early eighties reported multiple forebrain commissurotomies including that of CC, anterior commissure, and posterior commissure, mainly for akinetic seizures and reported a good outcome in the magnitude of 80% with the procedure. Although we observed acute disconnection syndromes mostly manifesting as prolonged confusional states in kids and nondominant facio-brachial apraxia, it did not alter the functional status of our patients. While all our patients had severe to profound mental retardation with severe epilepsy, there was a definite improvement at follow-up in their cognitive functions. On the contrary, relief of disabling seizures was perceived as the biggest factor responsible for the postoperative improvement as perceived by the parents.

Our study is the first of its kind to demonstrate the utility and safety of this approach for CC and commissurotomy. We believe that a "key hole" endoscopic-assisted approach helps in minimizing unnecessary brain exposure and reduces the blood loss.

Neurological complications in all major series have an incidence of 2-5% with a permanent sequel in 5% of patients. [87],[88],[98] We did not encounter any motor deficits. However, postoperative akinetic state, apathy and sometimes aggression, buccal apraxia manifesting as drooling of saliva, and memory deficits were common. These resolved completely over a period of time.

Endoscopic approach to hamartoma

A gelastic seizure is the hallmark presentation of these tumors, which has now been proven to be originating in the hamartoma itself and spreads to the adjoining cingulate gyrus through the mammillothalamic tracts. Hence, attachments to mammillary bodies are essential for epileptogenesis in HH. We also demonstrated that depth electrode recordings from the hamartoma show continuous epileptiform discharges. This forms the anatomical and electrophysiological basis of disconnection surgery in HH, which actually aims at removing the epileptogenic lesion from the epileptic networks. [40],[41],[44],[45],[99],[100] In 1998, Delalande et al. [35] described this novel technique of simple disconnection of the hamartoma from the hypothalamus and reported complete seizure freedom in 3 of the five patients with more than 90% reduction in seizure burden in the other 2 patients. In 2003, Choi et al. [101] also described a good outcome of seizure reduction after successful endoscopic disconnection of a HH. This was also demonstrated in other studies. [11],[38],[44]

We believe that the trans-callosal approach gives a direct entry into the third ventricle and provides an unobstructed view of the disconnection line thereby decreasing the manipulation of hypothalamus and obviates any need for resection of the hamartoma. In addition, the use of endoscopic assistance further reduces the size of the craniotomy. In our study, we have used trans-callosal endoscopic assistance in Type IV; and, a pure endoscopic approach in Type II and III cases.

 Conclusions



In the current paper, the authors have described 2 novel techniques that utilize an endoscope for performing a hemispherotomy and corpus callosotomy. In addition, they have described for the first time, a combination of corpus callosotomy combined with commissurotomy for better control of seizures in patients with LGS with severe to profound mental retardation. They have also described their experience with the use of an endoscope for HHs. The utilization of the endoscope for all the three approaches has led to their coining the term "endoscopic epilepsy surgery" to denote the emergence of a new subspeciality of epilepsy surgery.

References

1Menon RN, Radhakrishnan K. A survey of epilepsy surgery in India. Seizure 2015;26:1-4.
2Rathore C, Radhakrishnan K. Concept of epilepsy surgery and presurgical evaluation. Epileptic Disord 2015;17:19-31.
3Shah R, Botre A, Udani V. Trends in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Indian J Pediatr 2015;82:277-85.
4Singh G, Chowdhary AK. Epilepsy surgery in context of neurocysticercosis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2014;17:S65-8.
5Santhosh NS, Sinha S, Satishchandra P. Epilepsy: Indian perspective. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2014;17:S3-11.
6Banerjee J, Chandra SP, Kurwale N, Tripathi M. Epileptogenic networks and drug-resistant epilepsy: Present and future perspectives of epilepsy research-Utility for the epileptologist and the epilepsy surgeon. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2014;17:S134-40.
7Radhakrishnan K. Presidential oration: The 18 Annual Conference of the Indian Academy of Neurology, Trichi, Tamil Nadu, September 24-26, 2010, Epilepsy care in developing countries. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2010;13:236-40.
8Tandon PN. Prof. B. Ramamurthi: Contributions to Indian neurosurgery (a personal tribute). Neurol India 2004;52:18-20.
9Chandra PS, Kurwale N, Garg A, Dwivedi R, Malviya SV, Tripathi M. Endoscopy-assisted interhemispheric transcallosal hemispherotomy: Preliminary description of a novel technique. Neurosurgery 2015;76:485-94.
10Bahuleyan B, Manjila S, Robinson S, Cohen AR. Minimally invasive endoscopic transventricular hemispherotomy for medically intractable epilepsy: A new approach and cadaveric demonstration. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010;6:536-40.
11Dagar A, Chandra PS, Chaudhary K, Avnish C, Bal CS, Gaikwad S, et al. Epilepsy surgery in a pediatric population: A retrospective study of 129 children from a tertiary care hospital in a developing country along with assessment of quality of life. Pediatr Neurosurg 2011;47:186-93.
12Duchowny MS. Surgery for intractable epilepsy: Issues and outcome. Pediatrics 1989;84:886-94.
13Duncan JS. Epilepsy surgery. Clin Med 2007;7:137-42.
14Dunkley C, Kung J, Scott RC, Nicolaides P, Neville B, Aylett SE, et al. Epilepsy surgery in children under 3 years. Epilepsy Res 2011;93:96-106.
15Engel J Jr. Concepts of epilepsy. Epilepsia 1995;36 Suppl 1:S23-9.
16Fang M, Xi ZQ, Wu Y, Wang XF. A new hypothesis of drug refractory epilepsy: Neural network hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 2011;76:871-6.
17Bhatia M, Singh VP, Jain S, Gaekwad S, Bal CS, Sarkar C, et al. Epilepsy surgery in India: All India Institute of Medical Sciences experience. J Assoc Physicians India 1999;47:492-5.
18Gadgil P, Udani V. Pediatric epilepsy: The Indian experience. J Pediatr Neurosci 2011;6:S126-9.
19Jayalakshmi S, Panigrahi M, Nanda SK, Vadapalli R. Surgery for childhood epilepsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2014;17:S69-79.
20Jayalakshmi S, Vooturi S, Vadapalli R, Somayajula S, Madigubba S, Panigrahi M. Outcome of surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy in adults-A cohort study. Int J Surg 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.006.
21Kar AM, Garg RK, Verma R. Refractory epilepsy: Diagnosis and management. J Indian Med Assoc 2002;100:290-2, 294.
22Rathore C, Rao MB, Radhakrishnan K. National epilepsy surgery program: Realistic goals and pragmatic solutions. Neurol India 2014;62:124-9.
23Wieser HG, Silfvenius H. Overview: Epilepsy surgery in developing countries. Epilepsia 2000;41 Suppl 4:S3-9.
24Chandra PS, Bal C, Garg A, Gaikwad S, Prasad K, Sharma BS, et al. Surgery for medically intractable epilepsy due to postinfectious etiologies. Epilepsia 2010;51:1097-100.
25Chandra PS, Tripathi M. Epilepsy surgery: Recommendations for India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2010;13:87-93.
26Chandra PS, Vaghania G, Bal CS, Tripathi M, Kuruwale N, Arora A, et al. Role of concordance between ictal-subtracted SPECT and PET in predicting long-term outcomes after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Res 2014;108:1782-9.
27Chandra SP, Bal CS, Jain S, Joshua SP, Gaikwad S, Garg A, et al. Intraoperative coregistration of magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and electrocorticographic data for neocortical lesional epilepsies may improve the localization of the epileptogenic focus: A pilot study. World Neurosurg 2014;82:110-7.
28Tripathi M, Garg A, Gaikwad S, Bal CS, Chitra S, Prasad K, et al. Intra-operative electrocorticography in lesional epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2010;89:133-41.
29Tripathi M, Jain DC, Devi MG, Jain S, Saxena V, Chandra PS, et al. Need for a national epilepsy control program. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012;15:89-93.
30Tripathi M, Padhy UP, Vibha D, Bhatia R, Padma Srivastava MV, Singh MB, et al. Predictors of refractory epilepsy in north India: A case-control study. Seizure 2011;20:779-83.
31Tripathi M, Singh MS, Padma MV, Gaikwad S, Bal CS, Tripathi M, et al. Surgical outcome of cortical dysplasias presenting with chronic intractable epilepsy: A 10-year experience. Neurol India 2008;56:138-43.
32Tripathi M, Singh PK, Vibha D, Choudhary N, Garg A, Bal CS, et al. Electrophysiological characteristics of seizure clusters. Clin EEG Neurosci 2010;41:143-6.
33Tripathi M, Vibha D, Choudhary N, Prasad K, Srivastava MV, Bhatia R, et al. Management of refractory status epilepticus at a tertiary care centre in a developing country. Seizure 2010;19:109-11.
34Chandra PS, Padma VM, Shailesh G, Chandreshekar B, Sarkar C, Tripathi M. Hemispherotomy for intractable epilepsy. Neurol India 2008;56:127-32.
35Delalande O, Fohlen M, Bulteau C, Jalin C. Surgery for intractable focal epilepsy in children. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2004;160:5S195-202.
36Delande O, Rodriguez D, Chiron C, Fohlen M. Successful surgical relief of seizures associated with hamartoma of the floor of the fourth ventricle in children: Report of two cases. Neurosurgery 2001;49:726-30.
37Bragatti Winckler MI, Dos Santos Riesgo R, Ohlweiler L, Ranzan J, Tellechea Rotta N. Surgical indications in pediatric epilepsy. Medicina (B Aires) 2007;67 (6 Pt 1):614-22.
38Calisto A, Dorfmüller G, Fohlen M, Bulteau C, Conti A, Delalande O. Endoscopic disconnection of hypothalamic hamartomas: Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted, thulium laser-based procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014;14:563-72.
39Chandra PS, Gulati S, Kalra V, Garg A, Mishra NK, Bal CS, et al. Fourth ventricular hamartoma presenting with status epilepticus treated with emergency surgery in an infant. Pediatr Neurosurg 2011;47:217-22.
40Dorfmüller G, Delalande O. Pediatric epilepsy surgery. Handb Clin Neurol 2013;111:785-95.
41Guénot M. Surgical treatment of epilepsy: Outcome of various surgical procedures in adults and children. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2004;160:5S241-50.
42Harvey AS, Cross JH, Shinnar S, Mathern GW, ILAE Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Survey Taskforce. Defining the spectrum of international practice in pediatric epilepsy surgery patients. Epilepsia 2008;49:146-55.
43Kim SK, Wang KC, Hwang YS, Kim KJ, Chae JH, Kim IO, et al. Epilepsy surgery in children: Outcomes and complications. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;1:277-83.
44Procaccini E, Dorfmüller G, Fohlen M, Bulteau C, Delalande O. Surgical management of hypothalamic hamartomas with epilepsy: The stereoendoscopic approach. Neurosurgery 2006;59:ONS336-44.
45Shim KW, Chang JH, Park YG, Kim HD, Choi JU, Kim DS. Treatment modality for intractable epilepsy in hypothalamic hamartomatous lesions. Neurosurgery 2008;62:847-56.
46Adams CB. Hemispherectomy - A modification. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:617-9.
47Beardsworth ED, Adams CB. Modified hemispherectomy for epilepsy: Early results in 10 cases. Br J Neurosurg 1988;2:73-84.
48Bulteau C, Otsuki T, Delalande O. Epilepsy surgery for hemispheric syndromes in infants: Hemimegalencepahly and hemispheric cortical dysplasia. Brain Dev 2013;35:742-7.
49Carson BS, Javedan SP, Freeman JM, Vining EP, Zuckerberg AL, Lauer JA, et al. Hemispherectomy: A hemidecortication approach and review of 52 cases. J Neurosurg 1996;84:903-11.
50Cosgrove GR, Villemure JG. Cerebral hemicorticectomy for epilepsy. J Neurosurg 1993;79:473-4.
51Daniel RT, Villemure JG. Hemispherotomy techniques. J Neurosurg 2003;98:438-9.
52De Ribaupierre S, Delalande O. Hemispherotomy and other disconnective techniques. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E14.
53Delalande O, Dorfmüller G. Parasagittal vertical hemispherotomy: Surgical procedure. Neurochirurgie 2008;54:353-7.
54Cats EA, Kho KH, Van Nieuwenhuizen O, Van Veelen CW, Gosselaar PH, Van Rijen PC. Seizure freedom after functional hemispherectomy and a possible role for the insular cortex: The Dutch experience. J Neurosurg 2007;107:275-80.
55Delalande O, Bulteau C, Dellatolas G, Fohlen M, Jalin C, Buret V, et al. Vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy: Surgical procedures and clinical long-term outcomes in a population of 83 children. Neurosurgery 2007;60:ONS19-32.
56Kestle J, Connolly M, Cochrane D. Pediatric peri-insular hemispherotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 2000;32:44-7.
57Schramm J, Kuczaty S, Sassen R, Elger CE, von Lehe M. Pediatric functional hemispherectomy: Outcome in 92 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:2017-28.
58Villemure JG, Daniel RT. Peri-insular hemispherotomy in paediatric epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22:967-81.
59Villemure JG, Meagher-Villemure K, Montes JL, Farmer JP, Broggi G. Disconnective hemispherectomy for hemispheric dysplasia. Epileptic Disord 2003;5 Suppl 2:S125-30.
60Villemure JG, Vernet O, Delalande O. Hemispheric disconnection: Callosotomy and hemispherotomy. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2000;26:25-78.
61Shimizu H, Maehara T. Modification of peri-insular hemispherotomy and surgical results. Neurosurgery 2000;47:367-72.
62Dorfer C, Czech T, Dressler A, Gröppel G, Mühlebner-Fahrngruber A, Novak K, et al. Vertical perithalamic hemispherotomy: A single-center experience in 40 pediatric patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013;54:1905-12.
63Matheson JM, Truskett P, Davies MA, Vonau M. Hemispherectomy: A further modification using omentum vascularized free flaps. Aust N Z J Surg 1993;63:646-50.
64Rasmussen T. Hemispherectomy for seizures revisited. Can J Neurol Sci 1983;10:71-8.
65Wilson PJ. Cerebral hemispherectomy for infantile hemiplegia. A report of 50 cases. Brain 1970;93:147-80.
66Lüders HO. Epilepsy Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
67Villemure JG. Surgery of epilepsy in children: Who, when, how, and why. Rev Med Suisse Romande 2003;123:577-81.
68Villemure JG, Mascott CR. Peri-insular hemispherotomy: Surgical principles and anatomy. Neurosurgery 1995;37:975-81.
69Caraballo R, Bartuluchi M, Cersósimo R, Soraru A, Pomata H. Hemispherectomy in pediatric patients with epilepsy: A study of 45 cases with special emphasis on epileptic syndromes. Childs Nerv Syst 2011;27:2131-6.
70Holthausen H, Pieper T. Complications of Hemispherectomy. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
71Jadhav T, Cross JH. Surgical approaches to treating epilepsy in children. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2012;14:620-9.
72Steinhoff BJ, Staack AM, Bilic S, Kraus U, Schulze-Bonhage A, Zentner J. Functional hemispherectomy in adults with intractable epilepsy syndromes: A report of 4 cases. Epileptic Disord 2009;11:251-7.
73Wiebe S, Berg AT. Big epilepsy surgery for little people: What′s the full story on hemispherectomy? Neurology 2013;80:232-3.
74Cook SW, Nguyen ST, Hu B, Yudovin S, Shields WD, Vinters HV, et al. Cerebral hemispherectomy in pediatric patients with epilepsy: Comparison of three techniques by pathological substrate in 115 patients. J Neurosurg 2004;100:125-41.
75Althausen A, Gleissner U, Hoppe C, Sassen R, Buddewig S, von Lehe M, et al. Long-term outcome of hemispheric surgery at different ages in 61 epilepsy patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:529-36.
76Anan M, Kamida T, Abe E, Kubo T, Abe T, Hikawa T, et al. A hemispherotomy for intractable startle epilepsy characterized by infantile hemiplegia and drop attacks. J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:1652-5.
77Andrade DM, McAndrews MP, Hamani C, Poublanc J, Angel M, Wennberg R. Seizure recurrence 29 years after hemispherectomy for Sturge Weber syndrome. Can J Neurol Sci 2010;37:141-4.
78Basheer SN, Connolly MB, Lautzenhiser A, Sherman EM, Hendson G, Steinbok P. Hemispheric surgery in children with refractory epilepsy: Seizure outcome, complications, and adaptive function. Epilepsia 2007;48:133-40.
79Beier AD, Rutka JT. Hemispherectomy: Historical review and recent technical advances. Neurosurg Focus 2013;34:E11.
80Ghatan S, McGoldrick P, Palmese C, La Vega-Talbott M, Kang H, Kokoszka MA, et al. Surgical management of medically refractory epilepsy due to early childhood stroke. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014;14:58-67.
81Granata T, Matricardi S, Ragona F, Freri E, Casazza M, Villani F, et al. Hemispherotomy in Rasmussen encephalitis: Long-term outcome in an Italian series of 16 patients. Epilepsy Res 2014;108:1106-19.
82Guan Y, Zhou J, Luan G, Liu X. Surgical treatment of patients with Rasmussen encephalitis. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2014;92:86-93.
83Kawai K, Morino M, Iwasaki M. Modification of vertical hemispherotomy for refractory epilepsy. Brain Dev 2014;36:124-9.
84Lew SM, Koop JI, Mueller WM, Matthews AE, Mallonee JC. Fifty consecutive hemispherectomies: Outcomes, evolution of technique, complications, and lessons learned. Neurosurgery 2014;74:182-94.
85Daniel RT, Villemure JG. Peri-insular hemispherotomy: Potential pitfalls and avoidance of complications. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2003;80:22-7.
86Schramm J, Clusmann H. The surgery of epilepsy. Neurosurgery 2008;62 Suppl 2:463-81.
87Jalilian L, Limbrick DD, Steger-May K, Johnston J, Powers AK, Smyth MD. Complete versus anterior two-thirds corpus callosotomy in children: Analysis of outcome. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010;6:257-66.
88Kasasbeh AS, Smyth MD, Steger-May K, Jalilian L, Bertrand M, Limbrick DD. Outcomes after anterior or complete corpus callosotomy in children. Neurosurgery 2014;74:17-28.
89Maehara T, Shimizu H. Surgical outcome of corpus callosotomy in patients with drop attacks. Epilepsia 2001;42:67-71.
90Shim KW, Lee YM, Kim HD, Lee JS, Choi JU, Kim DS. Changing the paradigm of 1-stage total callosotomy for the treatment of pediatric generalized epilepsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;2:29-36.
91Sunaga S, Shimizu H, Sugano H. Long-term follow-up of seizure outcomes after corpus callosotomy. Seizure 2009;18:124-8.
92Tanriverdi T, Olivier A, Poulin N, Andermann F, Dubeau F. Long-term seizure outcome after corpus callosotomy: A retrospective analysis of 95 patients. J Neurosurg 2009;110:332-42.
93Wong TT, Kwan SY, Chang KP, Hsiu-Mei W, Yang TF, Chen YS, et al. Corpus callosotomy in children. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22:999-1011.
94Adam C. How do the temporal lobes communicate in medial temporal lobe seizures?. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2006;162:813-8.
95Gloor P, Salanova V, Olivier A, Quesney LF. The human dorsal hippocampal commissure. An anatomically identifiable and functional pathway. Brain 1993;116(Pt 5):1249-73.
96Wada JA. Transhemispheric horizontal channels for transmission of epileptic information. Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol 1991;45:235-42.
97Harbaugh RE, Wilson DH, Reeves AG, Gazzaniga MS. Forebrain commissurotomy for epilepsy. Review of 20 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1983;68:263-75.
98Spencer SS, Spencer DD, Sass K, Westerveld M, Katz A, Mattson R. Anterior, total, and two-stage corpus callosum section: Differential and incremental seizure responses. Epilepsia 1993;34:561-7.
99Incorpora G, Pavone P, Castellano-Chiodo D, Praticò AD, Ruggieri M, Pavone L. Gelastic seizures due to hypothalamic hamartoma: Rapid resolution after endoscopic tumor disconnection. Neurocase 2013;19:458-61.
100Shields WD. Surgical treatment of refractory epilepsy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2004;6:349-56.
101Choi JU, Yang KH, Kim TG, Chang JH, Chang JW, Lee BI, et al. Endoscopic disconnection for hypothalamic hamartoma with intractable seizure. Report of four cases. J Neurosurg 2004;100:506-11.