Neurol India Home 
 

LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 523--524

Not a refugee, nasogastric tube in the brain: Modes of prevention and controversies in management

Saswat K Dandpat1, Manjul Tripathi1, Nagesh Varshney2, Aman Batish1, Sandeep Mohindra1,  
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Asha Brain and Spine Centre, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Manjul Tripathi
Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
India




How to cite this article:
Dandpat SK, Tripathi M, Varshney N, Batish A, Mohindra S. Not a refugee, nasogastric tube in the brain: Modes of prevention and controversies in management.Neurol India 2018;66:523-524


How to cite this URL:
Dandpat SK, Tripathi M, Varshney N, Batish A, Mohindra S. Not a refugee, nasogastric tube in the brain: Modes of prevention and controversies in management. Neurol India [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 27 ];66:523-524
Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2018/66/2/523/227265


Full Text



Sir,

Nasogastric tube (NGT) intubation is one of the most commonly performed bedside procedures for enteral feeding and for emptying gastric contents. Though considered an innocuous procedure, vigorous forceful attempts at NGT insertion may lead to various life-threatening complications, viz. esophageal perforation, bronchopleural fistula, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pulmonary hemorrhage.[1] Among these complications, iatrogenic insertion into the brain is the one most lethal. Martinelle et al., first reported this complication in 1974 in a patient of head injury.[1]

A 45-year old male patient was referred in an unconscious status (the Glasgow Coma Scale Score [GCS]: Eye opening 2; Verbal response: 2; Motor response: 5) following an explosive blast injury. The patient was primarily managed at a health care centre, where endotracheal intubation and NGT insertion were performed. After his initial stabilization, a noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scan head was performed to evaluate for associated injuries.

The CT scan of the head revealed a right frontal bone depressed fracture and anterior skull base fracture with bilateral occipital lobe contusions [Figure 1]a. Sagittal and coronal CT images showed that the NGT had crossed the fractured cribriform plate and had reached the vertex, traversing through the brain parenchyma, masquerading as an acute subdural hematoma or a foreign body [Figure 1]b and [Figure 1]c. After hemodynamic stabilization, the NGT was gently pulled out from the nose without any complication. There was no cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea or herniating brain matter from the nose. The patient was kept on prophylactic intravenous antibiotic for 1 week. At a 1-month follow-up, the patient had regained consciousness without having any added neurological deficits.{Figure 1}

NGT misplacements usually occur in patients with a traumatic head injury following an anterior skull base fracture or after complex craniofacial injuries. Such accidents are secondary to lack of adequate radiological investigations at peripheral primary health centers, and also due to the lack of knowledge on the part of the caregivers. The 'red flag' signs of anterior skull base fractures are cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, herniating brain matter, pneumocephalus, or the presence of internal compound fractures. Aspirating gastric contents or auscultating the “pseudo-confirmation gurgle,” (which may often yield a false positive result) can clinically evaluate the proper placement of an NGT. Other confirmatory measures might be an oral intubation, a nasogastric intubation under fluoroscopic or under direct vision.[4] There can be four possible corridors by which the NGT can enter intracranially – a skull base fracture extending across the cribriform plate, a comminuted fracture involving the floor of the anterior cranial fossa, the cribriform plate being thinned out by previous infections, and/or raised intracranial pressure that may cause bony erosion of the anterior cranial fossa.[1],[2] The presence of a deviated nasal septum or pneumatized air sinuses, and overzealous attempts in an uncooperative patient may favor the false passage of the NGT to remote locations in the brain. Such events can be avoided by establishing a proper clinicoradiological diagnosis of the existence of an anterior skull base fracture. The radiological markers of an anterior skull base fracture have been classified as: type 1, cribriform plate fractures, which occur linearly through the cribriform plate; type 2, fronto-ethmoid fractures, which are fractures of the ethmoid and medial frontal sinus walls; type 3, lateral frontal fractures which are fractures that occur through the lateral frontal sinus to the superomedial wall of the orbit; and, type 4, mixed fractures, which are a combination of any of the fractures from the above categories.[5] Radiological confirmation of the correct placement of the NGT is mandatory before starting enteral feeding. In our case, the underlying etiology responsible for the improper positioning of the NGT was the fracture of cribriform plate.

Optimal management following the intracranial placement of the NGT is controversial. Case reports have mentioned a manual retrieval performed through the nose; or, a segmental removal has been carried out after a craniotomy [Figure 2].[1] A craniotomy with anterior skull base repair may occasionally be required in view of the skull base defect. Apart from introducing infection, intracranial insertion of the NGT might be associated with severe debilitating complications such as the occurrence of an intracranial hematoma, motor or sensory deficits, meningitis, or even death in up to 64% of the cases.[3] Whether a prophylactic antibiotic should be administered remains controversial as there is no literature support for the same; however, as the inserted object is traversing through the nasal cavity in a setting of acute injury, there are chances for the development of an ascending infection alongside the tube. It is practically impossible to get an answer for this query in the near future due to the rarity of this complication. Our case highlights the need to be vigilant during NGT intubation in patients who have suffered from a skull base fracture as a result of traumatic brain injury.{Figure 2}

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Roka Y, Shrestha M, Puri P, Aryal S. Fatal inadvertent intracranial insertion of a nasogastric tube. Neurol India 2010;58:802.
2Chandra R, Kumar P. Intracranial introduction of a nasogastric tube in a patient with severe craniofacial trauma. Neurol India 2010;58:804-5.
3Genú PR, de Oliveira DM, Vasconcellos RJ de H, Nogueira RVB, Vasconcelos BC do E. Inadvertent intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube in a patient with severe craniofacial trauma: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1435-8.
4Pandey AK, Sharma AK, Diyora BD, Sayal PP, Ingale HA, Radhakrishnan M. Inadvertent insertion of nasogastric tube into the brain. J Assoc Physicians India 2004;52:322-3.
5Sakas DE, Beale DJ, Ameen AA, Whitwell HL, Whittaker KW, Krebs AJ, et al. Compound anterior cranial base fractures: classification using computerized tomography scanning as a basis for selection of patients for dural repair. J Neurosurg 1998;88:471-7.